Age Discrimination - 29 U.S.C. 621; The Court previously dismissed the plaintiff's claims for violations of ERISA and negligent misrepresentation on summary judgment. Pearl Pedde, a former night auditor who was 68 years old at the time of her discharge, contended that Motel 6 terminated her employment because of her age. Motel 6 offered evidence that her manager discharged her because she

Fishing vessel owner sued seafood processor for breach of contract and intentional misrepresentation, alleging lost profits because delay in opening of processor's plant rendered processor unable to accept vessel owner's catches.

Fishing vessel owner sued seafood processor for breach of contract and intentional misrepresentation, alleging lost profits because delay in opening of processor's plant rendered processor unable to accept vessel owner's catches.

Negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty claims against real estate broker. Plaintiffs alleged that Century 21 breached its statutory duty by failing to conduct a reasonably competent and diligent visual inspection on their behalf as required by Civil Code section 2079, and also had falsely represented the physical condition of the residence purchased by plaintiffs.

Jo Landstom is a minority shareholder in Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Company (BHJMC). She brought suit against the remaining shareholders in BHJMC: Milt Shaver, Jack Devereaux, and Constance Drew. The case proceeded to trial on her equitable claim of shareholder oppression and legal claims of breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with prospective economic advatages, negligent mis

Negligent Misrepresentation/Consumer Fraud - In the Fall of 1993, Plaintiffs telephoned Defendant regarding buying a house in Vermont. Plaintiffs lived in California. Defendant informed buyers that the house they were interested in had a dog smell. Plaintiffs negotiated a contract over the phone and placed a $17,000.00 deposit on the house. After visiting the house and smelling the strong dog

Fraud - Plaintiff sought to obtain financing for the purchase of a house. Due to the alleged misrepresentation of those parties who secured the financing, the plaintiff's unintentionally borrowed more money than they intended to borrow and at a higher interest rate.

Legal malpractice, breach of contract, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes sec. 42-110a, et seq. - Plaintiff, a startup company, brought suit against defendants claiming that as a direct result of legal servic

Breach of contract, negligence, grossly negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the Deceptive Trade Practice Act claims by school district against contractor hired to supervise the building of an elementary school building. This suit arose out of an elementary school construction project overseen by D.S.A., Inc., a construction management firm, for the he Hillsboro Independent School Dist

Fraud, conspiracy to defraud and negligent misrepresentation claims leading to collapse of insurance company.

Malicious prosecution, wrongful discharge and negligent misrepresentation claimes by former Shoney's employee who was terminated and whose application for unemployment benefits was opposed by defendant.

Federal trademark infringement, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of contract, unjust enrichment claims, and defamation/disparagement claims asserted by Plaintiff Neogen Corporation. Plaintiff Neogen Corporation claimed trademark rights to the trademark "Gold Nugget" for its line of quality, over-the-counter equine care products. Defendant Arthur J. Trickey counter-claimed, asserting a

Fraud claim by former employee of defendant who claimed that defendant committed fraud to induce his to accept its offer of employment. He alleged that defendant make knowingly false representations regarding its disposition and ability to fund long-range product development. He asserted that he would not have accepted employment with defendnat if he had know its true financial condition. The c

Negligent misrepresentation, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, equitable fraud, constructive fraud, and fraudulent concealment relating to a residential property sold to plaintiff by defendants in March, 1995. After purchasing the house, plaintiff learned that water flowed under the house when it rained and that moisture in the crawl space had rotted the floor joists. Evidenc offere

Misrepresentation (fraud), suppression and deceit claims by purchaser of new automobile. Plaintiff claimed that defendant and its sales force de-horsed (got her car away from her) and then took advantage of her. Plaintiff went to defendant's automobile dealership on March 3, 1995 to shop for a new car. Initially, she was interested in a Sunbird and negotiated with a saleman for the purchase of

Deceptive and unfair trade practice claim by plaintiff consumer with counterclaim un the Federal Odometer Act by defendant car dealership relating to odometer milage representation by plaintiff on trade in vehicle. Plaintiff wanted to purchase a used 1991 BMW 850, a limited production vehicle, which defendant had for sale. Plaintiff inspected and test drove the vehicle. Plaintiff claimed that

Misrepresentation, suppression and wantoness claims by the owner of General Motors dealership. Charles Bell Motor Company became an authorized GM dealer in 1979. The dealership's primary geographic area of responsibility consisted of the City of Tuskegee and certain other communities in Macon County and several surrounding counties. GMAC financed the dealership's purchases of vehicles from GM (

Breach of contact, mechanic's lien and quantum meruit claims relating to kitchen remodeling job with counterclaim for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation. In June 1995, defendants entered into a written contract for a kitchen remodeling and addition project. The contract price, including subsequent change orders, was $27,271.43. Pursuant to the contract, defendant paid the firt t

Breach of implied covenants in certain oil and gas leases, violation of statutory duties regarding the method and timing of paying royalties, misrepresentation and/or failure to disclose materal facts to royalty owners concerning gas purchase contracts between Southwestern Engery Company, SEECO, Inc. and Arkansas Western Gas Company. Plaintiffs also claimed that defendants failed to fulfill other

The first National Bank of Durant sued Honey Creek Entertainment Corporation the owner of Arbuckle Wilderness Park, to collect on a promissory note for 2.8 million dollars, and sued Acme Finance Corporation, a Corporation owned solely by Lena Clancy, to foreclose 3,000 acres on a surety mortage. Honey Creek Entertainment Corporation went into Chapter 11 backruptcy and remains in Chapter 11 b

Breach of Contract, federal odometer violation, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, and consumer fraud.

Fraud and misrepresentation claims by shareholder of J & J Landfill, Inc. based upon defendant's dissolution of J & J Landfill, Inc. after McDaniel had none site work on Jerry Ann Elliott's property needed to operate a landfill on the property. Plaintiff claimed that the Elliotts planned to reopen the landfill without him as a participant.

Fraud, intentional misrepresentation and deceit/negligent misrepresentation relating the purchase by Plaintiff of a bank-owned retirement hotel from Chino Valley Bank in March 1992 for a total consideration of $6,270,000. Plaintiff claimed that Defendant failed to disclose that the property, which Defendant had previously financed in the construction and development phases in 1988, did not own it

Plaintiffs unknowingly purchased a terminte infested and wood-rot infested house. Plaintiffs sued the broker, the exterminator and the seller claiming misrepresentation, fraud and professional negligence against the broker, and negligence, breach of warrant and breach of contract against the exterminator. The home had a detached garage/cottage and much of the damage was centered on the det

Claim against State of New York for negligent misrepresentation wherein state agency provided erroneous environmental emissions data to plaintiff power plant developer, plaintiff relied on the accuracy of that data in apply for necessary permist to construct coal-fired power plant, and to meet on-line deadline in long-term power purchase contract with utility. Consequently, plaintiff failed to ob