| United States of America v. Jessie Leroy Glass, Jr. |
|
Statesville, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession for child sexual abuse material. In late 2019, April Glass reported to law enforcement that Glass had “a massive amount of child porn saved on his phone.” J.A. 409. She provided the email address and suspected password for Glass’s Google Photos account, wherein he reportedly kept much of $ (12-03-2025 - NC) |
| United States of America v Jessie Leroy Glass, Jr. |
|
Statesville, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of child sexual abuse material. In late 2019, April reported to law enforcement that Glass had “a massive amount of child porn saved on his phone.” J.A. 409. She provided the email address and suspected password for Glass’s Google Photos account, wherein he reportedly kept much of the $ (12-02-2025 - NC) |
| Tariq Farooq v. Nucor Business Technology, Inc. and Capgemini America, Inc. |
|
Dallas, Texas, pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent himself without a lawyer on an employment discrimination case. |
| Janelle Quinn v. Columbia County School District |
|
August, Georgia, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a education civil rights violation theory. |
| Zoe Hollis v. R& R Restaurants, Inc., et al. |
|
Portland, Oregon employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. |
| Kaukab Khan v. Crossover Market, LLC; Trilogy, Inc. |
|
El Paso, Texas pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer field a civil rights claimed against the Defendants. |
| Kelli Smith v. United States Parcel Service, Inc. |
|
Houston, Texas, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on job discrimination theories. |
| Diana Newton v. Kohl's, Inc. |
|
Rutland, Vermont, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights employment discrimination theory. |
| Tom Koch v. UNUM Group, et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3. |
| Jay F. Vermillion v. Tom Francum, et al. |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theory. |
| LaNetra Kellar v. The Yunion, Inc. |
|
Flint, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination toery. |
| Stephen Berger v. Costco Wholesale Corporation |
|
Juneau, Alaska, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory. |
| Brandon King v. United Parcel Service, et al. |
|
Des Moines, Iowa, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued job discrimination theory. |
| Julie A. Tamm and Rosannea M. Przybylski v. Milan Nerad |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued Count I—First Amendment Retaliation (42 U.S.C. § 1983) (official and personal capacity); Count II—Llewellyn Preemption (state-law claim); Count III— Reasonableness Challenge – Square Lake (state-law claim); Count IV—Selective Enforcement Equal Protection) (§ 1983) (official an $0 (09-25-2025 - MI) |
| Jason Jorjani v. New Jersey Institute of Technology, et al. |
|
Newark, New Jersey, employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights job discrimination theory. |
| Jane Doe 1 v. City View Independent school District |
|
Wichita Falls, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation claim. |
| Leah P. Hollis v. Morgan State University, et al. |
|
Baltimore, Maryland employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on d Title VII, Title IX, Section 1983, and Maryland state law violation theories. |
| Andrew Morgan v. Allison Crane & Rigging, L.L.C. |
|
Williamsport, Pennsylvania disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory. |
| Mary Kay Thomas v. Marshall Public Schools, et al. |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued asserting claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. |
| Mary Lynn Shumate v. City of Lynchburg, et al. |
|
Lynchburg, Virginia employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a sex discrimination theory. |
| Brian Hussey v. City of Cambridge, et al. |
|
Boston, Massachusetts civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a First Amendment violation toery. |
| Martha Ellis v. Salt Lake City Corporation, et al. |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah personal Injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation theories. |
| Steve Melton v. City of Forrest City, Arkansas; Cedric Williams |
|
Little Rock, Arkansas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a First Amendment violation theory. |
| Dorothy Bivens v. Zep, Inc. |
|
Detroit, Michigan employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a retaliation theory. |
| United States of America v. Jaime Lopez |
|
Doña Ana Man Sentenced for Fentanyl Trafficking and Illegal Firearm Possession More... $0 (08-11-2025 - NM)
|
|
Next Page |