Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo d/b/a Collectively RDI Global Services and R&D International v. Alliance Riggers & Constructors, LTD El Paso County Courthouse - El Paso, Texas |
Appellants, Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo d/b/a Collectively RDI Global Services and R & D International, appeal from a judgment awarding damages in the amount of $125,775 to Appellee, Alliance Riggers & Constructors, Ltd. (Alliance Riggers).1 We affirm. |
United States of America v. Alfred Bradley Adkins Federal Courthouses - Eastern District of Kentucky - Lexington, Kentucky |
Lexington, KY - Former Clinical Psychologist Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison for Role in $550 Million Social Security Fraud Scheme |
United States of America v. David H. Brooks Federal Courthouse - Albany, New York |
13 On September 14, 2010, David H. Brooks was convicted in the United |
Teresa Lynn Allen v. John J. Harrison, D.O. |
¶1 This is a medical malpractice case premised in part on the doctrine of informed consent. The issue presented on certiorari review is whether the doctrine of informed consent requires a physician to obtain the patient's consent before implementing a nonsurgical or noninvasive course of treatment. Inherent in the question presented, is whether a physician-in addition to discussing with the patien $0 (04-19-2016 - OK) |
THOMAS C. KENKEL, M.D. and ROBERT GOLD, M.D., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. JOSEPH PARKER a/k/a JOSEPH G. PARKER, Defendant/Appellant, and ROBERT BLANKENSHIP, M.D., CHRIS M. BOXWELL, M.D., WILLIAM BURNETT, M.D., JOHN CATTANEAO, M.D., ERIC ENGLES, M.D., MARSHA HOWERTON, M.D., FRANK FORE, M.D., BARBARA FRIES M.D., E. BRADLEY GARBER, M.D, ROBERT GARRETT, M.D., JOEY MANDUANO, D.O., WILLIAM SAWYER, M.D., VICKI BAKER, M.D., LANCE MILLER, M.D., Plaintiffs/Third Party Defendants/Intervenors. |
¶1 The issue presented is whether shareholders, uninvolved in the management of a bankrupt corporation which was without workers' compensation insurance, may be held personally liable for a workers' compensation court award to an employee. We hold that, under such circumstances, shareholders cannot be held personally liable for the payment of the employee's workers' compensation award. |
United States of America v. Shayne Parker Federal Courthouse - Boston, Massachusetts |
Sometime on or around March 22, 2014 — all dates here |
United States of America v. Gregory R. Logan Federal Courthouse - Portland, Maine |
Portland, ME - Former Canadian Mountie Sentenced to Money Laundering Charges Stemming from a Conspiracy to Smuggle Ivory Tusks |
Christopher A. Brown v. LaFerry's LP Gas Co., Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Denver, Colorado |
Christopher A. Brown sued LaFerry’s LP Gas Company, Inc. (“LaFerry’s”) for |
OPY I, LLC v. First American Title Insurance Company, Inc. |
¶1 This case arises out of a title insurance coverage dispute between Plaintiff/Appellant OPY I, L.L.C. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant/Appellee First American Title Insurance Company, Inc. ("Defendant"). Plaintiff, an Oklahoma limited liability company, appeals from summary judgment granted in Defendant's favor. |
United States of America v. Serge Francois and Patrick Tonge Federal Courthouse - Miami, Florida |
Miami, FL - Pharmacist And His Employee Convicted Of Over $30 Million Health Care Fraud Against Military Insurance Program |
Hart Industrial Supply Company v. Cleo Craig and Louis Yarmuk |
¶0 1. EVIDENCE -- Parol evidence rule -- Application. The rule which excludes parol evidence when offered to contradict or vary the terms, provisions, or legal effect of written instruments has no application to collateral undertakings or cases in which the written instrument was executed in part performance of an entire oral agreement. |
United States of America v. Essential Oils, L.C. Federal Courthouse - Salt Lake City, Utah |
Salt Lake City, UT - Essential Oils Company Sentenced for Lacey Act and Endangered Species Act Violations to Pay $760,000 in Fines, Forfeiture, and Community Service, and to Implement a Comprehensive Compliance Plan |
