In thirteen issues, Christine E. Reule argues the trial court erred by granting Colony Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment disposing of all of Reule’s claims. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In 1999, Reule purchased a unit in the Sherwood Valley I condominiums. All unit owners were members of the Sherwood Valley I Council of Co-Owners

2

(“SVI�). As

Appellant Dresser-Rand Company challenges the trial court’s orders denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Scott M. Bolick. We reverse the summary judgment granted in favor of Bolick and render judgment in favor of Dresser-Rand.

2

BACKGROUND

Bolick was originally hired by Dresser-Rand in 2006. He worked out of Albany, New Yo

ECO Properties, LLC sued Ford Motor Company and Joe Cooper Ford of Midwest City, LLC on breach of contract theories claiming:

1. Plaintiff, Eco Properties, LLC. (“Eco�), is an Oklahoma limited liability company with its principal place of business located in Oklahoma County.

2. Defendant, Ford Motor Company (‘Ford�) is a foreign corporation registered to do business withi

MCS Construction sued Associated Fabricators and Constructors, Inc., David W. Brunson and Greg Schrimser claiming:

1. MCS and AFC entered into a Subcontract agreement (the “Ft. Hood Agreementâ€�) on or about September 17, 2010, under which AFC agreed to provide materials and perform services necessaryto construct, install, test and warrant various mechanical systems (the “Ft. Hood Workâ

Steve Beck and Rhonda Beck sued Oak Tree Partners, LLC, Dunhill Develop0ment and Jeffrey O. Bolding on breach of contract theories claiming:

1. The events and occurrence which give rise to Plaintiffs’ causes of action occurred in and relate to real property located within Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Accordingly, venue is proper in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.

ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO

Appellants were property owners whose homes were damaged by Hurricane Ike. They brought suit alleging the same state and federal statutory, constitutional, and common law causes of action against multiple governmental entities, officials and others. One of the governmental entities was Jefferson County. In August 2011, the trial court granted the County’s motion for traditional and no-evidence s

In two issues, appellants, whom we have listed above, appeal the final judgment that the trial court rendered in favor of appellees Delta Steel, Inc. (Delta Steel) and its parent company, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (Reliance). Appellants contend that the trial court erred by denying their motions for summary judgment, granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment, and making allegedly inco

In this personal-injury case, the trial court granted summary judgment on the defendants’ affirmative defense of limitations. We affirm as to Humble Family

2

Skate Center Inc. and reverse and remand as to Gloria Tate d/b/a Humble Family Skate Center.

BACKGROUND

On November 22, 2011, plaintiff/appellant Eddie Medina, Jr. sued defendants/appellees Gloria Tate d/

This lawsuit arises out of a home remodeling project. Silver Oak Custom Homes, LLC (“Silver Oak�) appeals the trial court summary judgment in favor of Brent and Jena Tredway. When the project went awry, Silver Oak sued the Tredways under multiple liability theories. Silver Oak contends that it presented evidence that creates a fact issue regarding each of its claims and the Tredways’

A fire destroyed a rental property owned by Douglas and Kathy Rasmussen. The Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Company denied the Rasmussens’ property insurance claim because the Rasmussens had failed to pay the insurance premium due for the renewal of that policy six months before the fire occurred. The

2

Rasmussens sued Texas Farm Bureau and Fred Bolton, a Texas Farm Bureau agent,

This lawsuit involves the purported purchase of residential real estate by appellants Matthew and J.W. Jenkins, who are cousins and business partners. The trial court granted summary judgment against appellants and in favor of appellees Stewart Title Company (“Stewart Title�) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase�). Appellants moved to reconsider both summary judgments; the trial court ove

Bryan Smith sued Marie S. Route 66 Motor Co. on a fraud theory theory claiming:

1. That on or about May 15, 2012, in Tulsa County, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Plaintiff bought a 2003 Range Rover from the Defendant, Marie’s Route 66 Motor Co.

