Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG) contracted with Levy Premium Foods to manage the food and beverage services at several entertainment venues located in southern California. Levy contracted with Canvas Corporation to provide laborers who sold food and beverages at AEG venues. In 2013, several vendors filed a wage and hour class action against AEG, Levy and Canvas for failure to pay minimum wage a

In this workers’ compensation appeal, we are asked to revisit our rule governing apportionment resulting from successive work injuries at multiple places of employment in light of the 2004 amendments to the workers’ compensation permanent disabilities statute. The deputy workers’ compensation commissioner awarded benefits to the worker based on a finding of two successive inju

Appellant father (“Father”) and appellant mother (“Mother”) separately appeal the trial court’s order terminating their parental rights to their five children. On appeal, neither parent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings relating to the statutory grounds for termination. Rather, both contend the evidence is legally

BATON ROUGE, LA - Ruby C. Dunn, age 63, of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, who pled guilty before U.S. District Judge Shelly D. Dick to theft of government property, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, and admitted to forfeiture allegations contained in the Bill of Information.

According to the factual basis presented to the Court in connection with her plea, DUNN began rec

In Hahn v. Diaz-Barba (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1177 (Hahn I), this court affirmed an order, issued under the forum non conveniens doctrine, staying an action against residents of California for tortious interference with contract and related claims for the sale of an interest in a Mexican business. We determined that petitioners (hereafter defendants) met their burden of proving Mexico was a suitabl

Terrence Lee Yohner filed this action in an attempt to prevent the California Department of Justice (the Department) from listing his name and information concerning a sexual offense that he committed, on its Megan's Law Internet Web site.1 Yohner suffered a conviction for committing a lewd act on his stepgranddaughter in violation of Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a).2 Section 290.46 mandat

Andrew L. (Andrew) is the biological father of Emilio G. who was born in July 2013. Katherine O. (Katherine) is Emilio’s biological mother. Andrew and Katherine never married. Katherine became pregnant with Emilio a few months after she and Andrew began dating in August 2012. Their relationship was not smooth. By April 2013, Andrew and Katherine had broken up, with Andrew confirming the bre

Appellant (the Father) appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to G.R. and T.R.1 The Father raises four issues on appeal. In his first three issues, he challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding that he violated subsections (D), (E), and (O) of section 161.001(1) of the Family Code. In his fourth issue, he

Tulsa, OK - In re the Marriage of: CADG and LDG, Jr.

Issues

For cases filed before 1/1/2000, ancillary issues may not appear except in the docket.

Issue # 1. Issue: DIVORCE WITH MINOR CHILDREN (DIVMC)
Filed By: CADG
Filed Date: 01/02/2014
Party Name Disposition Information
Respondent: LDG Disposed: DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 10/02/2014. Other

Tulsa, OK - In the Marriage of Robles-Soto, Miguel Manuel and Jessica Marie Parker

Docket
Date Code Description Count Party Amount
01-02-2014 TEXT

Family and Domestic Initial Filing.
1
01-02-2014 DIVWOMC

DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN

01-02-2014 DMFE

DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
$ 2.00
01-02-2014 PFE1

Bonnie Jean Platt (“appellant”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Minor J. Platt (“appellee”) cross-appeals the same judgment. The main issue at trial concerned whether non-marital property owned by appellee should be included in the equitable distribution of marital assets due to appellant’s contributions to the property dur

Appellant Victoria Jacobs appeals an entry of judgment against her in a civil theft action brought by Appellee Atlantic Coast Refining (“ACR”), a corporation held solely by her former boyfriend, Anthony Arbanas. Among other issues, Appellant argues the trial court erred by admitting evidence of a prior, unrelated motion and settlement agreement. For the reasons set forth below, we agre

We affirm the trial court’s corrected order granting the motion of the
appellee, Vanessa Marchandise (“the Wife”), to approve a parenting plan, and
write only to clarify the temporary nature of both the order and the agreement upon
which it is based.
In August 2013, appellant, Christian Jamin (“the Husband”), and the Wife,
through a series of e-ma

