United States of America v. Paul Emerson Schofield and Sara Ellen Schofield |
Jefferson City, Missouri criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with video recording their sexual assault of a child victim. |
United States of America v. John Muccio |
Norfolk, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sending threatening messages online. |
State of Maine v. Vladek Filler |
Ellsworth, Maine defendant Vladek Filler was charged with one count of gross sexual assault and tow counts of misdemeanor assault. |
Vladek Filler v. Hancock County, et al. |
Concluding that a defendant committed the tort of malicious prosecution, the Court awards $1,769,354 in compensatory, economic, and punitive damages in favor of a man the defendant falsely accused of committing gross sexual assaults and assaults against his then wife. The Court's verdict and judgment runs against his now ex-wife's friend, who conspired with his wife to concoct the allegations that $0 (03-12-2019 - ME) |
United States of America v. Dexter Enwerem |
New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud and tax offenses stemming from a scheme that defrauded women approached through their social media accounts. |
United States of America v. Donald William Laun |
Rapid City, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted enticement of a minor using the Internet in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422(b). $0 (10-27-2023 - SD) |
United States of America v. Jonathan Tyrell Haney |
Texarkana, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with using the internet to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity. |
United States of America v. Timothy L. Guy |
Evansville, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm and ammunition by a felon, receiving stolen U.S. government property, and possession of child sexual abuse material. |
United States of America v. Pasquale Theodore Salas |
Galveston, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with producing and possessing child pornography. |
United States of America v. Kuang Myat |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Coercion and Enticement of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity, Production of Material Depicting the Sexual Exploitation of a Minor, and Distribution of Material Depicting the Sexual Exploitation of a Minor. |
United States of America v. Jeremy Carson Lamb |
Tucson, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted production of sex abuse material. Lamb pleaded guilty on June 13, 2023, to one count of Attempted Production of Child Pornography. |
United States of America v. Richard Wesley Robinson |
Baltimore, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with enticement and coercion of a minor to engage in sexual activity. |
Gregory P. Mango v. Newsmax Media, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
United States of America v. Timothy Martinez |
Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with r two counts of sexual exploitation and attempted sexual exploitation of a minor, one count of attempted receipt of child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography. |
United States of America v. Kenoy Stewart |
New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud. |
United States of America v. Daniel D. Konruff |
Lincoln, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of child pornography. |
United States of America v. Philip George Turner |
Knoxville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of distribution of child pornography. |
Andrew Perrong v. Gacovina, Lake & Associates, et al. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227). |
United States of America v. Mark Samuel Baker |
Missoula, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to solicit a minor for sex. |
United States of America v. Lamar Allen Thompson |
Tacoma, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with producing and possessing images of child sexual abuse. |
United States of America, et al. v. Google, LLC |
Washington, DC civil litigation lawyers representing the Plaintiff claimed that the Defendants wrongfully engaged in activities and strategies to monopolize Internet search. |
United States of America v. Corey Johnson |
Tyler, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of children by force, fraud, or coercion. |
United States of America v. Mark Joseph Uhlenbrock |
San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with Internet stalking. |
United States of America v. Olugbenge Lawal |
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering. |
United States of America v. Brandon Bourret |
Denver, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with production of child pornography. |
Next Page |