The four cases consolidated in this appeal involve challenges to the national do-not-call registry, which allows individuals to register their phone numbers on a national "do-not-call list" and prohibits most commercial telemarketers from calling the numbers on that list. The primary issue in this case is whether the First Amendment prevents the government from establishing an opt-in telemarket... More...   $0 (02-18-2004 - OK)

The Pittsburg County Rural Water District Number 7 (Pitt-7) is a rural county water association in Oklahoma. The City of McAlester (McAlester) is a municipality in Oklahoma. Both Pitt-7 and McAlester are subdivisions of the State of Oklahoma, and both are water providers. Pitt-7 sued McAlester and a number of other entities under: (1) 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on the claim that the defendants vio... More...   $0 (02-15-2004 - OK)

In 1998, the United States and several of the States filed a civil action against Microsoft Corporation in the District of Columbia for violations of the Sherman Act. The district court in that action found that Microsoft (1) illegally maintained a monopoly in the market of "licensing of all Intel-compatible PC operating systems worldwide," (2) attempted to monopolize a "putative browser m... More...   $0 (01-18-2004 - MD)

Plaintiffs are California card clubs and charities that are prohibited under California state law from offering casinostyle gaming. They challenge the validity of compacts entered into under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ("IGRA"), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721, between the State of California and certain Indian tribes. Pursuant to an amendment to the California Constitution that permits casin... More...   $0 (12-23-2003 - CA)

Petitioner Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corporation, doing business as "Red and White Fleet" (Red and White), competes against its sole and dominant competitor, real party in interest Blue and Gold Fleet, Inc. and affiliated entities (collectively, Blue & Gold), in providing regularly scheduled sightseeing tours on San Francisco Bay (bay cruises). Red and White filed an antitrust lawsuit agai... More...   $0 (12-17-2003 - CA)

Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. ("Digital Images") brought this private antitrust action, with supplemental state law claims, against Tektronix Inc. ("Tektronix") and Avid Technology, Inc. ("Avid"), collectively ("defendants"). Pursuant to defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court dismissed Digital Images' antitrust and promissory estoppel claims, as well as some of its fraud and... More...   $0 (12-16-2003 - CA)

This appeal arises from an action brought by John M. (Jack) Bell and John Robert (Bob) Bell against Fur Breeders Agricultural Cooperative and its former directors and members of the board of directors. The Bells allege that while they were members of the cooperative, Fur Breeders committed antitrust violations pursuant to Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act), 15 U.S.C. § 1, and ... More...   $0 (11-11-2003 - UT)

Anti-trust claims by McKenzie-Willamette Hospital against PeaceHealth, Oregon Region, alleging price discrimination and attempted monopolization of the Oregon health care market. Plaintiff claimed that PeaceHealth charged regional insurers different rates for the same services in an effort to monopolize the market. McKenzie-Willamette is a 114-bed hospital which was rebuffed when it attempted to ... More...   $14600000 (11-07-2003 - OR)

Antioch produces and markets a scrapbook album under the trademark "CREATIVE MEMORIES" that has several distinctive features. The album utilizes a dual strap-hinge design that permits the pages to lie flat when the album is open, facilitates the turning of the pages, and enables the easy insertion of additional pages. Another design element of the CREATIVE MEMORIES album is its spine cover that... More...   $0 (10-20-2003 - OH)

The Pittsburg County Rural Water District Number 7 (Pitt-7) is a rural county water association in Oklahoma. The City of McAlester (McAlester) is a municipality in Oklahoma. Both Pitt-7 and McAlester are subdivisions of the State of Oklahoma, and both are water providers. Pitt-7 sued McAlester and a number of other entities under: (1) 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on the claim that the defendants vio... More...   $0 (10-20-2003 - OK)

¶ 1 We decide here if the trial judge erred in awarding $375,000.00 in attorney fees to plaintiffs/appellees in their class action suit brought against defendant/appellant, Sight `n Sound Appliance Centers, Inc., d/b/a Sight `n Sound & Cost Warehouse under the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act (OCPA), 15 O.S.1991, § 751 et seq., as amended.1 We hold the trial judge erred, and the Court of Civil ... More...   $0 (09-16-2003 - OK)

