| United States of America v. Robert Woody |
|
Clarksburg, West Virginia criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. |
| Levinson Smith & Huffman, P.C., et al. v. Trevor Henson, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on fraud, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, constructive trust, alter ego liability, unjust enrichment, equitable accounting, and conversion of personal property theories. |
| United States of America v. Matthew Boyd |
|
Portland, Maine criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with sexually abusing a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C.7(3), 2243(a)and 2246(2)(A). |
| State of Wisconsin v. David Kahl |
|
Madison, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represent defendant charged with first-degree intentional homicide. |
| State of Wisconsin v. Darrell Brooks, Jr. |
|
No Waukesha, Wisconsin criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with multiple counts of first-degree intentional homicide for attacking a Christmas parade in 2021. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Benjamin Robert Cole, Sr. |
|
Claremore, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented Defendant charged with first-degree child abuse murder in violation of 21 O.S. 701.7, which provides: |
| Mickail Myles v. County of San Diego, et al. |
|
San Diego, California personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights excessive force violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| James Johnson v. Transforce, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans With Disabilities Act job discrimination in employment theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, which provides: |
| State of Wisconsin v. Waylon Thomas Wayman |
|
Green Bay, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with first-degree intentional homicide. |
| Marty G. Ringham and Premiere Plus Realty Company v. Craig Bernstein and Varna Bernstein |
Dallas, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellants with a interlocutory appeal denying their special appearances in a lawsuit filed.The live petition states that in about early 2020, Texas resident Craig Bernstein listed a Florida condominium unit he owned (the property) for sale with a Florida real estat More... $0 (10-03-2022 - TX)
|
| United States of America v. Garrin Michael Thompson |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with engaging in criminal sexual conduct with three children. |
| Robert L. Bradley, Jr., as Independent Executor of the Estate of Margaret Bradley v. Sandra S. Chapman and Fred Lohmeyer, as Executor and Legal Representative of the Estate of Roger C. Chapman |
San Antonio, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellant with appealing from a judgment determining that he cannot enforce an agreement.W.G. Kinney owned a tract of land in Hunt, Texas (the "Kinney Tractâ€) on which he built a tennis court and other facilities. In 1977, Margaret Bradley purchased More... $0 (09-30-2022 - TX)
|
| Pizza Inn, Inc. v. Fawzi Odetallah |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in a breach of franchise agreement dispute. |
| State of Arizona v. Jon Christopher Clark |
|
Phoenix, Arizona criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with second-degree murder and tampering with physical evidence. |
| David Polston; Inland Environmental and Remediation, Inc.; Inland Recycling, L.L.C.; and Boundary Ventures, Inc. v. The State of Texas, Lower Colorado River Authority, and Colorado County, Texas |
Austin, Texas – Environmental Litigation lawyer represented Appellants with appealing from an injunction to operate a waste-processing facility.Polston is the president of Inland Environmental and Remediation, Inland Recycling, and Boundary Ventures. Appellants own and/or operate a waste-processing facility More... $0 (09-22-2022 - TX)
|
| Lon Smith & Associates, Inc., and A-1 Systems, Inc. d/b/a Lon Smith Roofing and Construction v. Joe Key and Stacci Key |
Fort Worth, Texas – Business Law lawyer represented Appellant appealing denial a Motion to Compel Arbitration.This is part two of this court's saga with this litigation. Part one (Smith 1), can be read at Lon Smith & Assocs., Inc. v. Key, 527 S.W.3d 604 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2017, pet. denied). The facts More... $0 (09-20-2022 - TX)
|
| State of North Dakota v. Arthur Prince Kollie |
|
Fargo, North Dakota criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with intentional, knowing or with extreme indifference murder of a child, robbery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Norman William Jansen, Jr. |
|
El Reno, OK: criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with assault and battery by means of force as isling to produce death in violation of 21 O.S. 652. |
| Wade Harrell Thomson v. The State of Texas |
Houston, Texas – Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a possession of child pornography charges.Deputy M. Payne stopped Thomson for a routine traffic violation at almost midnight on a Monday night. Thomson—who was over 40 years old—had a young, female passenger in his car. Deputy Pay More... $0 (09-14-2022 - TX)
|
| Robert Hardie Tibaut Bowman and Powers L. Bowman v. Molly Bowman Stephens |
Houston, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellants with challenging a judgment to force a partition by sale of lake property.This appeal is from the second stage of a partition proceeding. In the first stage, this Court affirmed the trial court's judgment that a partition in kind was feasible and that S More... $0 (09-14-2022 - TX)
|
| The State of Texas v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. dba Wharton; and Wharton County Foods, LLC |
Houston, Texas – Business Litigation lawyer represented defendant with an interlocutory appeal concerning the sale of eggs during the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. is the largest producer and marketer of shell eggs in the United States. The company is a conglomerate comprised of its own op More... $0 (09-13-2022 - TX)
|
| United States of America v. Vincent Marchetti, Jr |
|
Texarkana criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with Health Care Kickback Conspiracy. |
| State of Ohio v. Thomas Aspseter |
|
Sparta, Wisconsin criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with first-degree intentional homicide, attempted 1st-Degree intentional homicide, aggravated battery, and use of a dangerous weapon. |
| William Kameron Robards, et al. v. BLK Out Transport, et al. |
|
Louisville, Kentucky civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants claiming that they were discrminated against because of their race. |
| State Mut. Life Assurance Company v. Tony F. Hampton, Jr., et al. |
|
¶1 Interlocutory certiorari was granted by this Court to review a certified order from the District Court of Tulsa County. Following a pre-trial hearing, the trial court made the following findings and conclusions, which were certified to this Court: |
|
Next Page |