Bashar Ahmedo appeals from an order requiring him to pay attorney fees incurred by Sina Faton to obtain a domestic violence restraining order against him. He asserts the fee award was improper because the fees were not requested in a timely or proper manner and they were unsupported by the evidence. We reject these contentions and affirm.
2
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
As we shall

Plaintiff William J. Burford
agreed to market and facilitate the purchase and sale of accounting
practices on behalf of defendant Accounting Practice
Sales, Inc. (APS) in various territories from Kentucky to
Louisiana. The parties initially signed one written contract
assigning Louisiana to Burford. They later modified this
agreement by orally agreeing that Burford should a

Oklahoma City, OK - Lanell Long sued Aubrey Clark Long, Jr. on a tortious interference contract theory claiming:

I.
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff is an individual who resides in Oklahoma County, Oklaho am.
2. Defendant is an individual who resides in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.
3. The events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in Oklahoma Count, Oklahoma.
II.
JURISDICTION

Daniel Phillips appeals the district court's enforcement of child-support orders against him based on a claim that the orders arose out of Washington state and that the claims should no longer be collectible under a 10-year Washington limitation period. But the applicable statute in both Kansas and Washington provides that in an interstate proceeding for arrearages—or overdue payments�

¶1 Ellen Brown (Appellee) and Jimmy Allen Brown (Appellant) were divorced on November 30, 1987. Appellee was awarded custody of the minor child born of the marriage. Shortly thereafter, in January 1988, they filed a joint application to modify which was granted. Appellant was awarded custody of the child, and Appellee was awarded visitation rights. She was ordered to pay $88.00 a month in child

This appeal arises from an alleged breach of a provision in an agreed decree of divorce obligating the parties to share equally in the cost of their daughter’s college expenses. Appellant Richard Abrams argues the trial court erred in ruling that (1) the four-year statute of limitations did not apply and (2) he breached his contractual obligation to pay his portion of his daughter’s

¶1 Appellant Jim Weibert (Jim) appeals from an order of the Eleventh Judicial
District, Flathead County, awarding Crissy Tieman (Crissy) custody of their daughter and
attorney’s fees.
¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it ordered Jim to
pay Crissy’s attorney’s fees.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶3 Jim and

¶1 Matthew Sampley appeals from an order of the Montana Thirteenth Judicial
District Court, Yellowstone County, dismissing for lack of jurisdiction the parenting and
custody issues Matthew presented in his petition for dissolution of marriage. We affirm.
ISSUES
¶2 We review the following issues:
1. Did the District Court err by refusing to hold a hearing prior to issuing

SACRAMENTO, CA — Sippy Lal, 62, of Sacramento, was sentenced to two years in prison for conspiring to induce aliens to illegally enter the United States for private financial gain, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.

According to court documents, from at least October 24, 2006, until January 10, 2012, Lal and co-defendants Mamta Sharma, 37, and Rani Singh-Lal, 30,

At issue in this dissolution of a 27-year marriage are issues of division of
community property and spousal support. Appellant ex-wife questions the court’s
valuation of the couple’s two grocery stores because (1) it purportedly used the wrong
valuation date, (2) it relied on an expert who used the “marital value” of the properties
rather than the “i

These consolidated appeals concern the calculation of retirement benefits under the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Government Code section 20000 et seq.1 The plaintiffs are former police officers and firefighters employed by local public agencies that provide employee retirement benefits through the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). In order to enhan

¶1 The dispositive question raised for our review is whether a party must file a motion for default and give the adverse party notice under Rule 10 of the Rules for District Courts, 12 O.S.2011, ch. 2, app. (Rule 10), when the adverse party fails to file an answer or an entry of appearance but physically appears at a hearing. We answer in the affirmative.

I. FACTS AND ALLEGATIONS
<