| United States of America v. Marol M. Aguiar Rodriguez |
|
Peoria, Illinois, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with robbery of property or money. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Anthony Ray McMillon |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery by strangulation-domestic in violation of 21 O.S. 644(j), which provides: |
| Flying T Ranch, Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, et al. |
|
Under federal common law, Indian tribes may be sued only under two circumstances: when a tribe waives its sovereign immunity or when Congress unequivocally abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Here, Flying T Ranch (Flying T) filed suit in Snohomish County Superior Court to quiet title to nonreservation land purchased by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (Tribe). Flying T contends it had acquired $0 (10-10-2025 - WA) |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Milwaukee, WI criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering |
| United States of America v. James Bernard Powell |
|
Columbia, South Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with knowingly possessed a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, which is prosecutable in a court of the United States; In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(c)(1)(A)(i) with forfeiture allegations pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(d), Title 21, United States Co $0 (10-03-2025 - SC) |
| State of Oklahoma v. D.M.T. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with using technology to engate in sexual communctions with a minor in violation of 21 O.S. 1040.13.a. |
| United States of America v. Deverne Torres, Jr. |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Aggravated Sexual Abuse and Sexual Abuse of a Minor. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Tyler Clark McDrummond |
|
Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery by strangulation in violation of 21 O.S. 644 (j), which provides: |
| State of Oklahoma v. T.J.B. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with lewd molestation and first-degree rape. |
| United States of America v. Gonzalo Diaz-Resendiz, Edin Oneil Carrillos-Rodriguez, Raul Samano-Fuerte |
|
Toledo, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegal reentry |
| United States of America v. Jentonia Williams |
|
New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Federal Bank Robbery |
| United States of America v. Kamal Khalid, Fnu Shahrukh |
|
Baltimore, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy and conspiracy and securities fraud and odometer rollback scheme. |
| Sherry H. Detwiler v. Mid-Columbia Medical Center, et al. |
|
Portland, Oregon, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory. |
| Thomas Michael Smith and Monaleto Sneed v. P.A.M. Transports, Inc. |
|
Nashville, Tennessee, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 42 U.S.C. § 2000e adn Tennessee Human Rights Act (THRA) violation theories. |
| Patrick Alston v. AY Logistics, Inc., et al. |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina pro se Plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to presented himself without the help of a lawyer on prosecuring claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 |
| Thomas L. Ford v. Daniel P. Discroll, Secretary of the Army |
|
Richmond, Virginia, pro se Plaintiff, unsuccessfully attempted to present himself without the help of a lawyer on multiple employment-related claims, including claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S. $0 (09-22-2025 - VA) |
| United States of America v. Jean Eliobert Jasme, a/k/a “ED1,” “Eddy One,” and “Tio Loco” |
|
Milwaukee, WI criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with International Cocaine-Trafficking |
| United States of America v. Otravious Romel Harris, Sr. |
|
New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm |
| United States of America v. Earl Hardy Morrow |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of heroin with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Ronald Fetters |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Zaakia Jackline Rajabian, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al. |
|
Phoenix, Arizona, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff in a depute over who owned a Mercedes-Benz. |
| Raymond Thompson v. Joshua Cockrell and Robert Gerholdt |
|
St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
| United States of America v. Dantrell McZeal |
|
New Orleans Man Sentenced to 105 Months for 2022 Gas Station Shooting More... $0 (09-12-2025 - LA)
|
| United States of America v. Dantrell McZeal |
|
New Orleans Man Sentenced to 105 Months for 2022 Gas Station Shooting More... $0 (09-12-2025 - LA)
|
|
Next Page |