United States of America v. AmeriCare Ambulance Service, Inc. Middle District of Florida Federal Courthouse - Tampa, Florida |
Tampa, FL - Tampa’s Largest Ambulance Providers Agree To Pay $5.5 Million To Resolve False Claims Act Allegations Regarding Medically Unnecessary Ambulance Transports |
Philip Marsteller and Robert Swisher v. Lynn Tilton, Patriarch Partners, LLC, MD Helicopters, Inc., Norbert Vergez Northern District of Alabama Federal Courthouse - Birmingham, Alabama |
Relators Philip Marsteller and Robert Swisher brought this action against |
United States of America, ex rel. David Choate and Don Pyburn v. Primex Clinical Laboratories, LLC Northern District of Texas Federal Courthouse - Dallas, Texas |
Dallas, TX - Laboratory and Owner of Lab Management Services Company to Pay $3.77 Million to Resolve Kickback and Medical Necessity Claims |
United States of America, ex rel. Steve Greenfield v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al. District of New Jersey Federal Courthouses |
Accredo Health Group, Inc., a specialty pharmacy that provides home care for patients with hemophilia (a rare condition that prevents blood from clotting properly), made donations to charities, two of which allegedly recommended Accredo as an approved provider for hemophilia patients. This raises whether the donations came with something expected in return for the recommendations, which might trig... More... $0 (01-23-2018 - NJ) |
William Baxter v. California State Teachers' Retirement System |
Eleven retired teachers (Teachers) who had been employed in the Salinas Unified |
Commodores Entertainment Corporation v. Thomas McClary and Fifth Avenue Entertainment, LLC Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals - Elbert P. Tuttle Federal Courthouse - Atlanta, Georgia |
In this common-law trademark case, Thomas McClary appeals from an order granting judgment as a matter of law to Commodores Entertainment Corporation (CEC) and converting a preliminary injunction into a permanent one against McClary and his corporation, Fifth Avenue Entertainment, LLC. The dispute concerned ownership of the mark “The Commodores,” the name of a famous Grammy Award–winning rhythm and... More... $0 (01-09-2018 - FL) |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. LAURENCE SCHNEIDER, ET AL. AND LAURENCE SCHNEIDER v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. U.S. Court of Appeals - D.C. Circuit |
Appellant Laurence Schneider – also called a Relator – brought a qui tam suit under the False Claims Act against JPMorgan Chase, alleging that Chase falsely claimed compliance with a Settlement it, and a number of other large banks, reached with the United States and state governments. The Settlement – and it is a massive one, costing Chase alone $1.1 billion of cash and over $4.2 billion of in-k... More... $0 (01-09-2018 - DC) |
City of Modesto v. The Dow Chemical Company |
In late 1998, the City of Modesto (the City), the City of Modesto Sewer District |
Wandering Dago Inc. v. New York State Office of General Services et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals - New York, New York |
New York, NY Plaintiff‐appellant Wandering Dago, Inc., (“WD”) operates a food truck and |
Justin Kim v. Reins International California, Inc. |
Appellant Justin Kim sued his former employer, Reins |
STATE OF MONTANA v. MURRY KIM REYNOLDS |
On November 19, 2014, Reynolds was charged by Information in Ravalli County |
United States of America v. EmCare, Inc. a subdivision of Envision Healthcare Corporation Western District of North Carolina Courthouse - Charlotte, North Carolina |
Charlotte, NC - EmCare, Inc. to Pay $29.8 Million To Resolve False Claims Act Allegations |
United States of America, et rel. Garbe v. Kmart Corporation Southern District of Illinois Federal Courthouse - Benton, Illinois |
Kmart Corporation to Pay U.S. $32.3 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations for Overbilling Federal Health Programs for Generic Prescription Drugs |
United States of America, ex rel. Paul J. Solomon v. Lockheed Martin Corporation; Northrop Gruman Systems Corporation Northern District of Texas Federal Courthouse - Dallas, Texas |
Paul Solomon brought a False Claims Act action against his employer Northrop Grumman and against Lockheed Martin for making false claims against the government. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court held that it lacked jurisdiction over Solomon’s claims based on the Act’s public disclosure bar. We AFFIRM. |
United States ex rel. Mason v. HMA, et al, Federal Courthouse - District of Columbia |
Dallas, TX - Two Physician Groups Pay Over $33 Million to Resolve Claims Involving HMA Hospitals |
United States of America, ex rel. Kenneth J. Conner v. Amrish K. Mahajan Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse - Chicago, Illinois |
After losing his job at Mutual Bank, Kenneth |
United States of America ex rel. Suzanne Scott, et al. v. Pine Creek Medical Center, LLC Northern District of Texas Federal Courthouse - Dallas, Texas |
Dallas, TX - Dallas-Based Physician-Owned Hospital to Pay $7.5 Million to Settle Allegations of Paying Kickbacks to Physicians in Exchange for Surgical Referrals |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOHSIN RAZA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARUKH IQBAL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOHAMMAD ALI HAIDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUMAIRA IQBAL United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
On April 23, 2015, a federal grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, returned a seven |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL ANTHONY R. SPAY v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION; CAREMARK RX UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT |
Part D of the Medicare program is a voluntary prescription drug benefit program that subsidizes the cost of prescription drugs and prescription drug insurance premiums for Medicare enrollees.2 The Part D program operates as a public-private partnership between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and government contractors. CMS contracts with private insurance companies called “S... More... $0 (12-03-2017 - PA) |
United States of America and the State of Minnesota ex rel. Jeff Samuelson, M.D. v. Skin Care Doctors, P.A., and Michael J. Ebertz, M.D. District of Minnesota Federal Courthouse - Minneapolis, Minnesota |
Minneapolis, MN - Local Dermatologist Pays $850,000 To Settle False Claims Act Allegations - Skin Care Doctors, P.A. and its CEO allegedly engaged in improper Medicare billing |
Malissa Julian v. Glenair, Inc. |
Appellant Glenair, Inc., challenges the denial of its motion to |
United States of America, ex rel. Anthony R. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corporation Third Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
We are asked to consider the viability of two potential defenses to an alleged False Claims Act violation that arise in the context of the Medicare Part D Program: the government knowledge inference, which can defeat a finding of scienter in certain circumstances, and the element of materiality.1 The District Court relied upon the government knowledge inference doctrine in dismissing the claims. A... More... $0 (11-23-2017 - ) |
United States ex rel. Academy Health Center, Inc. v. Hyperion Foundation, Inc., et al. Southern District of Mississippi - Federal Courthouse - Jackson, Mississippi |
Jackson, MS - Mississippi Skilled Nursing Facility, Related Companies, and Executives Agree to Pay $1.25 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations of Grossly Substandard Care to Facility Residents |
United States of America, et al. v. Paramedics Plus, L.L.C., et al. Eastern District of Texas Federal Courthouse - Sherman, Texas |
Sherman, TX - Stephen Dean, an individual, The State of Oklahoma and the United States of America sued Tulsa, Oklahoma Emergency Medical Services Authority, its executive director Steve Williamson, Paramedics Plus, LLC, and East Texas Medical Center Regional Healthcare Syste, Inc. on Qui Tam (False Claims Act) theory under 31 U.S.C. 2729 claiming that Williamson and EMSA Chief Financial Officer K... More... $0 (11-08-2017 - OK) |
Leonard Cottrell, et al. v. Alcon Laboratories, et al. Third Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
In this putative class action, consumers of prescription eye medication allege that manufacturers and distributors of the medication packaged it in such a way that forced them to waste it, violating the consumer protection statutes of their home states. The District Court dismissed the entire action for lack of jurisdiction, finding the consumers’ allegations of injury in fact insufficient to conf... More... $0 (11-03-2017 - NJ) |
Next Page |