Charter Schools USA, Inc., The Downtown Charter School, Inc., Charter
Schools USA at Downtown Miami, L.C. (collectively Charter Schools) appeal
from an order denying their motion to dissolve writs of garnishment and to enforce
supersedeas bond. We find no error in the order on appeal and affirm.
This action was commenced on behalf of a minor child who claimed to have
been sexua

Tulsa, OK - Mary E. Wilson sued Arthur Williams on an auto negligence theory (car wreck).

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties to this case are not available.

See the Court docket below:

05-09-2011 TEXT 1 77950406 May 9 2011 2:28:42:743PM - $ 0.00
CIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000 INITIAL FILING.
05-09-2011 AUTONEG - 77950408 May 9 2011

Vinita, OK - The firm of Logan and Lowry, L.L.P. sued Melissa Kelson seeking a money judgment.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.

02/22/2012 FILE AND ENTER PETITION $163.00
LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT $6.00
DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT $2.00
Oklahoma Court Information System Fee - Effective 07/01/04 $25.00
LENGTHY TRIAL FUND $10.00

This is an appeal from the district court sitting in its appellate capacity and comes before this Court on review from the Idaho Court of Appeals. We reverse the decision of the district court and remand with instructions.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This is a dispute between two collections agencies, Medical Recovery Services, LLC (MRS) and Bonneville Billing and Collections, Inc

In this consolidated appeal, Brett J. Stettner (“Stettner”) appeals two trial
court orders: (1) denying his motion to set aside clerk’s default, to vacate default
final judgment and to quash a writ of garnishment; and (2) denying his motion to
set aside sheriff’s sale. For the reasons that follow, we reverse both orders.
On May 14, 2012, Stettner filed a Petition for Injunc

Christopher Jenkins challenges the district court’s order granting the City of
Cedar Park’s plea to the jurisdiction in a case arising under the Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’
Civil Service Act. See generally Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code §§ 143.001–.363 (the Civil Service Act or
the Act). Jenkins, a fire fighter, appealed his indefinite suspension to a hearing examiner, who<

Stephen J. Harper appeals the trial court’s order granting Spencer’s motion for scire facias to revive a dormant judgment against Harper. Harper contends that the August 2001 writ of garnishment issued by the trial court was not a “writ of
2
execution” that extended the enforceability of the judgment for an additional ten years beyond the date of the writ’s issuance and that, as

International Insurance Brokers, Ltd., LLC v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company

Issue # 1.
Issue: ABUSE OF PROCESS (OTHER)
Filed by: INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE BROKERS LTD LLC
Filed Date: 12/31/2013
Party Name: Disposition Information:

Defendant: HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Disposed: DISMISSED

¶1 The issue in this matter is whether an insurer may agree to cancel a "claims made" policy with the knowledge that a potential claim is pending without violating the statutory prohibition on retroactive annulment of an insurance policy following the injury, death, or damage for which the insured may be liable. See Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 3625 (2011). This Court holds that it may not and affirms

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 685.040,1 a judgment creditor is entitled to the reasonable and necessary costs of enforcing the judgment, including statutory attorney fees ―otherwise provided by law.‖ A motion to claim enforcement costs must, however, be made ―before the judgment is satisfied in full.‖ (§ 685.080, subd. (a).)
In the present case, plaintiff Fessha Taye, conserva

¶1 Summit County (the County) appeals the entry of judgment in favor of Jim Nebeker on Nebeker’s negligence claim. Nebeker cross-appeals, contending that the court improperly imposed a statutory cap to reduce the judgment from $594,400.21 to $221,400. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 John Rhineer was Nebeker’s accountant prior to Rhineer’s death on November 14, 2003. Later that year, Wells

¶ 1 On certiorari, we consider whether our court of appeals erred when it held that an action to enforce the ongoing right to collect a portion of pension retirement benefits was not barred by the statute of limitations. We also consider whether the court of appeals erred when it determined that the petitioner‘s argument concerning laches was inadequately briefed according to the standards set

¶1 The dispositive issue presented on certiorari is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of a father who claimed a homestead exemption in defending an action for fraudulent conveyance to prevent the collection of past-due alimony and child support. We find that, under the facts presented here, the father's attempt to convey property subject to a homestead exemption

In the midst of trial in the District Court, the parties agreed to a high-low settlement. Regardless of the verdict, the Bryan family was to receive at least $900,000. And regardless of the verdict, defendants Cindy Baxter and Renie Skalko were to pay no more than $2.7 million. So when the jury returned an $8.6 million verdict for the Bryans, Baxter and Skalko tendered $2.7 million and asked the B

¶1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it denied Defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment based on irregularity in obtaining a judgment pursuant to 12 O.S. 2011 §1031(3). We hold that it did and reverse the judgment.