Hart Industrial Supply Company v. Craig |
¶0 1. EVIDENCE -- Parol evidence rule -- Application. The rule which excludes parol evidence when offered to contradict or vary the terms, provisions, or legal effect of written instruments has no application to collateral undertakings or cases in which the written instrument was executed in part performance of an entire oral agreement. |
A.A. Murphy, Inc. v. Banfield |
¶0 1. In an action upon a negotiable promissory note, when the defendant-obligor admits the execution of the instrument and the amount due thereon, but by answer and counterclaim seeks to rescind the obligation, pursuant to which the note was executed, on the ground of fraud practiced upon him, tenders the benefits received under the contract, prays for restitution of money or property previously $0 (07-25-1961 - OK) |
Douglas v. Douglas |
¶0 1. CONTRACTS - Failure to comply with promises to give mortgage is not "failure of consideration" such as to authorize rescission of deed. |
Wiley Hubbard and Vincent Nueggenborg v. Anny R. Broycson |
¶1 This action was instituted on March 5, 1965, by Ann R. Bryson, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Wiley Hubbard and Vincent Mueggenborg, hereinafter referred to as defendants, wherein plaintiff sought to cancel, vacate and set aside a purported agreement, hereinafter referred to, and to quiet title in plaintiff covering 160 acres of land in Canadian County, Oklahoma, described as the $0 (11-30--0001 - OK) |
L.Z. Gentry d/b/a Gentry Enterprises, Inc. v. American Motorist Insurance Company |
¶1 In 1982, L.Z. Gentry, appellee/counter-appellant, began planning to construct a condominium project known as Rockwell Gardens. He contacted his insurance agent, Tom Lanthrop, agent for American Motorists Insurance Co., appellant/counter-appellee, concerning the purchase of an all-risk policy. Gentry had done business with Lanthrop as his insurance agent since about 1972. Gentry specifically ask $0 (01-18-1994 - OK) |
Barry v. Orahood |
¶0 1. FRAUD--Nondisclosure of facts constituting fraud. |
David Bruce McDermott v. Sentry Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Steven A. Marzett |
¶1 We review this matter on reassignment from the Oklahoma Supreme Court pursuant to its order of April 12, 1999, vacating our opinion issued June 9, 1998, and directing us to reconsider this cause based upon the full trial court record and additional briefs submitted since the date of our opinion. Based on reconsideration of the record, the parties' briefs, the amicus brief submitted by the Unite $0 (01-24-2001 - OK) |
Norman J. Coble v. Melinda Bowers, First State Bank and First Life Assurance Company |
¶1 Plaintiff Norman J. Coble appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of defendants Melinda Bowers, First State Bank, and First Life Assurance Co. Defendant Security Life Assurance Co. was dismissed without prejudice prior to judgment and is not a party to this appeal. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. |
United States of America v. Austin A. Kaquatosh, Mitchell E. Oshkosh and Woody Nahquaddy Federal Courthouse - Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
Milwaukee, WI - Trafficking Synthetic Cannabinoids on Menominee Indian Reservation Leads to Prison Sentences for Three Men |
David Hovannisian v. First American Title Insurance Company |
David and Linda Hovannisian purchased property from Wells Fargo Bank (Wells |
United States of America v. Sylvia Toolie and Peggy Akeya Federal Courthouse - Anchorage, Alaska |
Anchorage, AK - Sisters Sentenced for Embezzlement from Indian Tribal Government |
United States of America v. Dmitry Fedoseev Federal Courthouse - Los Angeles, California |
Los Angeles, CA - Fifth Defendant Sentenced to Federal Prison for Credit Card Fraud and Identity Theft Related to Cyberattacks on 3 U.S. Companies |
Edward Tuffly, a/k/a Bud Tuffly v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - San Francisco, California |
Edward “Bud” Tuffly, the treasurer of the National |
Next Page |