Edith Rogers appeals from her removal as administrator of the estate of her
grandfather Roscoe Sapp, Sr. (decedent), who died in 1994. Armuress Sapp and Brian
Lincoln, two of decedent’s grandsons, separately petitioned to remove Rogers as
administrator. The probate court found Rogers (1) had failed to comply with the court’s
2001 instructions that she and her coadministrator (who d

¶1 The defendant in error, Merry X. Ball, hereafter referred to as "plaintiff", instituted this action on December 7, 1953, against the plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as "defendants" or by name, to recover an undivided 2/9ths interest in the estate of Dewey W. Smith, her deceased father who died intestate in 1942 a resident of Cotton County, Oklahoma, and for an accounting in connectio

This case arises out of a van-versus-motorcycle accident
between plaintiff and respondent Thyme Lewis and defendant
and appellant Aleksandr Ukran.1 Following a bench trial, the
trial judge found Ukran negligently caused the accident and
awarded Lewis total damages of $1,651,702.39 for past medical
expenses and past lost earnings, loss of future earning capacity,
and future

Following a bench trial the court entered judgment and
granted an injunction in favor of Glenn Eisen and Alison Eisen,
finding that Ardeshir Tavangarian, Tania Tavangarian and
619 Properties, LLC had violated the view protection provisions
of paragraphs 1 and 11 of the covenants, conditions and
restrictions (CC&R’s) applicable to the parties’ neighboring
properties in the M

Christopher Ross appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the
County of Riverside on Ross's claims for violation of Labor Code section 1102.5 and for
violation of the provisions in the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900
et seq.; FEHA) prohibiting disability discrimination, failure to reasonably accommodate,
failure to engage in the interactive process,

Following a bench trial the court entered judgment and
granted an injunction in favor of Glenn Eisen and Alison Eisen,
finding that Ardeshir Tavangarian, Tania Tavangarian and
619 Properties, LLC had violated the view protection provisions
of paragraphs 1 and 11 of the covenants, conditions and
restrictions (CC&R’s) applicable to the parties’ neighboring
properties in the M