M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

FLSA Law
 
Rhonda Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc., et al.





Plaintiff-Appellant Rhonda Nesbitt is a former massage therapy student who
attended a for-profit vocational school operated by Defendants-Appellees (“Steiner”).
Ms. Nesbitt, on behalf of a class of former students, brought suit claiming the students
... More...
   $0 (11-20-2018 - CO)

Yassine Baouch, et al. v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.



Morelaw Internet Marketing
National Find A Lawyer Directory




Omaha, NE - Yassine Baouch... More...
   $0 (11-14-2018 - NE)

Amanda Quiles v. Arthur J. Parent, Jr.

In this latest chapter in what originated as a wage and hour class action,
defendant Arthur J. Parent, Jr. (Parent) appeals from the amended judgment entered in
favor of plaintiff Amanda Quiles on her individual claim for wrongful employment
termination in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA; 29
U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). (All further statutory references ar... More...
   $0 (11-04-2018 - CA)

Amanda Quiles v. Arthur J. Parent, Jr.



Morelaw Internet Marketing
National Find A Lawyer Directory





In this latest chapte... More...
   $0 (11-03-2018 - CA)

Jackpot Harvesting Company, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Monterey County, Jose Roberto Lainez

Labor Code section 226.2,1 which became effective January 1, 2016, addresses the
manner in which piece-rate employees are to be compensated for rest and recovery
periods and other nonproductive time on the job (collectively, rest/NP time).
Subdivision (b) of the statute (hereafter section 226.2(b)) provides a safe harbor for an
employer that, prior to 2016, failed to properly compe... More...
   $0 (10-16-2018 - CA)

KEITH LUMRY v. STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, and ROBERT BLECHA










_

The facts here have already been summarized in both the prior Court of Appeals decision, Lumry v. State, 49 Kan. App. 2d 27... More...
   $0 (10-09-2018 - KS)

Jackpot Harvesting Company, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Monterey County, Jose Roberto Lainez

Labor Code section 226.2,1 which became effective January 1, 2016, addresses the
manner in which piece-rate employees are to be compensated for rest and recovery
periods and other nonproductive time on the job (collectively, rest/NP time).
Subdivision (b) of the statute (hereafter section 226.2(b)) provides a safe harbor for an
employer that, prior to 2016, failed to properly compe... More...
   $0 (10-09-2018 - CA)

Klein v. Cadian Capital Mgmt., LP





Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act requires corporate insiders, 11
including owners of more than ten p... More...
   $0 (10-08-2018 - NY)

Certified Tire and Service Centers Wage and Hour Cases

This is an appeal in a certified wage and hour class action following a judgment
after a bench trial in favor of defendants Certified Tire and Services Centers, Inc.
(Certified Tire) and Barrett Business Services. Inc. (collectively defendants). Plaintiffs
contend that Certified Tire violated the applicable minimum wage and rest period
requirements by implementing a compensation pr... More...
   $0 (10-04-2018 - CA)

R. Alexander Acosta v. Jani-King of Oklahoma, Inc.

This appeal arises out of the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of the
Secretary of Labor’s complaint against Jani-King of Oklahoma, Inc. For the reasons
below, we reverse.



Morelaw Internet Marketing

More...
   $0 (10-03-2018 - OK)

Valentin Tapia v. Blch 3rd Ave, LLC d/b/a Brick Lane Curry House





14 Plaintiffs‐Appellants Valentin Tapia, Romulo Ricano Balderas, and Eufemia
15 Castillo (collectively, “Appellants”) are former employees of Brick Lane Curry
16 House, a Manhattan restaurant. The res... More...
   $0 (10-03-2018 - NY)

Tapia v. Blch 3rd Ave LLC







Plaintiffs‐Appellants Valentin Tapia, Romulo Ricano Balderas, and Eufemia 14
Castillo (collectiv... More...
   $0 (10-01-2018 - NY)

In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Wage and Hour Litigation




Plaintiffs in this purported class action seek compensation under Nevada and Arizona law for time spent undergoing or waiting to undergo mandatory onsite security screenings at the Amazon facilities where they worked. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendants on... More...
   $0 (09-26-2018 - KY)

Alejandro Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc.




