False Claims Act Law
 
Kevin Hahn v. Norman Police Department and City of Norman

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Governmental Tort Claim Act auto negligence claims.

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Kevin Hahn, and for his cause of action against the Defendants,
Norman Police Department (herein after "Defendant Police Department") and City of Norman,
alleges and states:
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintifl: Kevin Hahn, was a citize

More...   $100000 (06-23-2025 - OK)

United States of America v. Francis Eversman, Gregg Crawford

East Saint Louis, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with bank fraud


Former bank president and contractor plead guilty to federal charge in loan fraud scheme


More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - IL)

Antonio Lynn Fluker, jr. v. Ally Financial, Inc.

Detroit, Michigan consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory.

Antonio Lynn Fluker, Jr. allegee that Ally Financial called his cell phone hundreds of times, without his consent, while seeking to recover on a car loan debt. He also alleges that these calls were made using both a pre-recorded voice and an automatic telephon

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - OH)

United States of America v. Timothy John Lewis

Louisville, Kentucky criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession of a Firearm by a Prohibited Person.

In March 2023, a jury found Timothy John Lewis guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the Western District of Kentucky. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced him to 200 months’ imprisonment under the Armed Career Criminal Act

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - KY)

Frank Savel and Danielle Crockett v. the Metrohealth System

Cleveland, Ohio employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation theories.

MetroHealth is a county-owned hospital in Cleveland, Ohio. In August 2021, it required
its entire workforce to get vaccinated against COVID-19. At the same time, MetroHealth allowed
employees to request exemptions for medical or religious reasons. MetroHealth received over

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - OH)

United States of America v. Deangelus Thomas

Memphis, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with on two counts of being
a felon in possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for his role in a shooting.


Thomas maintained that he could not be sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Because he had never been indicted for it, and the jury had not found the essenti

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TN)

Dennis Speerly, et al. v. General Motors, LLC

Detroit, Michigan consumer law lawyers represented this plaintiffs who sought to sue on a class action basis on product liability theory.

With the introduction of automatic transmissions in cars, clutch pedals became obsolete for drivers who do not enjoy using a stick shift. General Motors’ Hydra-Matic became the first readily accessible automatic transmission on the market in 1939. It

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - MI)

United States of America v. Christopher Parrish

Amarillo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Failure to Register as a Sex Offender.

The federal law concerning Failure to Register as a Sex Offender, primarily governed by
18 U.S.C. § 2250, focuses on individuals required to register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).

Key Points:


Who is requ

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - )

United States of America v. Montreal Leonard Burnett

Amarillo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.

18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) is a federal law that prohibits individuals convicted of felonies from possessing firearms. Specifically, it makes it unlawful for any person "who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding on

More...   $0 (06-11-2025 - TX)

Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University

Amarillo, Texas employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

* * *

42 U.S.C. 2000e, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. This law applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor unions, making it illegal to discriminate in hi

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

Kasi Sierra v. Collectech Diversified Inc and Equifax Information Services LLC

Lubbock, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law designed to protect consumers from abusive, unfair, and deceptive practices by debt collectors. It outlines what debt collectors can and cannot do when trying to collect debts. The FDCPA aim

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. Darren Carlyle Sadler

Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with raudulently obtaining more than $14 million in small business loans under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.


California Businessman Pleads Guilty in Federal Court to

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - IL)

Kurt Alexander v. Sterlin Proctor, et al.

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation claim.

In the spring of 2021, Plaintiff Kurt Alexander (“Alexander”) worked as a law enforcement officer for Federal Protective Services (“FPS”), an arm of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and lived in private military housing at Joint Base Andrews in Mar

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - MD)

United States of America v. Scott Tucker

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering, wire fraud, money laundering, and Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) offenses.

* * *

Legal issue Can the government obtain clear title to forfeited substitute assets following a criminal conviction and resolution of all third-party claims?
Headnote

CRIMINAL LAW. FORFE

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - NY)

Guadalupe Frias and Shannon McKinnon v. Genaro Hernandez

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a civil rights violation under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Genaro Hernandez is a Dallas Police Department (“DPD”) detective by day and private employee of the Stainback Organization by night. In August 2019, a shooting occurred outside the Stainback Organization’s neighbor, a Dallas bar called The Green Elephant. Detect

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. Miguel Angel Sotelo

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting

Possession with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances: A Summary

Possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance is a serious offense that can carry severe penalties under both federal and state laws. It

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. Ramon Paras Manguera, Jr.

McAllen, Texas criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm not
registered to him in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR), in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d).


6 U.S.C. § 5861:

It shall be unlawful for any person—
(a) to engage in business as a manufacturer or importer of, or dealer in, firearm

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. Aleyda Medrano-Ramos

El Paso, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to transport aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324 outlines the federal crime of "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens." It addresses the illegal entry and presence of unauthorized aliens in the United States, making it a crime to bring them in, transport them, conceal them, or encourage their entry in violati

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

Tammy L. Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center

Moorefield, West Virginia employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

e petitioner is the deputy director of the Office of Emergency Management/Hardy County 911 Center (Center). As deputy director, the petitioner is an administratively exempt, salaried county employee. She assists and reports to her supervisor, the director of the Cente

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - WV)

Charleston, West Virginia employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a breach of contract theory.

Luna’s relationship with Gryphon was documented in an Independent Contractor Agreement between The Texan and Gryphon. The Agreement explained in its opening paragraph that it was “entered into . . . between GryphonESP, LLC (the ‘Company’) and The Texan LLC (‘Contractor’).

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - WV)

Joel Aaron Burrell v. S. Shirley, Correctional Officer, et al.

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights claim.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, federal courts may permit an indigent prisoner to proceed without prepaying filing fees or giving security. The legal term for proceeding this way is in forma pauperis. But Congress expressed concern that prisoners were filing many “frivolous lawsuits floodin

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - VA)

Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence case.

At a CVS Pharmacy in 2017, Amanda Watts was given two shots, one with the Pneumovax 23 vaccine and one with the Boostrix vaccine. According to Watts, both vaccines were negligently administered, in the same improper location in her arm. Watts was eventually diagnosed with a chronic pain condition th

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - MD)

Joy Francine Mitchell Byrd v. Samuel Byrd, Jr.

Knoxville, Tennessee family law lawyer represented the Defendant in a divorce action.

* * *

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. FINAL JUDGMENT REQUIREMENT. The case addresses whether the appellant could pursue an appeal in the absence of a final judgment from the trial court, which is a prerequisite for an appeal as of right according to court rules.

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. JURISDICTION.

More...   $0 (07-01-2025 - TN)

Lashaunna Jemison v. Social Security Administration

Buffalo, New York disability lawyers represented the Petitioner seeking review of the denial of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW disability by HHS.

In Social Security law, DIWC (Disabled Individual, Worker or Child) refers to disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, specifically for disabled workers and eligible children. DIWW (Disabled Widow/Widower Bene

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - ny)

Caprecia Lowmack v. Social Security Administration

Buffalo, New York disability lawyer represented the Petitioner seeking review of the denial by HHS of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW benefits.

* * *

In Social Security law, DIWC (Disabled Individual, Worker or Child) refers to disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, specifically for disabled workers and eligible children. DIWW (Disabled Widow/

More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - NY)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher