Plaintiff Allied Sound (“Allied”) obtained a judgment against Kingdom Resort, Inc. (“KRI”) in the amount of $725,000.00 for breach of contract. Allied could not collect this judgment because KRI later declared bankruptcy. Then Allied filed this suit against Eddie Neely and Jess Davis, who were the owners of KRI, alleging misrepresentation, concealment and fraud.

In 19

Children's Broadcasting Corporation appeals from an order of the district court that set aside a jury verdict for Children's on its claims for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets against ABC Radio Networks, Inc. and The Walt Disney Company. The court concluded that Children's had not presented sufficient evidence of causation and damages. In addition to granting judgment a

This appeal arises from a products liability case involving silicone gel breast implants. In March 1983, Mary Grenier received breast implants manufactured by Medical Engineering Corporation ("MEC"). Eleven years later, Grenier sued MEC after learning that silicone gel had leaked or "bled" through the implant shell. The district court granted summary judgment for MEC. Grenier v. Medical Engineerin

Plaintiffs Tom and Marie Whatley obtained a $265,000 judgment on a jury verdict in their favor against defendant Crawford & Company. The award was made on claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation, and fraudulent concealment in connection with Tom Whatley's employment by Crawford. Crawford appeals, claiming that a number of prejudicial errors so infected the trial as to

The Procter & Gamble Company ("P&G") appeals the dismissal of its lawsuit against Amway Corporation and other defendants for defamation, fraud, and violations of the Lanham Act, RICO, and Texas state law.

P&G, a manufacturer and distributor of numerous household products, has been plagued by rumors of links to Satanism since the late 1970's or early 1980's. The most common variant of the rumo

1 Linda and Terry Threlkeld (the Threlkelds) appeal from the order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, dismissing their complaint against the State of Colorado, Colorado State University, Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (collectively, CSU) for lack of personal jurisd

In this appeal, the primary issue is whether US WATS improperly denied Mark Scully the right to exercise his stock option following his wrongful termination, and, if so, whether the District Court, in awarding damages, improperly failed to apply a discount from market value to account for the option shares' lack of marketability. In May 1995, US WATS, Inc., a Pennsylvania based telecommunic

¶1 This appeal arises from a well-publicized decision by the Oklahoma City Police Department (OCPD) to remove the Academy Award-winning film The Tin Drum from public access after a state judge opined in an ex parte hearing that the movie contained child pornography in violation of Oklahoma law. Michael Camfield, whose rented copy of the movie was obtained from him at his apartment by three OCPD o

Do state law claims against a health maintenance organization (HMO), arising out of its refusal to provide services under a Medicare-subsidized health plan, fall within the exclusive review provisions of the Medicare Act requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies? (42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq.) Some disagreement exists among state and federal courts on this question, which has not yet been addr

Breach of Contract, Violation of Texas Insurance Code, and Misrepresentation of Insurance Policy Coverage Claims - Twenty-nine year old Paul Hastings was working for a subcontractor on a road construction project on Highway 287 in Wise County, Texas when an accident rendered him a quadriplegic. He was working for Scott Derr Painting Company, a subcontractor hired to paint an overpass bridge. H

Breach of Contract; Promissory Estoppel; Unjust Enrichment; Fraudulent and Negligent Misrepresentation

Due Process, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Defamation and Misrepresentation Claims

Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Fraudulent Inducement and Negligent Misrepresentation.

Plaintiff’s Prayer: Plaintiff Nelco Technology, Inc. requested damages of not less than $56.8 million on its claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresen

The parties in this case are Ticketmaster Ticketing Company, Inc., which merged into Ticketmaster, LLC., and N2K Inc. There was a trial of over 6 weeks. Ticketmaster was represented by three of the largest law firms in the United States; Katten, Muchin, Zavis (460 attorneys nationally), Kaye, Scholer, Feirman & Handler (approximately 400 nationally) and Quinn Emanuel (approximately 100 attorneys

Plaintiff bought suit against Hartford Insurance Company for negligent misrepresentation of coverage benefits under a property and casualty policy. Defendant had provided Plaintiffs with a marketing brochure describing the various coverage features that Hartford's "enhanced special property" policy provided. The policy did not provide some of the coverage features which gave rise to the lawsuit.

Gary Kremen registered the domain name http://www.sex.com with Network Solutions, Inc. on May 9, 1994. Online Classified, Inc. was the registering organization. Plaintiff never constructed a web site or otherwise commercially exploited the domain name. In a letter dated October 15, 1995, Sharon Dimmick, purportedly on behalf of Online Classified, informed Stephen Cohen that Online Classified had

Products Liability - Plaintiff and her husband alleged causes of action for strict liability, negligence, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranties, breach of warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, breach of UCC, misrepresentation, fraud by concealment, false advertising, negligence per se, res ipsa loquitur, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent supervision,

This case involved DTPA violations, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud regarding an attorney/client relationship.

Breach of contract and unjust enrichment case. Counterclaims of DTPA, breach of warranty,fraud, and negligent misrepresentation.

Breach of contract. Former tenant sued former landlord claiming breach of contract in misrepresentation of the size of the lease space.

Breach of fire insurance duty to defend. Gosnell sued California Pre-Stain over allegedly defective shingles sold to Gosnell. California Pre-Stain then filed a separate cross complaint against Fire Research claiming negligence and misrepresentation relating to research and recommendations made by it relating to the application of fire retardant to the shingles. American National refused to defe

Products Liability - Fraudulent misrepresentation of information about Pondimin "fen-phen" to the public and plaintiffs.

American Home Products denied that plaintiffs had been injured or that it acted wrongfully in the marking and distribution of the drug.

Trusts - Royalties - Oil and Gas - Mangan and Savage contend that Mangan and Savage, as beneficiaries of the Catherine Jone Living Trust, hereinafter called the "Trust", received a royalty interest in the Classen Edwards Well No. 17, hereinafter called the "Well". The Well was operated by combined Resources Corporation, hereinafter called "Combined". the issues against Combined have been resolved

SRC suit for declaratory judgment and intentional interference with contractual relations. Arnold counterclaimed for Fraud, Misrepresentation, Breach of fiduciary duty and Interference with prospective economic gain, all arising out of the sale of all stock of Tulsa Equipment Manufacturing in 1997.

Misrepresentation - Constructive Fraud - Unjust Enrichment - Violation of Insurance Law - Evidence showed that misrepresentations and omissions by defendant had induced plaintiff to pay exorbitant premiums for its group health coverage for policy years 1991 and 1992.