This case involves the nature of permissible competitive practices in the airline industry under the antitrust laws of this country, centered around the hub-and-spoke system of American Airlines. The United States brought this suit against AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., and American Eagle Holding Corporation ("American"), alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization through p... More...   $0 (07-07-2003 - KS)

Antitrust claims by AOL which accused Microsoft of using its monopoly power to hobble the Netscape browser. ... More...   $750000000 (05-30-2003 - NY)

Defendant William Cirocco, M.D., appeals the district court's permanent injunction enforcing a noncompetition covenant of his employment contract with plaintiff Bruce D. Graham, M.D., P.A. Bruce Graham, a colorectal surgeon, has practiced in the Kansas City area since 1987, doing business as Bruce D. Graham, M.D., P.A.. In 1994, finding he had more work than he could do, Graham recruited Cirocc... More...   $0 (05-14-2003 - KS)

This class action suit claimed that Microsoft Corporation was in violation of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (the Florida DTPA). Plaintiffs in the class action suit against Microsoft Corporation alleged that Microsoft established a monopoly in the market for operation systems software through various anticompetitive acts and has maintained this monopoly since the late 1980's... More...   $202000000 (04-16-2003 - FL)

This antitrust case involves the market for small business local telephone services in the Seattle/Tacoma area. Defendant-Appellee Qwest, formerly known as “U S West,” owns the local telephone network in 14 western states, including Washington. In addition to selling basic flat-rate business lines, Qwest also sells “Centrex,” a product offering volume discounted phone... More...   $0 (03-31-2003 - CA)

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company ("3M") appeals from the District Court's order entered March 14, 2000, declining to overturn the jury's verdict for LePage's in its suit against 3M under Section 2 of the Sherman Act ("§ 2"). 3M raises various objections to the trial court's decision but essentially its position is a legal one: it contends that a plaintiff cannot succeed in a § 2 m... More...   $68486697 (03-25-2003 - PA)

In the Copyright Act, Congress sought to benefit the public by encouraging artists' creative expression. Congress carefully drew the contours of copyright protection to achieve this goal. It granted artists the exclusive right to the original expression in their works, thereby giving them a financial incentive to create works to enrich our culture.1 But it denied artists the exclusive righ... More...   $0 (03-20-2003 - CA)

These are the relevant and undisputed facts. Plaintiff Anthony Con... More...   $0 (03-18-2003 - NJ)

Real estate agents make a living matching buyers and sellers. Up-to-date information about properties on the market is a must. Long gone are the days when agents trawled the neighborhood on horseback in search of telltale “For Sale” signs. We’re now in the era of the Multiple Listing Service, or “MLS,” which lets agents share information about properties on t... More...   $0 (03-10-2003 - CA)

[2] Microsoft manufactures, markets, and licenses computer software... More...   $0 (01-28-2003 - ND)

On a motion for summary judgment filed in this copyright infringement action, the district court held that the defendants' copying of a copyrighted manuscript for introduction into evidence in a state-court child-custody proceeding constituted a "fair use" of the manuscript under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 107, when the substance of the manuscript was relevant to the issues in the child-c... More...   $0 (01-24-2003 - MD)

In March 2000, the overwhelming majority of California voters passed Proposition 1A,1 which amended the California Constitution, giving the Governor the authority "to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature, for the operation of slot machines and for the conduct of lottery games and banking games by federally recognized Indian tribes on Indian lands in Calif... More...   $0 (12-27-2002 - CA)

Plaintiff-appellant PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo") appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, District Judge), entered September 25, 2000, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") on PepsiCo's claims that (1) Coca-Cola's enforcement of loyalty provisions in its distributorshi... More...   $0 (12-24-2002 - NY)

The defendant Village of Islandia (the "Vill... More...   $0 (12-13-2002 - NY)