| Justin Hooper v. The City of Tulsa |
|
Justin Hooper and the City of Tulsa dispute whether the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495 (1898), grants Tulsa jurisdiction over municipal violations committed by all Tulsa’s inhabitants, including Indians, in Indian country. Tulsa issued a traffic citation to Mr. Hooper, an Indian and member of the Choctaw Nation, and he paid a $150 fine for the ticket in Tulsa’s Municipal Criminal Court (“municipal $0 (06-28-2023 - OK) |
| MARVIN KEITH STITT, Appellant v. THE CITY OF TULSA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Marvin Keith Stitt, was convicted of Aggravated Speeding (Tulsa, Okla., Rev. Ordinances Title 37, § 617(C) (2021)) following a non-jury trial before the Honorable Mitchell McCune, Municipal Judge, and fined $250.00 in City of Tulsa Municipal Court Citation/Case No. 7569655. |
| CITY OF TULSA, Appellant v. NICHOLAS RYAN O'BRIEN, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellee, Nicholas Ryan O'Brien, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa with the following misdemeanor traffic crimes: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Eddie Godwin, Jr. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Count # 1. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Ashton Elizabeth Allen |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Amari Lashay Brown |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Robbi Barker represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Ronald Schechter v. Society Hill East Condominium Association, Inc. |
|
New Brunswick, New Jersey, pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Thomas Earl Pattison, Jr. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
| United States of America v. SGO Corporation Limited |
|
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Philippine Bribery and Money Laundering. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Zachary Arthur Youngblood |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Nasim Ghebart v. Nationwide Credit and Collection, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Act violation. |
| Kristine Roth v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
|
Detroit, Michigan, insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an E.R.I.S.A. claim. |
| Lynn K. Pierce v. Target Corporation |
|
Rochester, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim. |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Green Bay, W criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering. |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Green Bay, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering. |
| Marvin Keith Stiff v. City of Tulsa |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff who charged with driving 16-20 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Green Bay, WI criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Multimillion-Dollar Money Laundering |
| United States of America v. Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr. v. City of Oontairo, et al. |
|
San Bernardino, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
| Flying T Ranch, Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, et al. |
|
Under federal common law, Indian tribes may be sued only under two circumstances: when a tribe waives its sovereign immunity or when Congress unequivocally abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Here, Flying T Ranch (Flying T) filed suit in Snohomish County Superior Court to quiet title to nonreservation land purchased by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (Tribe). Flying T contends it had acquired $0 (10-10-2025 - WA) |
| Billy Gowans, Jr. v. Zachary Axom, et al. |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pro se Plaintiff challenged reverse mortgage executed by his Mother. |
| State of New Jersey v. Yolanda Holmes |
|
Newark, New Jersey, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with multiple counts of official isconduct and falsifying public records. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Marlon Edward Stuart |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Milwaukee, WI criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering |
| State of Oklahoma v. Janada Caldwell Johnson |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
|
Next Page |