Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Software, Inc.

Date: 07-08-2021

Case Number: 1:17-cv-01816-SDG

Judge: Steven D. Grimberg

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Fulton County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Amy David, Amy M. Steward, and Steven Rosen

Defendant's Attorney: Barton Carl Gernander and Scott Lester Bonder

Description:
Atlanta, Georgia civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach.



"SIS spent two years preparing and convincing APi that it was the right company to lead the project," said Davis. "Stoneridge stole the client by using information gained under a confidentiality agreement with SIS, circumventing them to engage directly with APi."



Davis and Stewart used technology and a cohesive, compelling trial theme to build the case for SIS. "There's no question the defendants acted in secret to deceive and double-cross SIS," said Stewart. "Stoneridge knew their skills were critical to the success of the project and waited for the project to start before engaging directly with APi. The trail of emails from Stonebridge tells the whole story."



"We could not be more proud of the case put on by our trial team," said SIS Partner Mark Kershteyn. "Amy Davis and Amy Stewart were always the most polished and prepared lawyers in the courtroom. They were in their element."



Amy E. Davis is a principal at Christiansen Davis, LLC, with broad trial experience, from securities litigation, defending and prosecuting securities fraud, non-compete and trade secret cases, to high-profile product liability cases.



Amy M. Stewart is a partner at Stewart Law Group, with experience representing Fortune 100 companies to startups in contract disputes, business torts, investigations, product liability, ERISA, employment and labor matters.



"Amy Stewart and I are both daughters of Marines, and we made a great team." said Davis. "We have different, but equally effective styles that, together, are unstoppable. We presented a great case, and achieved an excellent result."
Outcome:
Stoneridge made $14 million in revenue, and $5.6 million in profit, representing the largest software implementation project of its kind in the construction industry. SIS holds that they are owed $5.6 million. The court will decide attorney fees, expenses and costs.



11/16/2021 Funds Deposited per Order: $ 83,299.32, receipt number GAN100134302 (jkb) (Entered: 11/16/2021)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Software, Inc.?

The outcome was: Stoneridge made $14 million in revenue, and $5.6 million in profit, representing the largest software implementation project of its kind in the construction industry. SIS holds that they are owed $5.6 million. The court will decide attorney fees, expenses and costs. 11/16/2021 Funds Deposited per Order: $ 83,299.32, receipt number GAN100134302 (jkb) (Entered: 11/16/2021)

Which court heard SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Software, Inc.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Fulton County), GA. The presiding judge was Steven D. Grimberg.

Who were the attorneys in SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Software, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Amy David, Amy M. Steward, and Steven Rosen. Defendant's attorney: Barton Carl Gernander and Scott Lester Bonder.

When was SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Software, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on July 8, 2021.