The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., requires that
employers pay employees one‐and‐a‐half times their regular rate of pay for every
hour exceeding forty each workweek... More...
   $0 (09-23-2018 - NY)

Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's, L.L.C. District of Arizona Federal Courthouse - Phoenix, Arizona

Congress enacted the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) in 1938 in response to a national concern that the price of American development was the exploitation of an entire class of low-income workers. President Roosevelt, who pushed for fair labor legislation, famously declared: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide eno... More...   $0 (09-19-2018 - AZ)

Jonathan Gaffers v. Kelly Services, Inc. Eastern District of Michigan Federal Courthouse - Detroit, Michigan

The Supreme Court recently held that the National Labor Relations Act does not invalidate individual arbitration agreements. Epic Systems Corp. v.
>
No. 16-2210 Gaffers v. Kelly Servs., Inc. Page 2
Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612, 1632 (2018). That holding answers half of this case. The other half, in which the plaintiffs seek to carve out a separate destiny for the Fair Labor Standards Act, me... More...
   $0 (08-16-2018 - MI)

Douglas Troester v. Starbucks Corporation

Upon a request by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.548), we agreed to answer the following question:
Does the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s de minimis doctrine, as stated in
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. (1946) 328 U.S. 680, 692, and Lindow v.
United States (9th Cir. 1984) 738 F.2d 1057, 1063, apply to claims for unpai... More...
   $0 (07-27-2018 - CA)

Jose Luis Morales v. 22nd District Agricultural Association Morelaw Internet Marketing National Find A Lawyer Directory 888-354-4529

In this appeal, we must determine whether a state entity whose employees are
exempt from state law requiring the payment of overtime compensation is nevertheless
required to pay overtime compensation to such employees when the state entity jointly
employs the employees with a non-state employer. Although we concluded in a prior
appeal in this case that the matter should be remanded... More...
   $0 (07-11-2018 - CA)

Carlo Llorca v. Sheriff, Lee County, Florida Middle District of Florida Federal Courthouse - Tampa, Florida

Plaintiffs-Appellants, former sheriff deputies in Collier and Lee County, Florida, sued the Collier and Lee County sheriffs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Florida Minimum Wage Act (“FMWA”), Fla. Stat. § 448.110. The deputies claim that the sheriffs violated the overtime provisions in the FLSA and the minimum wage provisions in the FMWA by failin... More...   $0 (07-02-2018 - FL)

Flor Andrea Rodriguez Asalde, et al. v. First Class Parking Systems, LLC, a/k/a 1st Class Valet Services, et al. ALMExperts 212-457-7944

Flor Andrea Rodriguez Asalde worked as a valet for First Class Parking Systems LLC. She and others who also worked as valets brought claims in a putative collective action under the minimum-wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act against FCPS and related parties (whom we refer to collectively as FCPS). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of FCPS, but did so ba... More...   $0 (07-02-2018 - FL)

Anthony E. Simpkins v. DePage Housing Authority Northern District of Illinois Courthouse - Chicago, Illinois Morelaw Internet Marketing National Find A Lawyer Directory 888-354-4529

Anthony Simpkins sued the DuPage
Housing Authority and DHA Management, Inc. (collectively,
DHA), alleging various violations of the Fair Labor Standards
Act (FLSA), the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (IMWL), the
Illinois Employee Classification Act (IECA), the Illinois
2 No. 17‐2685
Prevailing Wage Act (IPWA), and the Family and Medical
Leave Act (FMLA). On cross‐... More...
   $0 (06-27-2018 - IL)

Tamara Skidgel v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

The In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 12300
et seq.) provides in-home services to elderly or disabled persons so that they may avoid
institutionalization. For purposes of the state unemployment insurance system, IHSS
service recipients are considered employers of their service providers if the providers are
directly paid by the program or the recipie... More...
   $0 (06-15-2018 - CA)

Sara Sampra v. United States Department of Transportation Northern District of Illinois Courthouse - Chicago, Illinois

Sara Sampra sued her employer,
the United States Department of Transportation, alleging that
it interfered with her rights under the Family and Medical
Leave Act by reassigning her to a different position after she
returned from childbirth leave. The district court granted
summary judgment for the defendant on the merits, finding
that Sampra was offered essentially the same... More...
   $0 (04-24-2018 - IL)

Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning Western District of Pennsylvania Courthouse - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

This appeal involves a putative class action brought by consumers in four states who alleged that Appellees Owens Corning and Owens Corning Sales, LLC (collectively, Owens Corning) sold defective roof shingles and misrepresented the shingles’ expected useful life. Appellants challenge an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying class certification.... More...   $0 (03-22-2018 - PA)

Roxanne Adams v. Naphcare, Inc., et al. Eastern District of Virginia Federal Courthouse - Norfolk, Virginia

This case arises from the events surrounding the death of Jamycheal Mitchell. His personal representative, Roxanne Adams, brought this action on his behalf, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Debra K. Ferguson and forty-nine other defendants. Ferguson moved to dismiss all claims against her; the district court denied the motion. Ferguson appeals. For the reasons that fol... More...   $0 (03-14-2018 - VA)

Next Page

 
 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2018 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.