| United States of America v. Minhaj Feroz Muhammad and Sufyan Feroze |
|
Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyers represent the Defendants charged with defrauding Medicare, Medicaid and private health care insurers and for participating in a money laundering conspiracy with the fraud proceeds. Minhaj Feroz Muhammad, 37, and Sufyan Feroze, 35, both of Naperville, owned and controlled, sometimes through straw owners, four clinical laboratories located in Illinoi $ (12-05-2025 - il) |
| United States of America v. Eliyahua "Eli" Weinstein |
|
Trenton, New Jersey criminal defendant lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud. A New Jersey man who was previously convicted twice of defrauding investors of more than $230 million was sentenced on November 14, 2025 to 37 years in prison for his role in a Ponzi-like fraud scheme that resulted in investor losses of more than $44 million, as well as other offenses, and his co-conspir $ (12-03-2025 - NJ) |
| United States of America v. Joaquín Guzmán López |
|
Chicago, Illinois, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to kidnapping, distributing drugs, and money laundering. Joaquin Guzman Lopez, who succeeded his father, Joaquin Guzman Loera, also known as “El Chapo,” as one of the leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico, pleaded guilty yesterday to federal drug charges. “The Sinaloa Cartel is a terrorist or $ (12-02-2025 - IL) |
| United States of America v. Hernan Burgos Prada |
|
Cincinnati, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956(h), which provides: |
| United States of America v. Daniel Ray Lane and Zhenyu Wang, a/k/a Bill Wang |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring and attempting to engage in and engaging in transactions regarding sanctioned Iranian oil, in violation of 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1707 (the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)) and 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for money laundering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). $0 (11-20-2025 - PA) |
| Amy Moore, et al. v. Howard Rubin |
|
Brooklyn, New York, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Racketeering (RICO) Act violation theories. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Darrell Lamont Mayfield |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a controlled drug in jail or penal institution in violation of 57 O.S. 21 (A). |
| United States of America v. Montressa Cunningham |
|
Topeka, Kansas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud and Wire Fraud and Money Laundering. |
| United States of America v. Macalla Lee Knott, also known as Kayla |
|
Fargo, North Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug and international money-laundering . |
| William Henry Jamerson v. City of Tulsa, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff was charged with first-degree rape in 1991. |
| United States of America v. Pierre Lemone Draper |
|
Dayton, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to commit theft and conversion of money and things of value from the United States; 18 U.S.C. § 1014 - Making false statements on a loan application; 18 U.S.C. § 1040 - Wire Fraud; 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - the knowing transfer, possession and use without lawful authority of a means of identification of anoth $0 (11-14-2025 - OH) |
| United States of America v. Daniel Kaplan and Adam Kaplan |
|
Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, investment advisor fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. |
| United States of America v. Bryan Douglas Conley |
|
Louisville, Kentucky, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transporting a minor for criminal sexual activity, kidnapping, bank fraud, identity theft, and interstate threats. |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Braun |
|
Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assaulting a nanny, swinging an IV pole at a nurse, dodging tolls in luxury cars, conspiracy to import drugs, drug possession, and money laundering. |
| United States of America v. Matthew Ramos-Soto |
|
Madison, Wisconsin, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, see 18 |
| United States of America v. Dartez Omar Faulk and Rosalind Carol Comfort |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Trafficking Young Woman . |
| United States of America v. Yana Leonova |
|
Washington DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with th conspiring to violate the Export Control Reform Act. |
| United States of America v. Alex Ahmed Kassem |
|
Houston, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted possession with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of |
| United States of America v. C.R. Kraus, a/k/a Christopher Kraus |
|
Newark, New Jersey, riminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with healthcare fraud, conspiracy to commit the same, and tax evasion. |
| United States of America v. Crandall Speights |
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stealing checks out of the mail. |
| Melissa Trinidad v. Ricahrd D'Ambra |
|
Providence, Rhode Island, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory. |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| State of Vermont v. Damien Diaz |
|
Bennington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and robbery. |
| Christopher B. Norman v. Tranam Systems International, Inc. and Masaru Brook Iwata |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a fraud theory. |
| United States of America v. Abdullah At Taqi, Khalilullah Yousuf, and Seema Rahman |
|
Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiring to Provide Material Support to ISIS. |
|
Next Page |