| Nuisance Law |
| |
|
Peters K. Lashmet, II v. Continental Realty Corporation
|
|
Charleston, South Carolina persnal injury lawyer reprsented the Plaintiff on a premises liability law theory.
this case was filed in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 2024CP1002190, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
In South Carolina, premises liability law holds property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries sustained by visitors due to unsaf... More... $0 (06-24-2025 - SC)
|
|
Elane Vega v. Walmart Stores East, L.P., et al.
|
|
Port Charlotte, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
* * *
Florida Premises liability law summary
Florida Premises Liability Law Summary:
1. General Principle:
Property owners in Florida have a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injuries to la... More... $0 (06-20-2025 - FL)
|
|
Chong Pak v. Claire Dixon
|
|
Oakland, California civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a commercial lease dispute.
Plaintiff Chong Pak owns a warehouse property at 2825 West Street in Oakland. He filed this action against one James Koch, alleged to be a commercial tenant of the property with a three-year lease. Pak alleged that in violation of the lease and local law, the property was being used for re... More... $0 (05-19-2025 - CA)
|
|
360 East 72nd Street Owners Inc. v. Subrina Wolkoff
|
|
New York City, New York condominium law lawyers represented the parties is a dispute over the enforcement of house rule.
Plaintiff cooperative waived the house rule prohibiting pit bulls in the building under Administrative Code of City of NY § 27-2009.1 and held the motion and cross-motion for summary judgment in abeyance pending a hearing to determine whether the nuisance exception und... More... $0 (01-21-2025 - NY)
|
|
Carri Roux, et al. v. Jacob N. Coffey, et al.
|
|
Hartford, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory.
The plaintiffs commenced the present action in December, 2022. In count four of the complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant[3] ''owned, leased, rented, controlled, possessed, operated, managed, and/ or maintained the premises at 61 Savitt Way, Hartford,'' which is known as the Xfin... More... $0 (01-14-2025 - CT)
|
|
Stephen Sawyer, et al. v. Trustees(s) of the Patricia A. Boland Trust Aggrement Dated Jun 4, 2012
|
|
Hastings, Minnesota civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a real property dispute.
The Sawyers and the Boland Trustees dispute ownership of an 8.5' by 117' strip of land on the east side of the Boland Trustees' property and the west side of the Sawyers' property (the Adverse Possession Parcel).
In 1966, the Boland family acquired property on Lake Marion (the Bolan... More... $0 (01-06-2025 - MN)
|
|
Paul Phillips Bardos and Mary L. Bardos v. Robert L. Spoklie
|
|
Kalispell, Montana real property lawyers represented the parties in a dispute over the use of an easement.
Bardos sued for injunctive relief, asserting trespass, nuisance, and quiet title actions against Spoklie regarding the two easements, and requested a temporary restraining order. The District Court denied the request and set a show cause hearing for issuance of a preliminary inj... More... $0 (11-19-2024 - MT)
|
|
Hudgins, et al. v. Lowe Construction and Development, LLC, et al.
|
Monroe, Georgia civil litigation breach of contract lawyers represented the parties in a construction dispute.
As part of their sales transaction, the Hudginses executed a New Construction Purchase and Sale Agreement ("the Purchase Agreement") relating to the sale of Lot 9 and construction of a new home on the property. Paragraph 12 (b) of the contract addressed the par... More... $0 (11-15-2024 - GA)
|
|
City of Baltirmore v. McKesson and AmerisourceBergen
|
Baltimore, Maryland lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a public nuisance theory.
The City of Baltimore claimed that the defendants oversupplied fentanyl and heroin drugs.
The defendants denied wrongdoing.
Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott shared a statement after the decision, saying, "The opioid overdose epidemic has taken a toll on every community in this c... More... $260000000 (11-13-2024 - MD)
|
|
Macon-Bibb County v. Green Meadows Housing Partners, L.P., et al.
|
Macon, Georgia public nuisance complaint real property lawyer represented the Defendant.
On August 4, 2023, the County filed a complaint against GMHP in the Superior Court of Bibb County, seeking a declaration that the Property was a public nuisance based on the criminal activity of third parties and requesting appointment of a receiver to take control of the Property a... More... $0 (09-09-2024 - GA)
|
|
Robert A. Doane v. Tele Circuit Network Corporation
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia consumer law Federal Communications Act violation lawyer represened the Plaintiff.
Plaintiff Robert Doane filed suit in federal court against Tele Circuit Network Corporation and its sole owner Ashar Syed (“Defendants”), alleging that Defendants had unlawfully “spoofed” his phone number during a telemarketing campaign, causing Plaintiff to rece... More...
