The Weitz Company v. MH Washington |
The Weitz Company, LLC, sued MH Washington, LLC, MacKenzie House, LLC, and Summit Steel Fabricators, Inc., for breach of contract. The jury returned verdicts for Weitz against MH Washington/MacKenzie House (for $981,976) and against Summit Steel (for $326,839). The jury also found for MH Washington/MacKenzie House on its breach-of-contract counterclaim against Weitz (for $285,400.07). The district... More... $0 (01-07-2011 - MO) |
Charles J. Farley v. Country Coach Incorporated |
In this diversity action, Defendant-Appellant Country Coach, Inc. appeals a $191,784 jury verdict for Plaintiff-Appellee Charles Farley on a claim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability on Farley’s 2004 Country Coach Magna motor home. In particular, Country Coach alleges that the district court erred by reversing its grant of summary judgment on Farley’s implied-warranty claim, ... More... $0 (12-15-2010 - MI) |
James Brooks v. Howard R. Arthur, Sr. |
In 2008, plaintiffs James Brooks, Donald Hamlette, and Samuel St. John, who were correctional officers for Virginia’s Department of Corrections (the "Department"), initiated these since-consolidated civil actions in the Western District of Virginia, asserting retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. |
Michael Dewayne Smith v. State of Oklahoma |
¶1 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Michael Dewayne Smith's second application for post-conviction relief, motion for discovery, and motion for evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Smith in 2003 in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. CF-2002-1329, of the first degree murders of Janet Moore and Sarath Pulluru. The jury assessed a sentence of death for each murder.1 Since ... More... $0 (11-05-2010 - OK) |
Stephen Gregory v. Kenneth Pulasky |
Plaintiff, a residential landlord, sued defendant, his tenant, for rent due and other expenses resulting from defendant's premature vacation of the premises. Defendant did not respond to the action and default was entered. After a proof hearing, the court entered judgment in plaintiff's favor for $10,514.86, plus costs and interest. The court did not allow additional expenses claimed by plaintiff... More... $0 (10-01-2010 - NJ) |
Melissa Lee v. Carter-Reed Company, L.L.C. |
A class-action lawsuit can give a large number of consumers with small claims the power to act collectively in seeking redress against a corporate entity. In this appeal, we must decide whether denying thousands of individuals the opportunity to proceed as a class in a consumer-fraud action was an abuse of discretion. |
Virgil Shelton v. Kennedy Funding |
This appeal arises out of the sale of an Arkansas cemetery. A jury awarded the cemetery’s seller, Virgil Shelton, $1,675,000 on his breach-of-contract and fraud claims against Kennedy Funding, Inc. (KFI). KFI appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for reduction of Shelton’s judgment to $675,000. |
Ralph Leroy Menzies v. State of Utah |
¶1 Nearly twenty-six years ago, a jury convicted Ralph Leroy Menzies of the first degree murder of Maurine Hunsaker. At sentencing, Judge Raymond Uno imposed the death penalty. Since then, we have issued three opinions in Mr. Menzies‘s case: |
State ex rel Oklahoma Bar Association v. Gloyd Lynn McCoy |
¶1 In what was initially a Rule 6 but later converted to a Rule 10,1 Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5. O.S. 2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A proceeding, the complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, charged the respondent, Gloyd Lynn McCoy (McCoy/attorney), with thirteen counts of professional misconduct ranging from failure to communicate to misuse of client funds and notice of suspension by the U... More... $0 (09-21-2010 - OK) |
Tom Watkins v. Henry Day Ford |
¶1 Plaintiff Tom Watkins appeals the judgment of the trial court resolving his contractual dispute with Defendant Henry Day Ford (Henry Day). Watkins argues that the trial court erred in several respects in its decision. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. |
Lucille Nappo v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation |
The plaintiff, Lucille J. Nappo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding the validity of a mortgage on her residential property in Avon held by the defendant, Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation. |
James Howard v. American National Fire Insurance Company |
James Howard, a young man molested as a child by a Catholic priest, sued the Bishop who retained the priest in the diocese. A jury found the Bishop liable for negligent retention, and the court entered judgment in the amount of $5.5 million: $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages. The Bishop settled with Howard while the case was on appeal, and agreed to join Howar... More... $0 (08-19-2010 - CA) |
Karen Robinson v. McNeil Consumer Healthcare |
Karen Robinson and her husband (suing for loss of consortium) brought a products liability suit against McNeil Consumer Healthcare in an Illinois state court. The case was removed to a federal district court in Illinois under the diversity jurisdiction. McNeil’s parent, Johnson & Johnson, was a defendant in the district court, but the jury found in its favor and the appellants do not challenge t... More... $0 (08-12-2010 - IL) |