I.

¶2 Kim Murie, Plaintiff/Appellee, filed a petition for negligence and intentional infliction of emotional di

Appellants Tammy Gong (“Gong”) and L&G Rosemead Garden LLC (“L&G”) (Gong and L&G are jointly referred to as “appellants”) seek to impose liability on the City of Rosemead (the “City”) for the alleged tortious conduct of John Tran (“Tran”), a former member of its City Council and former mayor of the City. Appellants allege that while L&G’s proposed real estate project was proc

In the trial court below, appellee Ashanti Johnson Turner1 sought “enforcement” of an agreed final decree of divorce respecting her and appellant Frank Pyrtle, III. The trial court granted, in part, the relief requested by Turner. In five issues on appeal, Pyrtle challenges the portions of the trial court’s order (1) awarding Turner a money judgment in the amount of $88,400 plus interest for

Appellee Donal S. Clark obtained a money judgment against Michael C. Orr. Then Orr gave $225,000 to appellant 24/7 Grill, LLC, which is owned by Orr and his wife. Clark applied for a post-judgment writ of garnishment to obtain the $225,000 in 24/7 Grill’s possession. After a bench trial, the trial court awarded Clark a judgment for $225,000 against 24/7 Grill. In one issue, 24/7 Grill contends t

In Lamar County, Texas, Donald Joseph Benton was indicted on three counts of failing to register or maintain registration as a sex offender. Pursuant to the terms of a negotiated plea agreement, the trial court sentenced Benton to five years’ confinement, which was to run concurrently with a pending parole revocation stemming from the three counts in the indictment. The final judgments, signed J

This is the fourth appeal arising out of two lawsuits regarding court reporter fees. In the first lawsuit filed in justice court, Houston Reporting Services (HRS) alleged that Veronica Davis, an attorney, breached her contractual obligation to pay for deposition transcripts. HRS obtained a post-answer default judgment

2

against Davis, and then used a court-appointed receiver to remov

Ty Warren Azeltine, 54, a resident of Walla Walla, was sentenced after having previously pleaded guilty in October, 2013 to Failure to Pay a Child Support Obligation, which is a misdemeanor offense. Senior United States District Court Judge Edward F. Shea sentenced Azeltine to a 30 month term of probation. Judge Shea ordered Azeltine to pay $106,725.23 in restitution, which represents the outstand

Ty Warren Azeltine, 54, a resident of Walla Walla, was sentenced after having previously pleaded guilty in October, 2013 to Failure to Pay a Child Support Obligation, which is a misdemeanor offense. Senior United States District Court Judge Edward F. Shea sentenced Azeltine to a 30 month term of probation. Judge Shea ordered Azeltine to pay $106,725.23 in restitution, which represents the outstand

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address whether Ohio courts may exercise inpersonam jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant based solely on the conduct of the defendant’s insurer. We hold that they may not.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Appellee, David Fraley, d.b.a. Fraley Trucking, an Ohio resident, filed this negligence action against appellants, the Estate of Timothy J. Oedin

Old Republic Insurance Company (“Old Republic”) and BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their post-judgment motion to intervene as a matter of right under Rule 52.12(a)(2)1 in a personal injury and property damage lawsuit brought

1 References to rules are to Missouri Court Rules (2013).

2

by Ricky Lee Griffitts (“Griffitts”) agai

McCoy Group Properties, LLC v. Camilles Sidewalk Cafe, Inc. and Cherry Street Wraps, Inc.

06-17-2010 DISPJP 1 CHERRY STREET WRAPS INC 74993542 Jun 17 2010 4:01:10:687PM - $ 0.00

HOGSHEAD, CHARLES: FOR OTEY, MILLIE: PARTIES APPEARED AGREED JUDGMENT OF PARTIES POSSESSION OF PROPERTY ONLY AGAINST NAMED DEFENDANTS, ALL OTHER ISSUES TO BE TRIED BEFORE DEBORAH SHALLCROSS, SIGN