Albuquerque, New Mexico, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with voyeurism, in violation of New Mexico Statutes Section 30-9-20 defines voyeurism as intentionally viewing or recording the intimate areas of an unconsenting person without their knowledge in a private space or anywhere with a reasonable expectation of privacy. Definition and Prohibited Acts Under New Mexic

Claremore, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on defamation and libel theories. Janice Steidley, the former district attorney for District 12 (Craig, Mayes, and Rogers Counties, Oklahoma), and David Iski, a former assistant district attorney in District 12, sued John Singer, an investigator for the Claremore Police Department. Steidley was elec

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories. Coach and teacher Marc Lucio refused to shake the hands of several Brownsville Independent School District (BISD) board members and employees during a meeting he was invited to attend to celebrate the successes of a team he coached. He claims his actions were motivate

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault resulting in serious bodily injury in Indian County, in violation of 18 USC 1151, 1152, 113(a)(6), 21 O.S. 843.5. Defendant allegedly violently assaulted and shook his three-month-old infant son, resulting in severe, long-term physical injuries and developmental delays. Because the victim was Native America

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841. Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff Freddie Alaniz investigates crimes on the highways in and around Tulsa, Oklahoma. He has experience in drug interdiction, has served as a task force officer with the federal Drug Enforcement Administr

Montgomery, Alabama civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a declaratory judgment theory challenging the Constitutionality Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act (“Act”) in 2011, ALA. CODE § 15- 20A-11. Under it, no sex offender may, among other things, “reside or conduct an overnight visit with a minor,” even if they are the minor’s pare

Sapulpa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with grand larceny, r Oklahoma's Marsy's LawRight to be heard: Expanded opportunities to speak during crucial criminal justice proceedings, such as sentencing or parole hearings. [1] (https://www.readfrontier.org/stories/will-oklahoma-voters-amend-victims-rights-in-the-states-constitution-a-national-campaign-hopes-so/),

Sulphur, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Count I, Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.1991, § 1114(A)(1), and Count II, Lewd Molestation in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.1998, § 1123. Reported by: Kent Morlan A defendant may waive his r

Guthrie, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree murder in violation of 21 O.S. 1114, rape by instrumentation in violation of 21 O.S. 1114, and forcible oral sodomy in violation of 21 O.S. 888, Reported by: Kent Morlan The trial court allowe

Norman, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon in violation 21 O.S. 791, Two Counts of Kidnapping in violation of 21 O.S. 741, and Four Counts of Forcible Sodomy in violation of 21 O.S. 88. Reported by: Kent Morlan On Ap

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory. Reported by: Kent Morlan The Plaintiff claimed that she was injured and/or damaged in a car wreck that occurred on July 4, 2014 when Defendant pulled out from a shopping center parking lot an

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with Count 1, trafficking in illegal drugs, after former conviction of two (2) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-415; Count 2, possession of marijuana, second offense, after former conviction of one (1) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-402; and Count 3, failure to obtain a dru

Buffalo, New York, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged two counts of Grand Larceny in the Third Degree (Class D felonies), one count of Unlawful Possession of Personal Identification Information in the Second Degree (Class E felony) and one count of Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree (Class E felony). Graham entered a guilty plea to all counts of the indictment. Reporte

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: JUDGE DOUG DRUMMOND: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY AND REPRESENTED BY COURTNEY RAINBOLT PD. STATE REPRESENTED BY DANNY ANSON. COURT REPORTER: WAIVED. DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT. DEFENDANT WAIVES RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL / NON-JURY TRIAL AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA AND SENTENCES DEFENDANT TO:

San Francisco, California United States District Attorney's Office sued ByteDance, dba TikTok on an invasion of privacy theory claiming that the social media company for violating the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and breaching a 2019 FTC consent order. The Government claimed that TikTok failed to properly screen out underage users and gathering data violating the Children'

New Haven, Connecticut, justice went to hell when Vernon Horn and Marquis Jackson were wrongfully convicted of murder and were sentenced to prison. Personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. Vernon Horn and Marquis Jackson were accused, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to “On January 24, 1999, at app

¶1 Petitioner, Granville Lee Humphrey, was charged by Information with Possession of Controlled Dangerous Substance, Case No. CRF-79-2159, and Carrying a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony, Case No. CRF-79-2273. He posted a bond in the sum of $3,000.00 (Three Thousand Dollars) and $5,000.00 (Five Thousand Dollars) respectively. Preliminary hearing in each case was set for July 10, 1979,

¶1 On August 14, 1998, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this Court after being denied bond pending trial in the District Court of Oklahoma County. In an order filed August 14, 1998, the Honorable Noma D. Gurich, District Judge, denied Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. Judge Gurich denied bond finding that Petitioner is a flight risk and that he poses

Topeka, Kansas, personal lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory. Reported by Kent Morlan Pravin G. Sampat sued the Department and Stone, as an individual, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as four federal statute

Stilwell, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that Service Oklahoma does not have the authority to revoke Plaintiff's driving privileges because the requirement to install a mandatory ignition interlock program called an IDAP is so punitive in nature that it violates the Double Jeopardy progection of both the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions. 47 O.S. §

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with receiving and possession stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713 (A), which provides: A. Every person who buys or receives, in any manner, upon any consideration, personal property of a value of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or more that has been stolen, embezzled, obtained by false pretense or robbery, know

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: POSSESSION OF A FIREARM AFCF, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283 POSSESSION OF A FIREARM AFCF, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283(a) A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, it shall be unlawful for any person convicted of any felony in any court of this state or of another state or of the United States to

Charleston, South Carolina, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with interference with commerce by threats or violence. Jerome Sydney Heyward, 63, a former North Charleston City Councilmember, has been sentenced to six years in federal prison for extortion, bribery, and money laundering. Mike A. Brown, 47, former North Charleston City Council Member, has been sentence

Clarksburg, West Virginia civil litigation lawyers represented the parties Michael B. Wilber owns Lot 407, located at 90 Sawgrass Drive within the Locust Hill subdivision, a common-interest community organized pursuant to the West Virginia Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act as codified in Chapter 36B of the West Virginia Code. As a property owner within the subdivision, Mr. Wilber is a membe

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trafficking in illegal drugs, after former conviction of two or more felonies in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415 and 63 O.S. 2-402. Reported by: Kent Morlan In March, 2007, Tulsa police officers Ludwig and Beaty