Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife |
Facing for the first time a requirement to review for environmental impacts its |
Andrew V. v. Jessica V. |
In this child custody dispute following a final custody determination, we issue a peremptory writ in the first instance because respondent court has improperly deprived petitioner of an opportunity to be meaningfully heard before granting real party’s move-away request to take the two minor children from the State of California to the State of Washington. |
In the Matter of the Adoption of J.M.S., a minor |
¶1 This case, like Nevares v. M.L.S., 2015 UT 34, presents ques-tions concerning the applicability and constitutionality of Utah Code section 78B-6-111. That provision forbids a biological father |
Harry M. Whittington, et al. v. City of Austin, et al. |
The City elected to take property belonging to the Whittingtons. As part of the process, |
Cody Meine, et al. v. Hren Ranches, Inc., et al. |
¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellees (collectively, the Meines) commenced this action in the Fifth |
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. Insomniac, Inc. |
Plaintiffs and appellants Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission (Commission) and Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Association (Association)1 appeal from a judgment and order of dismissal entered following the sustaining without leave to amend of demurrers by defendants and respondents Insomniac, Inc. (Insomniac); Pasquale Rotella (Rotella); Go Ventures, Inc. (Ventures); and Reza Gerami (Gerami).2 ... More... $0 (01-27-2015 - CA) |
James Scott Richardson v. Greg Franc |
In order to access their home in Novato, California, James Scott Richardson and Lisa Donetti (respondents) had to traverse land belonging to their neighbors, Greg and Terrie Franc (appellants) on a 150-foot long road which was authorized by an easement for “access and public utility purposes.” Over a 20-year period, both respondents and their predecessors-in-interest maintained landscaping, ir... More... $0 (01-27-2015 - CA) |
The People v. Rickey Lane Alexander, II |
Defendant and appellant Rickey Lane Alexander, II, appeals from his conviction |
Walter c. Minnick v. Hawley Troxell Ennis and Hawley, L.L.P. |
Walter Minnick and A.K. Lienhart Minnick, husband and wife (collectively Minnicks), brought a professional malpractice action against the law firm Hawley Troxell Ennis and Hawley, LLP (Hawley Troxell), alleging negligence in rendering services in connection with a real estate development project. On motion of Hawley Troxell for summary judgment, the district court dismissed the action as time-barr... More... $0 (01-09-2015 - ID) |
Mesa Shopping Center-East, LLC v. Robert O. Hill |
“[T]he party prevailing on the contract” in a breach of contract action is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees if the contract “specifically provides” for such recovery. (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (a); see Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(10)(A).) But “there shall be no prevailing party” if “an action has been voluntarily dismissed” (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (b)(2)),... More... $0 (12-23-2014 - CA) |
Manuel Tabarrejo v. Princess Retirement Homes, Inc. |
Petitioner Manuel Tabarrejo was employed as a caregiver by real party in interest Princess Retirement Homes, Inc. (PRH). After Tabarrejo left his employment, he filed a claim with the Labor Commissioner for unpaid wages and other wage-related claims. The Labor Commissioner awarded Tabarrejo $131,096.77. |
United States of America v. Todd Newman, Anthony Chiasson |
Defendants‐appellants Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson |
Aaron Jordan, Michael Jordan, Heather Jordan, Gilbert Jordan, Phyllis Ann Woods and Donna Joyce Curtis v. Cynthia Kay Lyles |
Aaron Jordan, Michael Jordan, Heather Jordan, Gilbert Jordan, Phyllis Ann Woods, and Donna Joyce Curtis appeal the trial court‟s judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered in favor of Cynthia Kay Lyles. In two issues, Appellants argue that the trial court erroneously rendered judgment notwithstanding the jury‟s verdict and, alternatively, the evidence supports the jury‟s verdict for interf... More... $0 (12-10-2014 - TX) |
In re Marriage of CHARLES D. and CONNIE A. McHUGH |
Appellant Charles D. McHugh filed an order to show cause asking the trial court to reduce his child support obligations because he lost his job as a commissioned salesman and his new job paid considerably less.1 In opposing Charles’s request, respondent Connie A. McHugh countered by asking the trial court to increase support because Charles lost his job for diverting business from his employer t... More... $0 (11-26-2014 - CA) |
Linus F. Dias v. Ritika Dias |
Appellant Linus Dias appeals the trial court’s order granting appellee Ritika Dias’s |
Christian Westby v. Gregory Schaefer, M.D. and Mercy Medical Center, NAMPA |
Christian Westby, James Westby, and Kristina Westby (collectively “the Westbys”) permissively appealed the Canyon County district court’s denial of the Westbys’ motion to reconsider the court’s protective order granted to Mercy Medical Center and Dr. Gregory Schaefer. |
Shawnna Rae Cope v. Utah Valley State College |
¶1 Shawnna Cope was injured while practicing with the Utah |
Emily E. Suter v. Jeffrey C. Biggers |
This appeal arises from a custody dispute between Jeffrey Biggers (“Jeff”) and Emily Suter (“Emily”) over their two children. The trial court entered a temporary order that the boys enroll in school in Emmett, Idaho, until the conclusion of trial. After trial, the court found that it would be in the boys’ best interests to remain in the Emmett area. Consistent with this finding, the cour... More... $0 (11-13-2014 - ID) |
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Matthew Howard |
In this case concerning a seaman’s entitlement to payments for maintenance and cure, his employer argues that the trial court erred in granting the seaman’s motion to compel such payments. We agree that the order is a temporary injunction and that it does not comply with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 683. We therefore declare the order void, dissolve it, and remand the case to the trial |
William E. Bolden v. John and Jane Doe |
¶1 William Bolden is the putative father of a child (J.S.) born in 2011. The case before us on appeal is an adoption proceeding involving John and Jane Doe, the would-be adoptive parents of J.S. Bolden tried to intervene in and object to the Does‘ adoption of J.S. He was barred from doing so because he failed to preserve his legal rights as a father by filing a paternity affidavit within the ti... More... $0 (11-04-2014 - UT) |
The City of Houston v. Downstream Environmental, L.L.C. |
The City of Houston appeals from an interlocutory order denying its request to vacate a previously entered agreed order, which the City contends is a temporary injunction. We agree that it is a temporary injunction. Because it does not comply |
Lisa W. Allred v. Ronald J. Saunders, M.D. |
¶1 This case comes before us on petition for interlocutory |
Lisa W. Allred v. Ronald J. Saunders, M.D. |
¶1 This case comes before us on petition for interlocutory |
El Reno Housing Associates v. E. Allen Cowen, II |
¶1 Judgment Debtor E. Allen Cowen II appeals the trial court's September 13, 2013, order denying his motion for the release of a judgment lien held on his property by Judgment Creditor El Reno Housing Associates Limited Partnership. Judgment Debtor alleged Judgment Creditor had failed to timely file a renewal of judgment lien within five years of obtaining the judgment. The trial court found the ... More... $0 (10-15-2014 - OK) |
In the Matter of A. H., aka A. R., a Child. |
that 10 permanency judgment, and we affirmed without opinion. Dept. of Human Services v. B. 11 R., 247 Or App 766, 274 P3d 315, rev den, 351 Or 678 (mother's petition), and rev den, 12 351 Or 761 (father's petition) (2012). DHS filed petitions to terminate mother's and 13 father's parental rights in August 2011. Approximately one year later, in August 2012, 14 the court held the annual permanency ... More... $0 (10-15-2014 - OR) |
Next Page |