This is the third chapter in our appellate review of this controversy, which
involves the wrongful denial of unemployment benefits by respondents Employment
Development Department (EDD) and the California Unemployment Insurance Board
(Board). After both EDD and the Board rejected a claim for unemployment benefits filed
by Jose Robles—and the trial court denied Robles’s petitio

Plaintiff and appellant Christopher Potter (Potter) was
injured by Jesus Remedios Avalos-Tovar (Tovar) in an auto
accident. Tovar was insured by defendant and respondent
Alliance United Insurance Company (AUIC), with a maximum
liability limit of $15,000. Potter offered to settle personal injury
claims against Tovar for his policy limit, but AUIC did not
respond to the offer

This appeal arises from a wrongful death action brought by
Karen Hernandez and Sergio Saravia (appellants), the parents of
13-year-old Jonathan Hernandez, after Jonathan was struck and
killed by a school bus while riding his bicycle in Glendale. The
school bus was owned by defendant and respondent First
Student, Inc., and driven by defendant and respondent Barbara
Calderon.

We granted review to decide whether a household
member’s income that is used to pay child support for a child
living in another household counts as income “reasonably
anticipated” to be “received” by the paying household within the
meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 11265.2 for
purposes of determining eligibility for state welfare benefits.
The California Depa

¶1 (Plaintiffs in error will be designated plaintiffs, and defendants in error, defendants.) The plaintiffs are minor children of A. P. Cash, suing through their legal guardian, A. F. Pyeatt, the purpose of which suit is to have canceled certain conveyances to the lands involved, which comprise the allotments of said minors and their deceased mother. Briefly stated, the grounds of recovery alleged

¶1 Charles D. Croslin,1 Glenn Croslin, and Irma Jean Gowin (plaintiffs) sued Enerlex, Inc. (defendant) seeking rescission of mineral deeds and tort damages. The dispositive issues on certiorari are: 1) whether the summary judgment record on appeal establishes that defendant owed the plaintiffs a duty to disclose the pooling order and the accrued mineral proceeds when it made an unsolicited offer t

¶1 The defendant in error, Merry X. Ball, hereafter referred to as "plaintiff", instituted this action on December 7, 1953, against the plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as "defendants" or by name, to recover an undivided 2/9ths interest in the estate of Dewey W. Smith, her deceased father who died intestate in 1942 a resident of Cotton County, Oklahoma, and for an accounting in connectio

Martinez and Juanita met in 2008, and in 2010, Juanita gave birth to their son,
A.L. Their relationship ended when A.L. was three years’ old, but Martinez had
possession of A.L. as he desired, which was almost every weekend. By October 2014,2 Juanita intended to seek sole custody of A.L. She filed a
custody petition in which she expressed concern about the possible international

The Knox County Grand Jury charged the defendant with aggravated burglary and theft of property valued at $1,000 or more but less than $10,000 in relation to the burglary of and theft of items from the home of Phillip Crye on May 29, 2014.
At the June 2016 trial, Mr. Crye testified that his wife telephoned him on the day of the offense to let him know �that there had been a break-in at� th