United States of America v. Joshua Roberts, et al.
Atlanta, Georgia criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with fraud.
More than three dozen individuals have been sentenced for their involvement in a large-scale fraud and money laundering operation that targeted individuals, corporations, and financial institutions throughout the United States. The defendants used business email compromise schemes, romance fraud scams, an
Timothy Bodwin v. Humana Wisconsin Health Organization Insurance Corporation
Green Bay, Wisconsin insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants for failing and refusing to pay E.R.I.S.A. Employment retirement benefits.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these
Amanda Perkins v. United Surgical Partners International, Inc., et al.
Dallas, Texas employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) entitlement theory.
This was a putative class action suit for breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The plaintiffs are five former employees of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (United Surg
Roberta Stepp Garrison v. The Administrative Committee of Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Denver, Colorado employment benefits law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) violation theory.
Louisville, Kentucky insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking employee benefits in accordance with E.R.I.S.A. for the Estate of Phillip Malone.
Timothy R. Geyer v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Knoxville, Tennessee insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on E.R.I.S.A.: Employment Retirement theory claiming that Defendant wrongfully failed to pay benefits to which Plaintiff was entitled.
More... $1 (02-03-2023 - TN)
Lorna Shields v. United of Omaha Insurance Company
Portland, Oregon insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a violation of E.R.I.S.A. employment retirement theory.
Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (hereinafter, "United") is licensed to conduct the business of insurance in the State of Maine. Prior to 2008, United issued a basic Group Term Life policy as well as a voluntary Group Term Life policy to
Carol H. Stewart v. Harford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Birmingham, Alabama insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory.
Carol Stewart sued to obtain two insurance benefits that she
believes Hartford Insurance Company owes her: (1) long-term dis-
ability payments and (2) a waiver of life-insurance premiums. Alt-
hough it concedes that Stewart was covered by its policy, Hartford
Walter Dean and Dean Wollenzien v. National Production Workers Union Severance Trust Plan, et al.
Chicago, Illinois labor lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) violation theories.
Walter Dean and Dean Wollenzien sued their former pension plans, the plans'
trustees, and the plans' administrator for various claims un-
der the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974—
more commonly known as
Virgil Harris v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, et al.
Atlanta, Georgia insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on E.R.I.S.A. law theories.
Under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, 29
U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), a plan administrator's benefits decision is
subject to plenary review in federal court unless the administrator
is given discretion to determine eligibility or construe the terms of
t
Renee Ministeri v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Boston, Massachusetts insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory.
It is common ground that
ambiguities in an insurance policy — particularly ambiguities in
an insurance policy issued as part of an employee benefit plan
and, thus, within the protective carapace of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act
Phoenix, Arizona employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant E.R.I.S.A. employment retirement law theory.
Sobh was an employee of Defendant Phoenix Graphix Inc. for more than ten years. While in that job, Sobh participated in a Profit Sharing Plan ("Planâ€). In 2018, Sobh left his job and began seeking distribution of his Plan benefits in the form of a "hard
Mary K. Boley v. University Health Services, Inc., et al.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISAâ€) breach of fiduciary duty class action theory.
Universal Health Services, Inc. sponsors the Universal
Health Services, Inc., Retirement Savings Plan (the "Planâ€), a
defined contribution retirement plan,2 in which qualified
Corey Skelton v. Radisson Hotel Bloomington, et al.
Minneapolis, Minnesota employment laws represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. theories.
Corey Skelton was married to Beth M. Skelton ("Skeltonâ€), a corporate group
sales manager at Davidson Hotels LLC.
Davidson operated a welfare benefits plan ("Planâ€) that provided dental,<
Atlanta, Georgia civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach.
"SIS spent two years preparing and convincing APi that it was the right company to lead the project," said Davis. "Stoneridge stole the client by using information gained under a
Ruth Mae Chelf v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Louisville, Kentucky insurance lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty theory.
Elmer Chelf, a former employee of Wal-Mart, was
on long-term disability leave when he passed away. His widow, Ruth Mae Chelf, was denied
benefits under his work-based optional term life insurance policy. She brought claims against
Wal-Mart and the Plan Administ
More... $1 (02-03-2023 - TN)