This matter comes to this court after landlord/appellant California
Union Square L.P. (Union Square) and tenant/respondent Saks Company
L.L.C. (Saks) participated in two arbitration proceedings regarding the rent
Saks should pay for a building it leased from Union Square. The trial court
vacated the first arbitration award (in favor of Union Square) and confirmed
the second arb... More...   $0 (06-12-2020 - CA)

In June 2017, the Warren County Grand Jury indicted appellant on 17 sexual offenses in Case No. 17CR33134 that included rape, gross sexual imposition, and sexual battery.These offenses were alleged to have been committed against his biological daughter, S.D., from the ages of four to twelve years old. Later in December 2018, appellant
was indicted by the Warren County Grand Jury on two additio... More...   $0 (06-11-2020 - OH)

Prior to September 2015, Jones and his wife ("Wife") jointly owned and
resided at a home located at 8633 Cheshire Court in Franklin, Ohio. In September 2015,
after divorce proceedings were initiated between the couple, Wife moved to 7103 Country
Walk Drive in Franklin, Ohio. After moving to Country Walk Drive, Wife updated her address
with the post office to reflect that she had m... More...   $0 (06-11-2020 - OH)

A funnel hovered over the American West. Into the large
end went investor dollars and investor dreams. Out the little end
streamed dollars into Las Vegas, where a Nevada intermediary
made loans to Nevada land developers who had high hopes for big
projects. The funnel channeled over $40 million in 2006 and
2007. But remember what happened next: the subprime
meltdown. The inv... More...   $0 (06-11-2020 - CA)

Title 16, section 433.2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the Holder
Rule), promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), requires
consumer credit contracts to include the following notice: “ANY HOLDER OF
THIS CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL CLAIMS
AND DEFENSES WHICH THE DEBTOR COULD ASSERT AGAINST THE
SELLER OF GOODS OR SERVICES OBTAINED PURSUANT HERETO ORMore...   $0 (06-10-2020 - ca)

Appellant, North Murrieta Community, LLC (North Murrieta), is the master
developer of a large development project in the City of Murrieta (the City) called the
Golden City Project.
As part of the planning and approval process, North Murrieta sought to take
advantage of certain statutory land use planning tools—vesting tentative maps and
development agreements—that enable builde... More...   $0 (06-09-2020 - CA)

Appellant was originally indicted on two counts of rape (counts one and
four), in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), each felonies of the first degree; one count of
rape (count five), in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), a felony of the first degree; and five
counts of GSI (counts two, three, six, seven, and eight), in violation of R.C.
2907.05(A)(4), each felonies of the third deg... More...   $0 (06-08-2020 - OH)

Detroit, MI - The United States of America charged Gary Jones with conspiracy to embezzle UAW union funds.

Gary Jones, the former President of the international United Auto Workers union, pleaded guilty today to conspiring with other high-level UAW officials to embezzle over $1 million of UAW dues money, to further racketeering activity, and to evade taxes announced U.S. Attorney Matthew ... More...   $0 (06-07-2020 - MI)

On September 25, 1997, a Franklin County Grand Jury indicted appellant on
charges of aggravated robbery, a violation of R.C. 2911.01, a felony of the first degree;
robbery, a violation of R.C. 2911.02, a felony of the second degree; assault on a peace officer,
a violation of R.C. 2903.13, a felony of the fourth degree; and failure to comply, a violation
of R.C. 2921.331, a felony o... More...   $0 (06-05-2020 - OH)

The state appeals from the trial court's decision that granted P.J.F.'s
application to seal the record of his fifth-degree felony conviction for nonsupport of
dependents in Franklin County Common Pleas case No. 10CR-3828. Guided by our
precedents and the law, we determine that P.J.F. did not demonstrate that he was eligible
for expungement and the trial court therefore lacked juris... More...   $0 (06-04-2020 - OH)

The case giving rise to this appeal involves allegations that Rhoades violated
a civil protection order requiring him to stay away from Jaide Reinhard ("Jaide"). Rhoades
and Jaide were previously in a relationship and have a child together. In August 2017, Jaide
petitioned for a domestic violence civil protection order from the Franklin County Court of
Common Pleas, Division of Dom... More...   $0 (06-04-2020 - OH)

The general issue is whether you can sue police in civil
court for excessive force after you have been convicted in criminal
court. Specifically, after interacting with an officer, a man was
convicted of an infraction: disturbing the peace.
Notwithstanding this conviction, can this man then sue the
officer civilly for using excessive force during the episode? Yes,
because t... More...   $0 (06-04-2020 - CA)

The pertinent facts and procedural history of this case were set forth by this
court in our decision in State v. Mack, 10th Dist. No. 16AP-680, 2017-Ohio-7417, as follows:
On May 31, 1994, appellant entered guilty pleas to a stipulated
lesser included offense of Count 1 of the indictment,
aggravated murder without the capital specifications but with
the firearm specification, a... More...   $0 (06-03-2020 - OH)

BACKGROUND
Individual taxpayers (Plaintiffs) filed a writ petition and complaint for
declaratory and injunctive relief, seeking to compel the DMV to stop
suspending driver’s licenses without notification of a violation of the
Misdemeanor Statute.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. The DMV provides courts
with electronic and paper methods to notify it of a person... More...   $0 (06-03-2020 - CA)

Matthew Boermeester was expelled from the University of
Southern California (USC) for committing intimate partner violence
against Jane Roe.1 The superior court denied his petition for writ of
administrative mandate to set aside the expulsion. He appeals,
contending, among other things, that the process leading to his
expulsion violated his right to a fair hearing. We conclude ... More...   $0 (06-01-2020 - CA)

In February 2017, plaintiff-appellee city of Brook Park (“the city”)
passed Ordinance No. 10064-2016 that amended Chapter 153.06 of the Brook Park
Codified Ordinances to provide hospitalization and/or medical insurance benefits
to a group of retired employees in an amount that equated to $100 per month. In
response, FOP filed a grievance challenging the ordinance. FOP claimed that ... More...   $0 (05-31-2020 - OH)