| Patent Infringement Law |
| |
|
Nathan Hansen v. Windsong Ranch Community Association, Inc. et al.
|
|
Sherman, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.
The case was filed in the 393rd Judicial District, Denton County, Texas and was removed to federal court by the
Defendants.
Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court and sought remand.
"Federal courts have jurisdiction over civil cases in a variety of situation... More... $0 (06-05-2023 - TX)
|
|
James Halverson v. Debra Anne Haaland, Secretary of the Internior
|
|
Billings, Montana real property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking to quiet title to n 86.42% interest, or 690.54 acres, in Allotment 1809 from the United States as trust holder to the Estate of Jack Halverson ("Jack's estate"), and (2) a fee patent deed conveying Jack's estate's interest in Allotment 1809 to Jack's heir.... More... $0 (05-31-2023 - MT)
|
|
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry Internsational Corp. v. Nearmap, U.S., Inc.; Nearmap Austrial Pty, Ltd.; and Nearmap, Ltd.
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property law lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in patent infringement throries.
In this patent infringement case, Plaintiffs Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. (collectively, “EagleView”) filed a motion to compel Defendant Nearmap US, Inc.[1] to supplement its discovery responses in two areas.[2] First, Eag... More... $0 (05-18-2023 - UT)
|
|
Michael W. Hayes, Jr. v. Transportation Insurance Company, et al.
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendants on auto negligence and medical malpractice theories.
On October 10, 2018, plaintiff was injured when a tortfeasor stuck plaintiff's vehicle from behind. Dkt. # 2-1, at 2. Plaintiff's vehicle was owned by his employer, and plaintiff was operating it within the scope of his employment at the time of the incident. Id. Pl... More... $0 (05-16-2023 - OK)
|
|
B.E. Technology, LLC v. Twitter, Inc. and Google, LLC
|
|
Wilmington, Delaware patent infringement lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants claiming that they were violating "United States Patent Nos, 8,549,410 (“the '410 patent”), 8,549,411 (“the '411 patent”), and 8,769,440 (“the '440 patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents”). D.1.1. All of the /Asserted Patents expired in 2018. D.I. 67 at 2.
The PT AB issued Fi... More... $0 (05-16-2023 - DE)
|
|
Christopher Sadowski v. Impcto Latin New,s Inc., d/b/a Impacto Latino
|
|
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.
Copyright infringement is the use of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner. Copyright infringement can take many forms, including:
Copying or distributing a copyrighted work without permission.
Performing or di... More... $0 (05-12-2023 - NY)
|
|
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. WINSTON WHITECROW BRESTER
|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking dismissal of his conviction in Case No. CF-2018-298
¶1 This is a consolidated appeal of orders issued by the District Court of Ottawa County, the Honor... More... $0 (05-11-2023 - OK)
|
|
Kathryn Townsend Griffin, et al. v. Edward Christopher Sheeran a/k/a "Ed Sheeran," et al.
|
|
New York, New York civil litigation lawyers represented plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories under 17 U.S.C. 101.
Plaintiff Structured Asset Sales, LLC, as a beneficial owner of the copyright to the 1973 hit song "Let's Get It On," brings this action against Defendants Edward Christopher Sheeran, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BDi Music Ltd., Bucks Music Grou... More... $0 (05-04-2023 - NY)
|
|
Noah Lebowitz v. Harmoney Nutraceuticals, LLC
|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:
(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, dis... More... $0 (04-26-2023 - OK)
|
|
Bobby Nunn v. NFL Enterprises, LLC
|
|
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement law theory.
"
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter asking the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (ECF No. 19.) This is the fifth request for an extension of Defendants' deadline. (See ECF Nos. 11, ... More... $0 (04-11-2023 - NY)
|
|
Danny Lamont Chambers; Dontell Rayvon-Eddie Smith v. Ronald Sanders; City of Detroit, Michigan
|
|
Danny Lamont Chambers and Dontell Rayvon-Eddie Smith allege that Detective Ronald Sanders and his employer, the City of Detroit, violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to familial integrity by procuring the wrongful
conviction and incarceration of their father, Danny Burton. Even assuming that the plaintiffs
have identified a substantive right protected by the Due Process Clause, thei... More... $0 (04-03-2023 - MI)
|
|
Just Between Friends Franchise System, Inc. v. Samone Gibson Enterprises, LLC et al
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.
15 U.S.C. 1114 provides:
(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution... More... $0 (03-29-2023 - OK)
|
|
Denise Trlica, et al. v. Entertainment Tonite, L.C.
|
|
Davenport, Iowa Lanham Act lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Trademark Infringement Act violation theories claiming $940,000 in damages.
The Lanham Act also provides federal causes of action for trademark dilution, cybersquatting, and several unfair competition claims, such as unregistered trademark infringement (including claims for infringement of unregistered trade d... More... $0 (03-28-2023 - AZ)
|
|
Emelike Nwosuocha v. Donald McKinely Glover, II
|
|
New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.... More... $0 (03-24-2023 - NY)
|
|
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc.
|
|
Wichita, Kansas intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued defendant on a trademark infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory.
Federal Courthouse - Wichita, Kansas
More... $0 (03-21-2023 - KS)
|
Kirk Johnson v. Chad Kroeger, et al.
|
|
Austin, Texas intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on a copyright infringement theory.
Plaintiff Kirk Johnston brought this copyright infringement suit against Chad Kroeger, Michael Kroeger, Ryan Peake, Daniel Adair, Roadrunner Records, Inc., and Warner Chappell Music, Inc. Defendants are the individual members of the group Nickelback and the record ... More... $0 (03-16-2023 - TX)
|
|
United States of America v. Bill Omar Carrasquillo
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with criminal copyright infringement scheme.
Federal Courthouse - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
More... $0 (03-09-2023 - PA)
|
Dexon Computer, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurane contract claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of Defendant's wrongful denial of its claim.
 More... $0 (02-16-2023 - MN)
|
State of Texas v. Alvaro R. Garia
|
|
Brownsville, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with tampering with government records.
Cameron County Courthouse - Brownsville, Texas
More... $0 (02-16-2023 - TX)
|
Nick Koudis v. Kaufman Health and Hormone Center, LLC
|
|
Denver, Colorado intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.
Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado
More... $0 (02-10-2023 - CO)
|
Hermes v. Mason Rothchild
|
|
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a Lanham Act violation trademark infringement theory claiming that Defendant's 'MetaBirkins' non-fungible tokens, handing Paris fashion house Hermes a victory in a closely watched dispute that could impact future conduct in the world of fashion and NFTs.
More... $0 (02-07-2023 - NY)
|
United States of America v. Michael Eugene Spears
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with murder in the second degree in Indian Country.
Federal Courthouse - Tulsa, Oklahoma
More... $0 (01-31-2023 - OK)
|
David Hills v. Corridor Wine, Inc., TWFS, Inc. and Retail Services and Systems, Inc.
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a copyright infringement theory.
The United States copyright law is contained i... More... $0 (01-13-2023 - MD)
|
|
Under Armour, Inc. v. Armorina, Inc.
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1051.
How are trademarks enfo... More... $0 (01-13-2023 - MD)
|
|
Steven Markos v. Wrenegade Sports, LLC, d/b/a Farm To Fork Adventures
|
|
Albany, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 101.
Copyright infringement is the use or ... More... $1 (01-13-2023 - NY)
|
Next Page
|
 Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|