Debra J. Fields v. Bill Hayden |
[¶1] Debra J. Fields appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) in favor of Bill and Patricia Hayden on Fields’s complaint alleging that the Haydens were negligent as landlords of tenants whose dog attacked Fields on three separate occasions. Because no genuine dispute of material fact exists as to the Haydens’ lack of possession or control over... More... $0 (11-05-2013 - ME) |
Mahayla Silliman v. Teddy Adkins |
Mahayla Silliman sued Teddy Adkins on an intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence theories claiming: |
Lara M. Shilling v. Whole Foods Mark Rocky Mountain Southwest, L.P. |
Lara M. Shilling and Jason Shilling sued Whole Foods Mark Rocky Mountain Southwest, L.P., WFM-WO, Inc. d/b/a Whole Foods Market, Inc. on premises liability and loss of consortium theories claiming: |
Robert Friedrich v. Fetterman and Associates, P.A. |
The Petitioners seek review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Fetterman & Assocs., P.A. v. Friedrich, 69 So. 3d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). In this negligence case, the key issue is whether the Fourth District Court of Appeal impermissibly reweighed the testimony of expert witnesses during trial. We conclude that by reweighing the evidence, the Fourth District’s decision bel... More... $0 (10-24-2013 - FL) |
Carolyn Bearden v. Delaware Crossing Condominiums Association, Inc. |
Carolyn Bearden sued the Delaware Crossing Condominiums Association, Inc. on a premises liability theory. |
Cody Trosclair v. Anthony and Karen McMillan |
In this premises liability case, appellant, Cody Trosclair, appeals the trial court’s grant of no-evidence summary judgment in favor of appellees, Anthony and Karen McMillan. In four issues, Trosclair argues that (1) the McMillans produced no competent summary judgment evidence to establish that he was a |
Georgeann Wilson v. Sheridan Royal Properties, LLC d/b/a 31st Street Mall |
Georgeann Wilson v. Sheridan Royal Properties, LLC d/b/a 31st Street Mall on a premises liability theory claiming to have been injured while a business invitee on Defendant's property as a result of a dangerous condition that Defendant knew or should have known existed. |
Brian Gobble v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation |
¶1 We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment in this premises liability case. The owner of the premises, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, did not owe a duty in connection with the operation of the crane involved in the accident. Although Chesapeake exercised some control over the schedule for completing the construction project, and the site plan designating the work zones, the instrume... More... $0 (10-11-2013 - OK) |
Colleen Hill v. Superior Property Management Services, Inc. |
¶1 A condominium resident was injured when she tripped on a group of tree root offshoots concealed within the grassy common area of her complex. She sued the complex‘s contract property management company, which was tasked with performing some maintenance activities in that area. She claimed that the company had been negligent in dealing with the tree offshoots, asserting that it had breached d... More... $0 (10-11-2013 - UT) |
Stephanie Nettles v. Buy For Less |
Stephanie Nettles sued Buy For Less, Buy For Less Pharmacy, Buy For Less Mart, Inc., BFL-Mgmt, Inc. and Pharmacy Management, Inc. on premises liability theories claiming: |
Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC v. Marco Murillo |
In this personal injury lawsuit, appellant Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC (“Oncor”) appeals a judgment rendered on a jury verdict against it and in favor of appellee Marco Murillo, an employee of Leo Gomez d/b/a AAA Demolishing (“AAA”). Murillo sustained serious personal injuries from |
Marilyn Westemier v. Zarrow Families Foundation |
Marilyn Westemier sued the Zarrow Families Foundation claiming: |
Sharon Bowler Bennett v. Subway Sandwiches & Salads, Inc. |
Sharon Bowler Bennett sued Subway Sandwiches & Salads, Inc. and Rottinghaus Company, Inc. on negligence theories claiming: |
Ybelka Hernandez v. Kraft Academy of Gymnastics |
Ybelka Hernandez sued Kraft Academy of Gymnastics on a premises liability theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of a dangerous condition on defendant's property while a business invitee thereon of which the defendant knew or should have know with the exercise of due care. |
TREIMee Corp. d/b/a Park on Westview Apts and Park on Westview Apartments, LP v. Armando Garcia |
In this premises liability case, appellants, TREIMee Corp. d/b/a Park on Westview Apts (“TREIMee”) and Park on Westview Apartments, LP (“Park on Westview”), appeal from the trial court’s judgment rendered on the jury verdict in |
Susan Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc. |
Susan and Steven Schrock filed suit against brand-name and generic manufacturers of the drug metoclopramide, alleging that Susan Schrock’s use of generic metoclopramide caused her to develop tardive dyskinesia, a neurological disorder characterized by involuntary body movements. The district court dismissed all claims in favor of the manufacturers in a series of orders. On appeal, the Schrocks c... More... $0 (08-28-2013 - OK) |
Darline Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
Darline Reed sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on a premises liability theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged while a business invitee at a Wal-Mart Store in Rogers County, Oklahoma. |
Olivia Diane Neely v. Event 1 Productions, Inc. |
Olivia Diane Neely sued Event 1 Productions, Inc. on an premises liability theory claiming: |
Rhonda Spain v. C-P Integrated Services, Inc. |
Rhonda Spain sued C-P Integrated Services, Inc. and the City of Moore claiming: |
Linda Moulton v. Steven Schardein, Inc. |
Linda Moulton sued Steven Schardein, Inc. d/b/a Schardein & Company on a premises liability theory claiming: |
Richard Cotner v. 3m Company |
Richard and Marilyn Cotner sued 3m Company and others claiming: |
Amy Edison v. CVS Pharmacy |
Amy Edison sued CVS Pharmacy, Oklahoma CVS Pharmacy a/k/a CVS Caremark on premises liability theories claiming: |
Ellen Sedita v. Royal Sweeping and Paving, LLC |
Appellant, Ellen Sedita, challenges the trial court’s rendition of summary judgment in favor of appellee, Royal Sweeping and Paving, L.L.C. (“Royal Sweeping”), in her suit against Royal Sweeping and others for negligence, negligent activity, and premises liability. In two issues, Sedita contends that the |
Kevin Enright v. First Church of the Nazarene |
Kevin Enright and Rachelle Enright, individually and as parents and next friends of J.E., a minor, sued the First Church of the Nazarene on a negligence theory claiming: |
Sandra J. Pohl v. Quality Inn Downtown |
Sandra J. Pohl sued the Quality Inn Downtown in Oklahoma City on a premises liability theory claiming: |
Next Page |