Jackson, MS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of more than two but less than ten grams of methamphetamine

Jackson, MS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, aggravated identity theft
Four Defendants Sentenced in Federal Court for Roles in Automobile Dealership Fraud Conspiracy

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Aiding and Abetting Fraudulent Transactions
Texas Company Guilty of Aiding and Abetting Fraudulent Transactions Related to False Ethanol Sales, Pays Over $15,000,000 in Fines, Restitution

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with using or possessing fraudulent immigration docuemtns in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1546, which provides:

he first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) proscribes the forging, counterfeiting, altering or falsely making of certain immigration documents or their use, possession, or receipt. The second paragraph pros

Great Falls, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence wrongful death claim.


In Montana, a wrongful death lawsuit in a car accident case can be filed by the deceased's personal representative if the death was caused by another's negligence or wrongful act. This civil action seeks compensation for the surviving family members' losses, such as loss

Great Falls, Montana insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a bad faith breach of contract claim.

In Montana, insurance bad faith occurs when an insurance company fails to uphold its contractual obligations and deal fairly with its policyholders. This includes actions like wrongly denying claims, unreasonably delaying payments, failing to investigate properly, or offering lowba

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute meth.

21 U.S.C. 841 provides:

(a) Unlawful actsExcept as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally—
(1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or disp

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. § 1343, the federal wire fraud statute, defines and criminalizes the use of interstate or foreign wire communications to execute a scheme intended to defraud someone of money or property. Essentially, it's a form of fraud that leverages electronic communication for deceptive purposes

Billings, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm.

18 U.S.C. 922(g):

Federal law prohibits felons from possessing firearms. Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) makes it illegal for anyone convicted of a felony (or a crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment) to ship, transport, posse

Billings, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. 1343 provides:

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or televisi

Billings, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charge with failure to register as sex offender.

18 U.S. Code § 2250 - Failure to register:

(a) In General.—Whoever—
(1) is required to register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act;
(2)
(A) is a sex offender as defined for the purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Not

Tulsa, Oklahoma, cr`iminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

ARSON - FIRST DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S. 1401A;
ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE DURING ARSON, in violation of 21 O.S. 1405; and
FALSE CLAIM FOR INSURANCE, in violation of 21 O.S. 1662.

MoreLaw was created 30 years ago to help people find lawyers to represent them.

Click the link above

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with one count of fraud or misuse of an immigration document. The two defend
Western District of Texas U.S. Attorney’s Office Adds 222 Immigration Cases

Tulsa, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of his application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI by HHS.

Title XVI of the Social Security Act, known as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), provides financial assistance to individuals who are aged, blind, or disabled and have limited income and resources. This federal program is

Tulsa, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial by JJS of his application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI benefits.

* * *

Title XVI of the Social Security Act, known as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), provides financial assistance to individuals who are aged, blind, or disabled and have limited income and resources

Tulsa, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial by HHS for her application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI benefits.

Title XVI of the Social Security Act, known as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), provides financial assistance to individuals who are aged, blind, or disabled and have limited income and resources. This federal p

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant who was charged with unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326, which provides:

§1326 . Reentry of deported alien; criminal penalties for reentry of certain deported aliens

(a) Subject to subsection (b) of this section, any alien who-

(1) has been arrested and deported or excluded

Olathe, Kansas personal injury lawyers reprsented the Plaintiff on a sexual abuse case.

In August 2021, A.S. filed a petition for damages and alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by Robert Bloom, her former youth pastor at Vineyard Church of Overland Park (VCOP). In addition to Bloom, A.S. named VCOP, Vineyard USA (VUSA), and Mark Warner as defendants in her claims of negligen

Mobile, Alabama criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with intentional murder, a violation of § 13A-6-2(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975, attempted murder, a violation of §§ 13A-4-2 and 13A-6-2, Ala. Code 1975 , attempted first- degree assault,[1] a violation of §§ 13A-4-2 and 13A-6-20, Ala. Code 1975, and discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, a violation of § 13A-11-61, A

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine on a vessel subject to United States jurisdiction and possession with intent to distribute cocaine on a vessel subject to United States jurisdiction.

Matos-Montas challenged the district court’s jurisdiction over the case, arguing that: (1) the governmen

Mobile, Alabama criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with knowing possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

The Court of Appeals was unpersuaded by Pettway’s claim that the district court abused its discretion in admitting at trial evidence of an alleged attempted robbery. In general, we recognize three tiers of admissible

Decatur, Georgia employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a gender discrmination theory under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1983 and under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Without direct evidence of discrimination, a plaintiff canprove a sex discrimination claim under Title VII through circumstantial evidence, which we generally analyze using the three

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a First Amendment violation theory.

John Labriola was a media aide for the Miami-Dade Board
of County Commissioners. Labriola v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 693 F.
Supp. 3d 1284, 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2023). In his own name and on his
own time, Labriola wrote an opinion piece that criticized the
Equality Act, an as-y

Orlando, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 use of unreasonable force in violation of the Fourth Amendment theory.

On the evening of April 26, 2016, Heid, his wife, and their
roommate were drinking alcohol at their home. Heid’s daughter
and stepson were also at the home. Around 9:00 PM, Heid and his
wife go

Cordell, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Lewd or Indecent Acts to a Child Under Sixteen, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2018, § 1123.

2023 OK CR 1, 526 P.3d 46:

¶4 The challenged evidence here met all of the factors required for admissibility under 12 O.S.2011, § 2414. In Horn v. State, 2009 OK CR 7, ¶ 40, 204 P.3d 777, 786, we required