Jackson, MS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with raising three claims of error: ineffective assistance of counsel, improper limitation on cross-examination, and insufficient evidence to support the verdict.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Clint A. Claypole represented the Defendant charged with First Degree Manslaughter

Criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing, raising three claims of error: ineffective assistance of counsel, improper limitation on cross-examination, and insufficient evidence to support the verdict

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Smuggling Explosives on Plane Bound for Orlando-Sanford Airport
Carbon County Man Sentenced for Trying to Smuggle Explosives on Plane Bound for Orlando-Sanford Airport

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence and aggravated battery while driving under the influence. Zaitz now timely appeals his convictions, arguing the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of battery was
clearly erroneous

More...   $0 (05-03-2024 - KS)

Anchorage, Alaska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug, firearm crimes
Anchorage man sentenced to 11 years for drug, firearm crimes

Spokane, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Armed Fentanyl Trafficking
Armed Fentanyl Trafficker Sentenced to Federal Prison

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Kidnapping and Killing Gallup Man

Naschitti Man Sentenced for Kidnapping and Killing Gallup Man

Oklahoma City. Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a Defendant's Brief in Support of Plea in Abatement, Motion to Quash, Motion to Set Aside the Information and Motion to Dismiss

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Arizona operates under a "comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the resulting damages. In other words, liability for the crash falls on whoever caused it. But in some cases, it's not only one pe

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Violent Albuquerque Crime Spree

Malachi Crockett Sentenced for Role in Violent Albuquerque Crime Spree

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced bas

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes. The federal district court is the starting point for any case arising under federal statutes, the Constitution, or treaties.

Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a Plea in Abatement, Motion to Quash, Motion to Set Aside the Information and Motion to Dismiss .

Wichita, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute fentanyl.

Wichita man sentenced for trafficking fentanyl

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming $215,000 in damages and/or injuries.

A plaintiff injured by a defendant's wrongful act may file a tort lawsuit to recover money from
that defendant. To name a particularly familiar example of a tort, a person who negligently
causes a vehicular co

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court, Creek County, Oklahoma, CJ-23-0001, and was removed to federal court by Ever Fresh Farms Transportation, Inc., et al.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

Oklahoma's comparative negligence statute includes a so-called "50-percent rule.” In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case as filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2023-008744, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Arizona operates under a "comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the

Columbus, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with defrauding local business.

Defendant used stolen funds to buy yacht, amphibious plane, luxury vehicle

Washington DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Assaulting Law Enforcement.

Defendant Hurled Object at Police and Charged Police Line with Stolen Riot Shield

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case is about a truck crash. Albalawneh styled his Complaint, (ECF No. 1-2), as several paragraphs of general allegations followed by two "causes of action" and a demand for "exemplary damages."

Alanta, Georgia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Brandishing a Weapon.

Cincinnati Man Sentenced for Brandishing a Weapon on Frontier Airlines Flight