2. That on or about May 19, 2012, Plaintiff’s vehicle began to experience problems, wherein the functional parts of the dash would not work. Specif

Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. was an originator and purchaser of home loans and one of the many casualties of the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Cut off from its usual sources of financing, Thornburg attempted to raise new capital through a series of stock offerings in 2007 and early 2008. But as the mortgage market continued to sour, Thornburg’s problems mounted and the value of its stock declined. Inv

Scott Boling sued Shadow sued Mountain Behavioral Health System, LLC, UHS of Delaware, Inc., University Health Services, Inc.and Liliana Cardona on negligence theories claiming:

1. Plaintiffs are residents of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.

2. Defendant Liliana Cardona is a resident of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.

3. Defendant Shadow Mountain is a foreign li

Mathew E. Warlick, DDS sued James L. West, DDS breach of contract, tortious interference and misappropriation of trade secrets seeking injunctive and compensatory damages claiming:

1. Plaintiff Matthew E. Warlick, D.D.S. (hereinafter “Plaintiff� or “Dr. Warlick�) is an individual and resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

2. Dr. Warlick is licensed and certified by the State

Wilmington Trust Company and Jay L'Archevesque, co-trustees of the Paul E. L'Archevesque Special Revocable Trust-2006, challenge the district court's grant of summary judgment to Pruco Life Insurance Company on Pruco's claim for a judgment of mutual rescission of a life insurance policy, owned by the trust, on the life of Paul L'Archevesque.

This case turns on a limited set of mat

Plaintiff Angela Guarino appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims against the brand-name manufacturers of the prescription drug Reglan, Wyeth LLC and Schwarz Pharma, Inc. (collectively, the “Brand Manufacturers�), and grant of summary judgment in favor of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva), the manufacturer of its generic equivalent (metoclopramide), on her claims of negligenc

This defamation action arises out of a contentious custody dispute that has made its way to this court five times.1 In the underlying case, Jayraj Nair persistently fought court-ordered efforts to reunify his former wife, Bindu, with their older son, Suraj. (We

__________________________

1 See Nair v. Superior Court (May 28, 2009, C061761) [summary denial of petition for writ of

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered April 26, 2012, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff project owner alleges that defendants fraudulently misrepresented that their construction management company (PMG) had obtained full subguard insurance coverage to protect plainti

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered August 11, 2011, as amended by order entered May 16, 2012, which granted defendants-respondents' (collectively, the owners) motion to dismiss the complaint as against them and denied plaintiff's cross motion for leave to depose nonparty James Reilly, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, the cross motion gra

Appellant Texas Echo Land and Cattle, LLP appeals the trial court‘s order granting Appellee General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC d/b/a General Steel Corporation‘s motion to compel arbitration.2 We will affirm.

______________________

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2Because, as we explain later, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) governs the arbitration agreement at issue in this ca

Plaintiff suffered injuries, allegedly as a result of ingesting a brand-name drug and its generic equivalents. She sued the manufacturers of both the brand-name drug and its generic equivalents. Although plaintiff asserts 11 separate causes of action, the gist of her claims against all defendants is the same—they failed to produce a safe product, failed to adequately warn plaintiff of the safety

Appellant S.H. appeals from the district court’s termination of her parental rights to her three children. She contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the court’s finding that she voluntarily executed an affidavit of relinquishment and that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the finding that termination was in the children’s best interest. We will affirm.

Appellant Will Williams appeals the trial court’s order granting the traditional and no-evidence motion for summary judgment filed by appellee America First Lloyds Insurance. We affirm.

_________________________

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

Background Facts

In April 2012, appellant filed his original petition in the trial court against appellee to appeal from a

Jeremy Perkins and Alisa Perkins sued CR Forma Corporation on breach of contract theories claiming:

1. The Perkins, a married couple, are and at all pertinent times were, residents of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

2. CR Forma is a corporation created and existing under the laws of the state of Oklahoma, with its principal place of business in Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

3. This Court ha