¶1 Appellant Willie Vern Frazier, Jr. appeals his Judgment and Sentence from the District Court of Okmulgee County, Case No. CF-2016-491, for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon, After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies (Count 1), in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 1283(A); Possession of Controlled Dangerous Substance (Hydrocodone/Methamphetamine), After Former Conviction

Detroit, MI - The United States of America charged Edward �Nick� Robinson with conspiring to embezzle union funds and tax evasion.

Edward �Nick� Robinson, the former President of the United Auto Workers Midwest CAP and the former Director of the UAW Labor and Employment Training Corporation, pleaded guilty today to conspiring with other UAW officials to embezzle over $1 million of

Atlanta, GA - The United States of America charged Eun Soo Kim with participating in a bid rigging conspiracy.

Eun Soo Kim, a former key accounts manager for Continental Automotive Korea Ltd. and a Korean national, was extradited from Germany and pleaded guilty for his role in an international market allocation and bid-rigging conspiracy involving the sale of instrument panel clusters to

This is the fourth appeal in this longstanding lawsuit, and
challenges a $7 million default judgment entered after the trial
court issued terminating sanctions. Among the many issues
raised by the parties on appeal, three present significant legal
questions: (1) May a trial court issue terminating sanctions when
the discovery a party contumaciously refuses to provide
encomp

Bangor, ME - The United States of America charged Cody Lyon with threatening a federal agent.

A Manchester, Maine man pleaded guilty in federal court in Bangor to threatening a federal agent.

Cody Lyon, 24, pleaded guilty to three counts of transmitting threatening interstate communications.

According to court records, in May and June 2019, agents with the Food and Drug

Philadelphia, PA - The United States of America charged Sandoz, Inc. with antitrust crimes.

Sandoz Inc., a generic pharmaceutical company headquartered in New Jersey, was charged for conspiring to allocate customers, rig bids, and fix prices for generic drugs, the Department of Justice announced. A four-count felony charge was filed today in the United States District Court for the Easte

Appellant HGST, Inc. (HGST) filed an action against the County of Santa Clara
(the County) seeking a refund for business property taxes paid on machinery, equipment,
fixtures, and other personal property located in San Jose. Among other things, HGST
claimed the Santa Clara County Assessment Appeals Board (the AAB) erroneously
overassessed the value of the property. After a four-day

Norman, OK - Terah Marie Devine sued Chubb, a/k/a Chubb Insurance Solutions Agenecy Inc,
f/k/a Ace American Insurance Company on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

On April 10, 2017, S.H. went to a hospital emergency room
with “excruciating back pain.” A hospital emergency room
physician called Doctor Adebukola Onibokun for assistance.
Onibokun is the owner of SJN, a company that provides medical
treatment and care. Onibokun consulted with S.H. and
determined she had “lumbar disc herniations at 2 levels.” On the
same day, he performed

Tulsa, OK - The United States of America charged Hongjin Tan with stealing propriety information.

A former associate scientist was sentenced Thursday in federal court for stealing proprietary information worth more than $1 billion from his employer, a U.S. petroleum company.

In November 2019, Tan pleaded guilty to theft of a trade secret, unauthorized transmission of a trade secr

Kansas City, KS - The United States of America sued Trina Health–Wichita NW, LLC and Jack West on a False Claims Act theory for submitting false claims to Medicare and TRICARE.

Trina Health–Wichita NW, LLC, located in Wichita, Kan., and Jack West of Dallas, Texas, one of the company’s principals, agreed to pay the United States $775,000 to resolve allegations that they violated the False

Forty years ago, Congress recognized that refugees fleeing imminent persecution do not have the luxury of choosing their escape route into the United States. It mandated equity in its treatment of all refugees, however they arrived.1
This principle is embedded in the Refugee Act of 1980, which established an asylum procedure available to any migrant, “irrespective of such alien’s status,” and

Petitioner Erika Jisela Yanez-Pena seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. Yanez-Pena maintains that, in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Pereira v. Sessions,1 a notice to appear (“NTA”) is defective if it does not include the time and place of the initial hearing. She argues that the NTA she received was def

Sells Reed III sued the City of Los Angeles for injuries he
sustained when he rode his bicycle into a rope attached to a
badminton net stretched across a paved path in MacArthur
Park.
1 The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary
judgment on multiple independent grounds: Reed’s suit was
barred by the doctrine of trail immunity (Gov. Code, § 831.4), no
negligen

¶1 Defendant in error, Fielding D. Haas, referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings against S.J. Sarkeys, an individual, and Sarkeys, Inc., a corporation, referred to as defendants, to recover attorney's fee allegedly due him. Plaintiff's action was predicated on the grounds that he had, at the request of defendants and each of them, commenced to perform and did perform professional services

¶1 The issue presented for certiorari review concerns the circumstances under which a trial court can award an attorney's fee to a plaintiff who prevails on his claim and defendants' counterclaims following transfer of the case from the small claims docket to the district court civil docket. More particularly, we are asked to determine whether an attorney's fee can be awarded under 12 O.S.2001 § 1

¶0 1. APPEAL AND ERROR - Supreme Court Without Jurisdiction to Determine Questions of Fact and Law New and Different From Those Involved When Case Presented on Appeal.
In an appellate proceeding the Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction to try and determine questions of fact and law new and different from those involved in the case when it was presented on appeal.
2. MECHANICS'

Califia Farms, LLC (Califia) manufactures and distributes
a “100% Tangerine Juice” known as “Cuties Juice.” The front
label of the juice’s bottle depicts a smiling tangerine coming out
of its peel. Above the tangerine, the label prominently displays
the word “Cuties”; below the tangerine and on three lines of
1 We draw the facts set forth below from the allegations in
the o

Seattle, WA - The United States of America charged Joey A. Maillet with:

Theft of Firearm from Federal Firearms Licensee - 18:922(u) and 924(i)(1)
(1-2)

The suspect in the theft of nearly 40 firearms from two different gun stores pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to two counts of theft of firearms from a federal firearms licensee, announced U.S. Attorn

A trial court may certify a class in a proposed class action
lawsuit only if, among other things, the court finds a “‘community
of interest’” among the proposed class members (Duran v. U.S.
Bank National Assn. (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1, 28 (Duran)), which in
part means that “‘“common questions of law or fact”’”
“‘“predominate”’” because “the elements necessary to establish
liabil