Alexandria, Virginia civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.

Barnett, a former registered nurse and employee of INOVA, refused to receive
the COVID-19 vaccine as required under INOVA’s policy because of its alleged conflict
with her religious belief. INOVA discharged her, and Barnett filed a Title VII religious
discrimination ... More...   $0 (01-10-2025 - VA)

Colorado Springs, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder.


At trial, the People presented evidence from which the jury
could find the following facts. Gabe Garcia and the victim had been
“inseparable” ever since they met and became best friends in
school. “If I needed something,” he testified, “she would help me.” More...   $0 (01-09-2025 - CO)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Kent Morlan represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 644(C), which provides:

C. Any person who commits any assault and battery against a current or former intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall be guilty of domestic abus... More...   $0 (01-08-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with public intoxication in violation of 37 O.S. 8-101(D) and resisting arrest in violation of 21 O.S. 268.

37A O.S. 6-101(D) provides:

A. No person shall:

1. Knowingly sell, deliver or furnish alcoholic beverages to any person under twenty-one (21) years of age;

2. Sell, deliver or kn... More...   $0 (01-06-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2), which provides:

A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turn... More...   $0 (01-08-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Nathan Miller represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property less than $1,000 in violation of f 21 O.S. 1760(A)(1), which provides:

A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is gu... More...   $0 (01-08-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unauthorized use of a credit/dbit care in violation of 21 O.S. 1660.29, which provides:

A person who, with intent to defraud (a) the issuer, (b) a person or organization providing money, goods, services or anything else of value, or (c) any other person, uses for the purpose of obtaining money, goods, services... More...   $0 (01-06-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: LMFR, LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731
Date of Offense: 08/23/2023
PANNEBAKER, JONATHON WAYNE
Disposed: DEFERRED, 01/07/2025. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER(LMFR)
Violation of 21 O.S. 1... More...   $0 (01-07-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a stolen vehicle in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103, which provides:




A. A person not entitled to the possession of a vehicle who receives, possesses, conceals, sells, or disposes of it, knowing the vehicle to be stolen or converted under circumstances constituting a crime shall, upon co... More...   $0 (01-06-2025 - OK)

Hastings, Minnesota civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a real property dispute.

The Sawyers and the Boland Trustees dispute ownership of an 8.5' by 117' strip of land on the east side of the Boland Trustees' property and the west side of the Sawyers' property (the Adverse Possession Parcel).

In 1966, the Boland family acquired property on Lake Marion (the Bolan... More...   $0 (01-06-2025 - MN)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, 2nd office, in violation of 47 O.S. 902, which provides:


A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, stree... More...   $0 (01-06-2025 - OK)

Flemingsburg, Kentucky real property lawyers represented the parties in am adverse possession dispute.

The Wilkersons purchased property at 600 Helphenstine Road in Wallingford, Kentucky. The Wilkersons hired others to maintain the property (mowing and cutting hay) until they took up residence there in 2016.

The Babers live on an adjacent tract of one and one-half acres ... More...   $0 (01-03-2025 - KY)

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged withfour counts of extortionate threats involving information obtained from protected computers
Brazilian Man Charged With Making Extortionate Threats To Publicize Stolen Data Obtained By Unlawful Computer Intrusio... More...   $0 (12-23-2024 - NJ)

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Kidnapping Resulting in Death and Transporting a Minor in Interstate Commerce with Intent to Engage in Criminal Sexual Activity
Amite Man Charged with Kidnapping Resulting in Death and Transporting a Mi... More...   $0 (01-03-2025 - LA)

Cincinnati, Ohio civil litigation lawyers represented the parties challenging net neutrality policies adopted by the FCC.

As Congress has said, the Internet has “flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a
minimum of government regulation.” 47 U.S.C. § 230(a)(4). The Federal Communications
Commission largely followed this command from the Telecommunications Act of 199... More...   $0 (01-02-2025 - OH)

Tulsa, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

1. The phrase 'actual resident' and the word 'resident' as used in Title 12 O.S.1951, § 1272, as amended, contemplate an actual residence with substantially the same attributes as are intended when the word 'domicile' is used.

2. In determining a person's intentions as to his domicile, his acts and conduct ... More...   $0 (04-25-1961 - OK)

Portland, Oregon real property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on wrongful taking and excessive fines theories.

Plaintiffs have ALLEGED viable takings and excessive fines claims under federal law and viable takings claims under Oregon law, and these claims are not barred by collateral estoppel or res judicata. As to the timeliness of these claims, this Court holds... More...   $0 (12-27-2024 - OR)