The trial court found appellant Tommy Nguyen liable for violating the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA�) in the course of selling a restaurant to appellee Taiwai Luk. The trial court further found appellant David Vuong, who drafted the bill of sale for Nguyen and Luk, liable for legal malpractice. The trial court entered judgment against Nguyen and Vuong, jointly and severally, for $62,600

¶ 1 We decide here if the trial judge erred in awarding $375,000.00 in attorney fees to plaintiffs/appellees in their class action suit brought against defendant/appellant, Sight `n Sound Appliance Centers, Inc., d/b/a Sight `n Sound & Cost Warehouse under the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act (OCPA), 15 O.S.1991, § 751 et seq., as amended.1 We hold the trial judge erred, and the Court of Civil

¶ 1 Lyle Wall, as trustee of the Sugar Shack Land Trust, Elaine Comfort-Waldher, and Kevin Waldher (collectively, "the Waldhers") appeal from the final judgment entered by the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, in favor of Harry Blazer. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

I. The Properties

¶ 2 The properties at issue in this case are locat

¶1 The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, sued the defendants' to have a certain deed, absolute in form, executed and delivered by them to one Geo. J. Hetzel, together with a contract of defeasance, executed at the same time, to secure a debt of $ 1,800 declared a mortgage, and that they be permitted to redeem against the defendant James M. Potts, the grantee of Eva M. Hetzel (the grantee of sai

¶1 Don Brown (Seller) owned land on which First Mustang State Bank (First Mustang) held a mortgage and note for $35,000.00. On August 12, 1985, Brown entered into a contract for the sale of this particular property with the partners of Geronimo Properties (Buyer). The sale price was $135,000.00. It is this realty, which we will call "Property A," that is the subject of the present appeal.

¶1 It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that the petition, if all the facts were admitted, does not state facts sufficient to constitute any right to relief. It is further, contended that the evidence does not sustain the allegations of the petition fairly construing the most adverse testimony and taking it as uncontradicted. Plaintiff in error further contends that, even if plaintiff b

¶1 This is an appeal by plaintiff in error, individually, and as president in behalf of the Guaranty Laundry Company, a corporation, from an order of the trial court denying the motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver. Defendant in error, secretary and assistant manager, filed the cross-appeal from an order granting a permanent injunction restraining her from interfering with plaintiff in

¶1 This is an action by Walter S. Gragg, plaintiff below, defendant in error, against Estella Teuscher and Frank Teuscher, defendants below, plaintiffs in error, in the district court of Logan county, Okla., wherein plaintiff prays the court, sitting as a court of equity, to decree and establish against the principal defendant, Estella Teuscher, and her husband, Frank Teuscher, a constructive tru

Michael Robinson sued Stillwater Medical Center, et al. seeking apportionment of settlement funds claiming:

1. Plaintiff Robinson, was injured in an automobile collision on September 8,
2010;

2. As a result of the above referenced incident, Plaintiff Robinson asserted a claim for injuries and damages;

3. The liable party’s insurance company, Farmers Insurance Group

Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. (GKH), a Tennessee-based law firm, seeks relief from the automatic stay of adversary proceedings resulting from the bankruptcy of one of its former clients, Steve A. McKenzie. GKH contends that it is entitled to an equity interest in certain assets that McKenzie pledged to the firm shortly before he was placed into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee, C. Kenneth S

Appellant Robin Lupole Anastasi (“Robin�) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a bench trial on the petition for divorce filed by appellee Jeffrey Scott Anastasi (“Jeff�). In its judgment, the trial court granted a divorce to Jeff on the ground of insupportability, appointed Robin and Jeff joint managing conservators of the minor children D.E.A. and C.J.A., and gave Jeff the exc

Blaine Spears and Jill McCabe sued Andrew Martinez on an auto negligence theory claiming:

1. On November 25, 2009, there was a collision in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, involving a vehicle driven by Defendant and a vehicle in which Plaintiff was a passenger.

