In May 1993, three boys were murdered in West Memphis, Arkansas. Three men, subsequently knows as the “West Memphis Three,” were ultimately convicted of the murders and sentenced to death or life in prison. Yet, after lengthy post-conviction proceedings, all were released from prison in 2011. The only one of the three initially sentenced to death was Damien Echols, who was represented in the

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants who were sued on eminent domain law theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by Defendants for street right-0f-way.

The commissioners appoint by the Court awarded Defendants $95,000.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented Defendant sued by Plaintiff on an eminent domain theory seeking to obtain some right, title and interest in real property owned by Defendant for public use and convenience.

Matt Mardis, George O'Connor and Max Tankersley were appointed commissioners to assess the compensation due to Defendant as a result of the taking in the amount of $403,8

Akron, Ohio criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with his role in an international criminal network engaged in a wide-ranging online auction fraud scheme that targeted victims in the Northern District of Ohio and elsewhere in the United States.

From July 2008 through August 2020, Costel Alecu, age 38, of Bucharest, Rominia and codefendant Madalin Ghinea, 35, of Alexandria, Roman

New York City, New York criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with bank fraud and money laundering.

Natalia Korzha and Vladislav Neceaev conspired to commit bank fraud in connection with a scheme to launder money derived from an online vehicle sale scam that generated at least $5.3 million from dozens of defrauded consumers.

U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said: “Natali

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on medical malpractice theories.


Following a knee replacement in 2019, Wendy Jenkins developed an infection and ultimately lost her leg after several follow-up procedures. Wendy and her husband Richard sued a number of doctors and entities they claim negligently caused or contributed to the loss of

Tulsa, Oklahoma real property lawyers represented Defendants sued by the City of Tulsa on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendants for public use on Union Avenue.

GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS; MARK SWINEY APPEARS FOR PLAINTIFF; MICHAEL PACEWIZ APPEARS FOR DEFENDANTS

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

Plaintiff is a wildlife illustrator who created and owns copyrights to numerous works of art. Dkt. No. 2 at 2-4, Dkt No. 2-1. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Jane Doe and Does 1-10 (“Doe Defendants”) have unlawfully reproduced, adapted, displayed, and used some

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Defendants, who were sued by Plaintiff on an eminent domain theory seeking condemn certain rights, title and interest in real property for use as a public highway.

Commissioner appointed by the Court assessed Defendants' damages at $2,679,000.00.

Cleveland, Ohio civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.


The Ohio Soldiers' and Sailors' Orphans' Home/Ohio Veterans' Children's Home (hereinafter the “OSSO/OVCH Home” or “Home”) was a children's home located in Xenia, Ohio.

(Id. at ¶ 10.) The OSSO/OVCH Home officially closed its doors to incoming students

Having read and considered the parties' Stipulation for Protective Order, and also considering the Court's finding in its April 20, 2022 order that a protective order is warranted in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' request for a Protective Order, the terms of which shall be as follows:

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery

Riverside, California condemnation lawyer represented Defendant sued by Plaintiff on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire 200.37 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in San Bernardino County, California.