Rose Anwar v. DOW Chemical Company, Meglobal International PZE; Ramesh Ramachandran Western District of Michigan Federal Courthouse - Grand Rapids, Michigan |
Rose Anwar appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims and argues that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and a motion for summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees MEG |
Katheryn Swenson v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals - New Orleans, Louisiana |
Katheryn Swenson filed suit in Louisiana state court seeking benefits from a life insurance policy after her husband passed away. The insurance company refused to pay based on its belief that Swenson’s husband was not a covered employee at the time of his death. In seeking to recover the death benefits, Swenson cited Louisiana statutes imposing certain requirements on group life policies concernin... More... $0 (12-05-2017 - LA) |
Paul F. Sikora v. UPMC Third Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
A so-called “top-hat” plan is “a plan which is |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CALEB GRAY-BURRISS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
Defendant Caleb Gray-Burriss founded the National Association of Special Police and |
Patricia Arellano v. Clark County Collection Service, LLC; Borg Law Group, LLC Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse - San Francisco, California |
Can a debt collector avoid liability under the Federal Fair |
James J. Thole v. U.S. Bank National Association Eighth Circuit Courthouse - St. Louis, Missouri |
Named plaintiffs James Thole and Sherry Smith (collectively, “plaintiffs”)1 |
Robert Ramirez v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals - New Orleans, Louisiana |
Robert Ramirez traveled to West Texas and contracted a fungal infection |
Randall Silver v. Christine Annette Slusher |
¶1 The dispositive issue is whether the terms of 36 O.S. 1981 § 3636 1 impose an affirmative duty upon insurers to provide an explanation of uninsured motorist coverage [UMC] to the named insureds as an indispensable precondition for a statutorily effective rejection. We answer in the negative. |
David Bruce McDermott v. Sentry Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Steven A. Marzett |
¶1 We review this matter on reassignment from the Oklahoma Supreme Court pursuant to its order of April 12, 1999, vacating our opinion issued June 9, 1998, and directing us to reconsider this cause based upon the full trial court record and additional briefs submitted since the date of our opinion. Based on reconsideration of the record, the parties' briefs, the amicus brief submitted by the Unite... More... $0 (01-24-2001 - OK) |
DRK Photo v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - San Francisco, California |
This appeal raises the now often litigated issue of whether a stock photography agency—here, the Arizona-based agency DRK Photo (“DRK”)—has standing under the Copyright Act of 1976 to pursue infringement claims involving photographs from its collection. Ultimately, there is no bright line answer to this question. Here, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, McGraw-Hill Glo... More... $0 (09-16-2017 - AZ) |
Gary King v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - San Francisco, California |
Linda King participated in a welfare benefit plan that the |
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservations v. Honorable Barry G. Lawrence |
This appeal arises from a contract dispute between Lynn Becker and the Ute |
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund and Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Fund v. Coleridge Fine Arts; Jelnike Limited |
Plaintiffs GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund and the Board of Trustees of |
Joel Thomason v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Verizon Employee Benefits Committee |
This case arises from a dispute between a claims administrator and a |
Jessee Soloman v. Bert Bell, et al. |
This appeal raises the issue of whether the plan administrator for Defendants- |
Salvatore Arnone v. Aetna Life Insurance Company |
Section 5‐335 of the New York General Obligations Law provides that personal |
Karen Vanover v. NCO Financial Services, Inc. |
Plaintiff-Appellant Karen Vanover (“Vanover”) sued Defendant-Appellee NCO Financial Systems, Inc. (“NCO”), on April 23, 2014, for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, after NCO attempted to collect medical debts from her. See Vanover v. NCO Fin. Sys., Inc., Case No. 8:14-cv-964-T-35EAJ (M.D. Fla. 2014) (hereinafter “Vanover I”). Nearly one year after Vanov... More... $0 (05-18-2017 - ) |
McCulloch Orthopaedic Surgical Services, LLC, a/k/a Dr. Kenneth E. McCulloch v. Aetna, Inc. d/b/a Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al. |
19 We consider in this case whether the Employee Retirement |
James R. Rodgers v. Healthcare Solutions Group, Inc. and Tulsa Firefighters Health & Welfare Trust Tulsa County Oklahoma Courthouse |
|
United States of America v. Alan Weissman |
San Francisco, CA - Southern California Man Pleads Guilty To Bank Fraud, Embezzlement, And Making False Statements In Connection With Position As Trustee For Pension Plans |
Frederick Capps v. Mondelez Global, LLC |
Frederick Capps challenges the District Court’s Order |
United States of America v. Emily R. Strunk |
Denver, CO - Parker Businesswoman Pleads Guilty to Embezzling from Employee Benefit Plans |
ANCHOR TANK LINES, LLC and NEW YORK OIL HEATING INSURANCE FUND v. UNITED STATES |
Old Anchor, formerly known as Mystic Tank Lines Corporation, was an oil transportation company incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Astoria, New York. Pls.’ Opp’n to Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss (“Pls.’ Opp’n”) Ex. 4 (Indictment, United States v. Baldari, No. 1Three separate actions are pending in this court based on these suits in the district ... More... $0 (07-16-2016 - DC) |
In Re: Trump Entertainment Resorts |
The facts giving rise to this appeal are undisputed. The Debtors own and operate the Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The casino employs 2,953 employees, 1,467 of whom are unionized. UNITE HERE Local 54 is the largest of the employee unions, representing 1,136 employees. The most recent CBA between the Union and Taj Mahal was negotiated in 2011 for a three-year term. It co... More... $0 (04-03-2016 - DE) |
Robin Feeko v. Pfizer Inc |
Appellants Robin Feeko, Nelida Marengo, and Janet Rodgers brought claims for |
Next Page |