Houston, Texas civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act.


Plaintiff filed the Complaint on September 19, 2022.[3] He states that he is disabled as defined by the ADA and that he uses a wheelchair for mobility.[4] Defendant is an owner of property located at 10001 Westheimer, Houston, TX 77042 ("the Property

Cincinnati, Ohio employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violation theory.



In September 2020, the named plaintiffs-a number of former "home-health aides"- brought this suit against A&L Homecare &Training, LLC and its owners (collectively, "A&L") under the FLSA and Ohio law. The plaintiffs alleged that A&L had paid the

Camden, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a Second Amendment violation theory claiming that New Jersey's firearm laws are unconstitutional.


“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” U.S. Const. amend. II. For more than 200 y

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant challenging Defendant's special events ordinance and seeking an injunction.


Aurora Pride's lawsuit concerns both past and ongoing events. In part, the lawsuit concerns the 2022 Aurora Pride Parade. In 2022, the city temporarily revoked Aurora Pride's permit and charged Aurora Pride certain police over

West Palm Beach, Florida consumer law lawyer represent Plaintiff who sued defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides, in part:

(b) Restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment
(1) ProhibitionsIt shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is withi

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale

San Antonio, Texas family law lawyers represented Petition and Respondent in a matter involving an application for an order returning a child to Mexico pursuant to the Hague Convention.

This case arises under the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the “Hague Convention” or “Convention”), Oct. 24, 1980, T.I.A.S. No. 11670, S.

Springfield, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights theories.

"Prisoner civil rights law is a body of law that protects the rights of people who are incarcerated. This law is based on the U.S. Constitution and federal and state laws.

The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. This

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma education law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who challenged school quarantine policy.


¶1 During the summer of 2021, Appellants, Edmond Public School Board Members and Edmond Public School District Superintendent, Angela Grunewald, (collectively "District") anticipated a complete return to in-person instruction for the 2021-2022 school year. Prior to the star

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.

15 U.S.C. 1114 provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distrib

Seattle, Washington consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories.

Defendants claimed to have identified “a real question” regarding the viability of plaintiffs' autodialer claims, and plaintiffs have not shown that they will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir.

St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant claiming that Plaintiff's First Amendment Constitutional rights were violated by Defendant.

Plaintiffs Raven Wolf C. Felton Jennings II (“Jennings”) and Raymond Douglas (“Douglas”) are street musicians who perform in the University City Loop Special Business District (“the Loop�

¶1 The Petitioners consist of healthcare providers, Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic, LLC, Alan Braid, M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and an advocacy group, the Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice. The Respondents consist of the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, the district attorneys of Oklahom

Shreveport, Louisiana Plaintiff representing himself without counsel sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights theories.

San Francisco, California breach of contrct lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a beach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a result.

Federal Courthouse - S

More...   $0 (02-17-2023 - CA)