Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Wisconsin v. David Kahl
Date: 10-28-2022
Case Number:
Judge: Chris Taylor
Court: Circuit Court, Dane County, Wisconsin
Plaintiff's Attorney: Dane County Wisconsin District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
David Kahl, age 56, was accused for killing Brittany Zimmerman who was strangled and stabbed in the middle of the day in her downtown Madison apartment no April 2, 2008.
940.01  First-degree intentional homicide.
(1)  Offenses.
(a) Except as provided in sub. (2), whoever causes the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class A felony.
(b) Except as provided in sub. (2), whoever causes the death of an unborn child with intent to kill that unborn child, kill the woman who is pregnant with that unborn child or kill another is guilty of a Class A felony.
(2) Mitigating circumstances. The following are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd-degree intentional homicide under s. 940.05:
(a) Adequate provocation. Death was caused under the influence of adequate provocation as defined in s. 939.44.
(b) Unnecessary defensive force. Death was caused because the actor believed he or she or another was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that the force used was necessary to defend the endangered person, if either belief was unreasonable.
(c) Prevention of felony. Death was caused because the actor believed that the force used was necessary in the exercise of the privilege to prevent or terminate the commission of a felony, if that belief was unreasonable.
(d) Coercion; necessity. Death was caused in the exercise of a privilege under s. 939.45 (1).
940.01(3)
(3) Burden of proof. When the existence of an affirmative defense under sub. (2) has been placed in issue by the trial evidence, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the facts constituting the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of guilt under sub.
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Wisconsin v. David Kahl?
The outcome was: Defendant pleaded guilty.
Which court heard State of Wisconsin v. David Kahl?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Dane County, Wisconsin, WI. The presiding judge was Chris Taylor.
Who were the attorneys in State of Wisconsin v. David Kahl?
Plaintiff's attorney: Dane County Wisconsin District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Madison Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free..
When was State of Wisconsin v. David Kahl decided?
This case was decided on October 28, 2022.