2. Said collision was caused by Defendant’s negligence, causing Plaintiffs to suffer damages in an amount not yet determined,

Before us is a restricted appeal by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo).1 The latter, through the appeal, attacks a Judicial Finding of Fact and Conclusion Regarding a Documentation or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien or Claim. The two documents or instruments encompassed by the Judicial Finding and purporting to create a lien or claim are an “Appointment of Substitute Trusteeâ€� and a â€

This appeal arises out of probate proceedings related to the estate of Michael C. Roper. Michael’s brother, William A. Roper, Jr., is a potential heir to Michael’s estate.1 When the appellee, CitiMortgage, Inc., sought to enforce its security interest on a certain piece of real property (the Property) that is part of Michael’s estate and to sell the Property, Roper intervened and opposed Cit

Appellant Wallace Roofing, Inc. (Wallace Roofing) brought suit against appellee Linda Benson (Benson) for breach of contract alleging she had failed to pay money owed on a contract for roofing and home repairs. Benson brought counterclaims under the Texas Debt Collection Practices Act (TDCPA), a tie-in statute to the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), alleging that Wallace Roofing’s unlawful

¶1 This appeal presents a lien priority contest. Plaintiff GasRock Capital, L.L.C. (GasRock) appeals from an Order granting summary judgment in favor of lien claimant Defendant Pan American Drilling Services, L.L.C. (Pan American) in this foreclosure action.1 In essence, this order determined Pan American's statutory oil and gas lien had priority over GasRock's mortgage lien on certain oil and ga

The debtor, Bryan S. Behrens (the “Debtor�) appeals from the order of the bankruptcy court granting U.S. Bank 1 National Association as Trustee for RAMP 2006 NC2, by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the “Creditor�), relief from the automatic stay. The bankruptcy court did so without holding a hearing other than one that was held in the Debtor’s wife’s case. We have jurisdiction over this app

The debtor, Bryan S. Behrens (the “Debtor�) appeals from the order of the bankruptcy court granting U.S. Bank 1 National Association as Trustee for RAMP 2006 NC2, by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the “Creditor�), relief from the automatic stay. The bankruptcy court did so without holding a hearing other than one that was held in the Debtor’s wife’s case. We have jurisdiction over this app

5 J AVIATION, L.L.C. sued BANK OF AMERICA; TRAJEN FLIGHT SUPPORT L.P. d/b/a ATLANTIC AVIATION; FREDERICK RANDOLPH CRAFT, JR. an individual; BRUCE LYNDON MOORE, an individual; THOMAS RICHARD HUNTINGTON JR., an individual; and, KONI L. COUTS-SPEARS, an individual on civil fraud theories claiming:

1. Plaintiff is an Oklahoma limited liability company, with its principal place ofbusiness in O

Alice Berry and Truman Berry sued Krista Cavery on an auto negligence theory claiming:

1. Plaintiffs are residents of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

2. Defendant is a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

3. This cause of action arose in Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

6. Ms. Berry suffered significant personal injuries and damages as a result of

4. This Court has jurisdiction an

[¶1] Gary L. Hopkins and Mary Hopkins appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Bank of the West.1 The Hopkins claim that material facts concerning a contract are in dispute, making summary judgment inappropriate. Specifically, they argue the contract’s language is ambiguous and the district court should have considered extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent

[¶1] The appellants, George M. Sonnett, Jr. and Wendy Z. Burgers Sonnett, filed a complaint against the appellees, First American Title Insurance Company and First American Title Insurance Company of Sublette County (collectively “First American�). In their complaint, the Sonnetts alleged that First American breached the terms of the title insurance policy, was negligent, and acted in bad fai

Appellant, Intermountain Real Properties, LLC (Intermountain), appeals the Bingham County district court’s grant of summary judgment to Respondent, Draw, LLC (Draw). Intermountain initially brought a cause of action, as an assignee of a materialmen’s lien, against Draw and other defendants to recover payment on work paving a private drive in the Taylorview Development. The district court grant

AIM Business Capital, LLC sued Madison Plate Processing, Inc. and Lance P. McGuire on conversion, declaratory judgment and equitable relief theories claiming:

1. Plaintiff is a Louisiana limited liability company doing business in Louisiana, with its registered office being located in the Parish of Lafayette, State of Louisiana.

2. Defendant, Madison Plate Processing, LLC (someti

The City of Tulsa sued David Dean Dobson, Sharon Kay Dobson, Fern Maxine Sunderland, Cellco Partnership, DBA Verizon Wireless, et al. on an eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendants for public purposes.

1. Plaintiff/Condemnor is a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and