| United States of America v. Danny Seibel |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud, making false entries in the books and records of a financial institution, obstructing the examination of a financial institution and failing to implement an anti-money laundering program. Danny Seibel, age 54, of Lindsay, Oklahoma, was the President and Chief Exec $ (12-10-2025 - OK) |
| United States of America v. Spinefrontier, Inc. |
|
Boston, Massachusetts, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with giving kickbacks in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b. An executive may have impliedly waived a corporation's attorney-client privilege by indicating his intent to invoke an "involvement-of-counsel" defense at his criminal trial. Aditya Humad, the Chief Financial Officer (CF $ (12-02-2025 - MA) |
| State of Oklahoma v. Justin Scott Olson |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with; |
| Julius H. Schoeps, et al. v. Sompo Holdings, Inc., et al. |
|
Chicago, Illinois lawyers represented the parties in a dispute over the ownership of the Van Gogh Sunflowers. |
| State of Oklahoma v. A.J.N. |
|
Tahlequah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. G.W.L. |
|
Tahlequah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Computer Sciences Corporation v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited, et al. |
|
Dallas, Texas commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a misappropriatio of trade secrets theory. |
| Justin Hooper v. The City of Tulsa |
|
Justin Hooper and the City of Tulsa dispute whether the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495 (1898), grants Tulsa jurisdiction over municipal violations committed by all Tulsa’s inhabitants, including Indians, in Indian country. Tulsa issued a traffic citation to Mr. Hooper, an Indian and member of the Choctaw Nation, and he paid a $150 fine for the ticket in Tulsa’s Municipal Criminal Court (â $0 (06-28-2023 - OK) |
| MARVIN KEITH STITT, Appellant v. THE CITY OF TULSA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Marvin Keith Stitt, was convicted of Aggravated Speeding (Tulsa, Okla., Rev. Ordinances Title 37, § 617(C) (2021)) following a non-jury trial before the Honorable Mitchell McCune, Municipal Judge, and fined $250.00 in City of Tulsa Municipal Court Citation/Case No. 7569655. |
| CITY OF TULSA, Appellant v. NICHOLAS RYAN O'BRIEN, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellee, Nicholas Ryan O'Brien, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa with the following misdemeanor traffic crimes: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Eddie Godwin, Jr. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Count # 1. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Ashton Elizabeth Allen |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Amari Lashay Brown |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Robbi Barker represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Ronald Schechter v. Society Hill East Condominium Association, Inc. |
|
New Brunswick, New Jersey, pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Thomas Earl Pattison, Jr. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
| United States of America v. SGO Corporation Limited |
|
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Philippine Bribery and Money Laundering. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Zachary Arthur Youngblood |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Nasim Ghebart v. Nationwide Credit and Collection, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Act violation. |
| Kristine Roth v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
|
Detroit, Michigan, insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an E.R.I.S.A. claim. |
| Lynn K. Pierce v. Target Corporation |
|
Rochester, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim. |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Green Bay, W criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering. |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Green Bay, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of money laundering. |
| Marvin Keith Stiff v. City of Tulsa |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff who charged with driving 16-20 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. |
| United States of America v. Cherie Campion |
|
Green Bay, WI criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Multimillion-Dollar Money Laundering |
| United States of America v. Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr. v. City of Oontairo, et al. |
|
San Bernardino, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
|
Next Page |