Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al.

Date: 03-18-2024

Case Number: 2:23-cv-01490

Judge: John J. Tuchi

Court: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Maricopa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael P. Grubbs and Nathaniel B. Preston - 602-649-6486

Defendant's Attorney: Phoenix, Arizona insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description:
Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.



This case as filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2023-008744, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.



Arizona operates under a "comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the resulting damages. In other words, liability for the crash falls on whoever caused it. But in some cases, it's not only one person's fault, but both to varying degrees.



Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al.?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Which court heard Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Maricopa County), AZ. The presiding judge was John J. Tuchi.

Who were the attorneys in Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Michael P. Grubbs and Nathaniel B. Preston - 602-649-6486. Defendant's attorney: Phoenix, Arizona insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..

When was Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al. decided?

This case was decided on March 18, 2024.