Marie Mayerova, et al. v. Eastern Michigan University, et al. |
Detroit, Michigan civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants violated Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause by failing to provide sufficient opportunities for women to participate in athletics. This lawsuit was filed following EMU's decision to eliminate four teams; men's wrestling, men's swimming and diving, women's tennis, and women's softball. Plaintiffs seek to r... More... $0 (12-06-2023 - MI)
|
United States of America v. Lerin E. Hughes |
Springfield, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking. |
Reed Timmer v. Medialinks TV, LLC |
Washington, DC intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright violation theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
United States of America v. Dominic Lambert |
Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking. |
A.B. and A.M.B, et al. v. Hawaii State Department of Education and OAHU Interscholastic Association |
Honolulu, Hawaii civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on Title X class action violations. |
United States of America v. Zarzamora Healthcare LLC, doing business as Rite-Away Pharmacy & Medical Supply #2, and Jitendra Chaudhary, |
San Antonio, Texas civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants accused of wrongfully dispensing of opioids and other controlled substances. |
John C. Eastman v. Bennie Thompson |
Santa Ana, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking an injunction against the Defendant to prevent it from responding to a subpeona which it received the the House Committing seeking production of email messages between Donald Trump and the Plaintiff. |
Jenna M. DiMartile, et al. v. Kathleen Hochul, et al. |
Albany, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants challenging the legality of regulations relating to the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
Elevance Health, Inc. v. Vinod Mohan |
Indianapolis, Indiana commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a misappropriation of trade secrets theory. |
Edward Pollner, et al. v. Tri-State Tournaments, LLC |
Central Islip, New York commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming $200,000 as a direct result of the breach. |
Norman Danielewicz v. Flagship Bank Minnesota, N.A. |
Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty theory. |
Constance Iloh v. Regents of the University of California, et al. |
Santa Ana, California employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking a writ of mandate, declaratory relief and injunctive relief. |
Jacqueline Damon v. Navsav Holdings, LLC |
Omaha, Nebraska employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued her former employer challenging a restrictive covenant in an employment contract. |
United States of America v. Jonathan Trayes |
Portland, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with cyberstalking. |
Raymond Stinde v. Joshua Schoenbeck, et al. |
East St. Louis, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theories. |
United States of America v. Tyler James Stephens |
Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement. |
Zvitaliy Strizheus v. The City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
Sioux Falls, South Dakota civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants taking of property without just compensation. |
Andrew T. Miller v. William K. Marshall, et al. |
Charleston, West Virginia civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking an injunction |
Oregon Firearms Federation, et al. v. Tina Kotek, et al. |
Before this Court are two core questions: (1) can the State of Oregon limit the number of bullets to ten, that a law-abiding citizen can fire without reloading; and (2) can the State of Oregon require firearm purchasers to obtain a permit, which imposes various requirements, including a completed background check, safety training, and consideration of mental health status, before purchasing a fire... More... $0 (07-14-2023 - OR)
|
Donald Thomas Sharp v. S. Hampton |
Albuquerque, New Mexico pro se Plaintiff sued Defendant without a lawyer on a civil rights theory. |
Erik Garcia v. Sopros Investments Corporation |
Houston, Texas civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act. |
Brooke Clark v. A&L Homecare and Training Center, LLC, et al. |
Cincinnati, Ohio employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violation theory. |
Ronald Koons, et al. v. Matthew Platkin, et al. |
Camden, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a Second Amendment violation theory claiming that New Jersey's firearm laws are unconstitutional. |
Angela V. Goodall v. Beth Casper, et al. |
Louisville, Kentucky pro se Plaintiff sued Defendants on a federal question theory. |
Aurora Pride v. City of Aurora, et al. |
Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant challenging Defendant's special events ordinance and seeking an injunction. |
Next Page |