Blair Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc. |
This is an appeal from a trial court's order awarding damages under claims for breach of contract and violation of the Payment of Wages Act. Appellant Brown & Brown of South Carolina (Appellant) contends the trial court erred (1) in finding it breached its contract with Respondent Blair Mathis (Mathis); (2) in finding it violated the Payment of Wages Act; (3) in applying the Payment of Wages Act... More... $0 (08-09-2010 - SC) |
State of New Mexico v. Cleo Juan |
{1} Cleo Juan (Defendant) directly appeals her conviction for child abuse resulting in the death of a child under twelve years of age contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-6-1(D) (1973, prior to 2009 amendment), alleging that the trial court erred by (1) failing to provide an answer to the jury’s question regarding the option of “hanging,” (2) denying Defendant’s request for a lesser included ... More... $0 (08-09-2010 - NM) |
Blair Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc. |
This is an appeal from a trial court's order awarding damages under claims for breach of contract and violation of the Payment of Wages Act. Appellant Brown & Brown of South Carolina (Appellant) contends the trial court erred (1) in finding it breached its contract with Respondent Blair Mathis (Mathis); (2) in finding it violated the Payment of Wages Act; (3) in applying the Payment of Wages Act ... More... $0 (08-09-2010 - SC) |
In the Matter of Intel Corporation, a corporation. |
The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) having heretofore issued its complaint charging the Respondent Intel Corporation with violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and the Respondent having been served with a copy of that complaint, together with a notice of contemplated relief and having filed its answer denying said charges; and |
Camille Gburek v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P. |
Litton Loan Servicing (“Litton”) serviced a mortgage on a home owned by Camille Gburek. When Gburek fell behind on her mortgage payments, Litton sent her a letter offering to discuss ways she could avoid losing her home in foreclosure and asking for her current financial information. A few days later, Gburek received a letter from Titanium Solutions (“Titanium”) on behalf of Litton; this l... More... $0 (07-27-2010 - IL) |
Michael D. Sloas v. CSX Transportation |
Michael Sloas, a sheetmetal worker employed by CSX Transportation, Inc. ("CSXT"), injured his back while attempting to remove a damaged Snyder valve from a locomotive’s fuel tank. Subsequently, Sloas applied for and received a disability annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act ("RRA"). See 45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq. Sloas also sued CSXT for negligence under the Federal Employers Liability Act ("... More... $0 (07-26-2010 - WV) |
United States of America v. Hassan Nemazee |
|
Gary Tibbetts v. Dairyland Insurance Co. |
[¶1] Gary Tibbetts appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Murphy, J.) following a jury trial that awarded him damages for injuries stemming from a motor vehicle collision. The issues we address on appeal involve the payment of underinsured motorist insurance. Dairyland Insurance Co. cross-appeals in part because it contests the allocation of payment among the und... More... $0 (07-15-2010 - ME) |
James Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc. |
When a group of companies conspires to fix prices at higher than a competitive level, the resulting overcharge is paid in the first instance by the direct purchaser of the cartel‟s goods. In markets where the direct purchaser is not also the ultimate purchaser, but an intermediary between the cartel and the consumer (the indirect purchaser), several questions arise: First, who should be permitte... More... $0 (07-12-2010 - CA) |
State of Oklahoma v. Alfred Brian Mitchell |
¶1 Alfred Brian Mitchell, Appellant, was tried by a jury in June 1992 and convicted of First-Degree Malice Aforethought Murder, in violation of 21 O.S. 1991, § 701.7; Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, § 801; Larceny of an Automobile, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, § 1720; First-Degree Rape, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, §§ 1111, 1114; and Forcible Anal Sodomy, in... More... $0 (07-01-2010 - OK) |
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone of Nevada v. United States Department of the Interior, et al. |
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone of Nevada, a federally-recognized Indian tribe (“the Tribe”), the Western Shoshone Defense Project (“WSDP”),1 and Great Basin Mine Watch (“GBMW”)2 (collectively,“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment, and the grant of summary judgment to the Department of the Interior (“DOI”), the Bureau of Land ... More... $0 (06-18-2010 - NV) |
Hannah Leigh Evans v. Billy Bradley Evans, II |
In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred when it sustained the demurrer of Billy Bradley Evans, II (“Evans”) to the amended complaint of Hannah Leigh Evans (“Hannah”).1 |
Next Page |