$0 (08-26-2024 - GA)
|
|
Frederick E. Oberholzer v. Simon and Toby Galapo
|
Norristown, Pennsylvania private nuscience, intrusion upon seclusion, defamation - libel and slander, publicly placing Plaintiffs in a false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Dr. Simon and Toby Galapo (appellants) own a home in Abington Township, Montgomery County, the rear yard of which borders the property of Frederick and Denise Oberholzer (app... More... $0 (08-23-2024 - PA)
|
|
Kevin Jucht v. Nathan Schulz
|
Salem, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
[¶2.] The following facts are as set out in Jucht's complaint. Schulz farms land next to Jucht. Schulz "sprayed fields adjacent to Jucht's property with a chemical mixture in such a manner as to cause severe drift on Jucht's property." "That day at around 11:07 a.... More... $0 (08-18-2024 - SD)
|
|
John Marquette and Judy Cornish v. Levi Falck and Sarrah Falck
|
Bonners Ferry, Idaho real property lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a coventant violation theory.
Levi and Sarrah Falck (the Falcks) appeal from the second amended final judgment granting injunctive relief after the district court found their activities and use of their property violated the covenants, conditions, and restrictions of Meadow Creek Estates. T... More... $0 (08-16-2024 - ID)
|
|
CORR PROPERTIES, LLC v. EVA PROCTOR AND PAUL QUINN, AS
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR EVA PROCTOR
|
|
Jackson, MS civil defense lawyer represented the appellant with challenging the chancery court’s rulings on the motions for attorney’s fees
¶2. On August 27, 2020, Corr Properties purchased a parcel of real property loca... More... $0 (08-06-2024 - MS)
|
|
Lessie Benningfield Randle, et al. v. City of Tulsa, et al.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot.
Plaintiffs, survivors of the Tulsa Race Massacre, brought suit against Defendants seeking abatement of the public nuisance caused by Defendants' unreasonable, unwarranted, and/or unlawful... More... $0 (06-12-2024 - OK)
|
|
Yolanda Tart v. Union Public Schools, et al.
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent herself on an a bullying theory.
GREENOUGH, KELLY M: CASE COMES ON FOR NON-JURY TRIAL. WINSTON BROWN, COURT REPORTER. YOLANDA TART PLAINTIFF PRESENT APPEARS AS PRO SE. DEFENDANT EMILY BABB PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY PRESTON BENNETT.
COURT HEARD PLAINTIFFS-COUNTER DEFENDANT CASE IN CHIEF, SIX (6) WITNESSES SWORN AND TESTIMONY TAKEN. ... More... $0 (03-28-2024 - ok)
|
|
Stephanie Rein v. Walmart, Inc.
|
|
East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Franklin County, Illinois, case number 22-LA-56, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
(740 ILCS 130/1)
Sec. 1. This Act is called and may be cited as the "Premises Liability Act".
S... More... $1 (03-20-2024 - IL)
|
|
Elizabeth Flores v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
|
|
Rock Island, Illinois personal injury slip and fall law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability Negligence theory.
(740 ILCS 130/2) (from Ch. 80, par. 302)
(Text of Section WITH the changes made by P.A. 89-7, which has been held unconstitutional)
Sec. 2. The distinction under the common law between invitees and licensees as to the duty owed by an... More... $0 (02-23-2024 - IL)
|
|
Yasmin Sanchez v. Sam's East, Inc., dba Sam's Club, et al.
|
|
Knoxville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Knox County Circuit Court, 1-283-22, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
Tennessee premises liability law governs when a property owner or occupier can be held responsible for injuries that occur on their ... More... $1 (01-18-2024 - TN)
|
|
Sarah Hohenberg, et aux. v. Shelby County, Tennessee
|
|
Memphis, Tennessee real property law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory.
Hohenberg and Hanson owned homes in Memphis, Tennessee. They did not maintain them. Hohenberg failed to make repairs after a tree struck her roof. Hanson let the grass, weeds, and other plants grow wild and allowedtrash, debris, and personal prop... More... $0 (01-15-2024 - TN)
|
|
Nicholas Wooten v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al.
|
|
Tyler, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.
Key Principles:
Duty of care: Texas property owners or occupiers owe a duty of care to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition for invitees and licensees. This means taking reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm.
Invitees... More... $0 (01-12-2024 - TX)
|
|
Joseph Ledet v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
|
|
Beaumont, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was field in the County Court at Law One, Jefferson County, TX, 0136937, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
Texas Premises Liability Law:
Key Principles:
Duty of care: Texas property owner... More... $1 (01-12-2024 - TX)
|
|
Rentia Wallace v. Fiesta Mart, LLC
|
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 193rd Judicial District, Dallas County, Texas, DC-22-05518, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
Texas Premises Liability Law Overview
Key Principles:
Duty of care: Texas prop... More... $1 (01-11-2024 - TX)
|
|
Maria Perez v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., d/b/a Dollar General, et al.
|
|
Sherman, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 431st Judicial District Court, Denton County, Texa, 23-01425-431, and was removed to federal court by Dollar General.
Plaintiff filed a motion seeking remand to the state court.
Texas Premises Liability... More... $0 (01-09-2024 - TX)
|
Next Page
|
