| State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Richard L. Frazier, Kimberly Frazier, Farm Credit of Central Oklahoma, FLCA, Comanche Board of County Commissioners |
|
Lawton, OK - The State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Richard L. Frazier, Kimberly Frazier, Farm Credit of Central Oklahoma, FLCA, Comanche Board of County Commissioners on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property for public use. |
| Microsoft Corporation v. United States of America |
|
Microsoft Corporation appeals from orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying its motion to quash a warrant (“Warrant”) issued under § 2703 of the Stored Communications Act (“SCA” or the “Act”), 18 U.S.C. |
| United States of America v. Andrew Caspersen |
|
New York, NY - Fraudster Pleads Guilty In Scheme to Defraud Investors |
| STEPHANIE GRAY & others1 vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL & another |
|
The common core standards were developed |
| Antonio Oliver v. Philip Morris USA Inc. |
|
Appellant and relator Anthony Oliver brings this qui tam action alleging that Appellee Philip Morris USA violated the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (2006),1 by charging the Navy Exchange Service Command (“NEXCOM”) and the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (“AAFES”) prices for cigarettes that violated the terms of their contracts. The District Court concluded tha $0 (06-22-2016 - DC) |
| City of Tulsa v. US Acquition Property XIII LLC f/k/a TCI Eton Square, L.P., et al. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The City of Tulsa sued US Acquition Property XIII LLC f/k/a TCI Eton Square, L.P., et al. on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the defendants for public use for the 61st and Memorial intersection project. |
| City of Tulsa v. US Acquition Property XIII LLC f/k/a TCI Eton Square, L.P., et al. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The City of Tulsa sued US Acquition Property XIII LLC f/k/a TCI Eton Square, L.P., et al. on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the defendants for public use for the 61st and Memorial intersection project. |
| City of Tulsa, Oklahoma v. One Gas, Inc. and Oklahoma Natural Gas Company |
|
Tulsa, OK - The City of Tulsa sued One Gas, Inc., Oklahoma Natural Gas Company and others on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the Defendants for public use to improve the intersection of 36th Street North and Lewis Avenue. |
| City of Tulsa, Oklahoma v. MBros, L.L.C., et al. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The City of Tulsa sued Midwest Salvage, Inc. and MBros, LLC on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the Defendants for public use to construct the North Lewis, 36th to 46th Street Project in Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Tulsa, Interests, LLC, RCB Bank, El Chico Restaurants, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Tulsa, Interests, LLC, RCB Bank, El Chico Restaurants, Inc. on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interested in real property in which the Defendants held some interested to the improvement of Interstates Highway I-44 in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. |
| United States v. Ganias |
|
In August 2003, agents of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Fikes Center, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Fikes Center, Inc. and Bank of America on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned or upon which the defendants had ownership or lien interests for public use in the construction and operation of certain improvements to Interstate Highway 44 in T $2395500 (03-29-2016 - OK) |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. H.W. Allen Co., L.L.C. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued H.W. Allen Co., L.L.C. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights title and interests in real property owned by the Defendant for public use (I-44) in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Berry Joy Roland Young and Betty Rowland Nursery School |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Berry Joy Roland Young and Betty Rowland Nursery School on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interested owned by the Defendants in real property located in Tulsa County, Oklahoma for use for a public highway. |
| STATE OF LOUISIANA V. CHRISTOPHER J. WELLS |
|
Christopher Wells shot and killed Brandon ―Big Herb‖ McCue. Charged |
| United States of America v. Benjamin Earnest Nichols |
|
Dallas, TX - Oklahoma City Man Faces 10 Years in Federal Prison After Admitting He Transmitted Program or Code to a Protected Computer |
| State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds, et al. |
|
All of the defendants were indicted for attempted first degree murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony. A jury convicted them of attempted second degree murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony; they were acquitted $0 (04-07-2016 - TN) |
| Pervis Tyrone Payne v. State of Tennessee |
|
This matter began in 1987 when the Petitioner stabbed to death Charisse Christopher and her minor daughter, Lacie. He also stabbed Ms. Christopher‟s minor son, Nicholas. In 1988, a jury convicted the Petitioner of two counts of first degree murder and one count of assault with intent to commit first degree murder. The jury imposed a death sentence for each of the two murders, and the tria $0 (04-07-2016 - TN) |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Fikes Center, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, OK - State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Fikes Center, Inc. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by the Defendant for improvements in Interstate Highway I-44. |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. H.W. Allen Co., L.L.C. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued H.W. Allen Co., L.L.C. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the Defendant for public purposes. |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Betty Joy Rowland Young, Betty Rowland Nursery School, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Betty Joy Rowland Young and Betty Rowland Nursery School, Inc. on eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property for use for a public improvement. |
| Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co. v. United States |
|
The matter concerns the fourth administrative review of the order on subject |
| Kate Calvin, et al. v. Jefferson County Board of Commissioners, et al. |
|
Imagine a fictional Florida county—I’ll call it Marshall County—with a total census population of 12,000. Marshall County is run by a board of commissioners comprised of five peo-ple, each of whom is elected from a single-member district with a total census population of exactly 2,400. The Marshall County School Board, which also has five members, uses the same district lines. Case 4:15-cv-0 $0 (03-24-2016 - FL) |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transporation v. Tulsa Interests, LLC, RBC Bank, El Chico Restaurants |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transporation sued Tulsa Interests, LLC, RBC Bank, El Chico Restaurants on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real owned by the Defendants for public purposes. The allegations made by the State are not available for this case. |
| STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. YASIN SIMMS |
|
In State v. Cain, __ N.J. __ (2016), we determined that in |
|
Next Page |