Amarin Pharma Inc. v. U.S. FDA |
Amarin is a biopharmaceutical company incorporated in Delaware and based in New |
Hanover 3201 Realty LLC v. Village Supermarkets |
Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC (“Hanover Realty”) signed a contract with Wegmans to develop a supermarket on its property in Hanover, New Jersey. The agreement required Hanover Realty to secure all necessary governmental permits and approvals prior to breaking ground. Village Supermarkets, Inc. (“ShopRite”) owns the local ShopRite. Once ShopRite and its subsidiary Hanover and Horsehill Development L... More... $0 (11-13-2015 - NJ) |
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. |
This copyright dispute tests the boundaries of fair use. Plaintiffs, who are authors of |
Atterbury v. U.S. Marshals Service |
Because Atterbury appeals from the grant of a motion to dismiss under |
Revolution Retail Systems, LLC v. Sentinel Technologies, Inc. |
In 2011, Vector proposed a term sheet to acquire Tidel and its subsidiary, |
State Of Nebraska v. Ware |
On April 13, 1984, Ware was convicted of first degree murder following a bench trial. Ware was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment. This court affirmed his conviction and sentence.1 On August 16, 2012, Ware filed a motion for postconviction relief. In that motion, Ware alleged that (1) his mandatory life sentence was unconstitutional under Miller v. Alabama2 because the sentencing court di... More... $0 (10-31-2015 - NE) |
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. |
This copyright dispute tests the boundaries of fair use. Plaintiffs, who are authors of 27 |
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. v. Cuomo, et al. |
Legislation enacted by the New York and Connecticut legislatures in 4 the wake of the 2012 mass murders at Sandy Hook Elementary 5 School in Newtown, Connecticut. The New York and Connecticut 6 laws at issue prohibit the possession of certain semiautomatic 7 “assault weapons” and large‐capacity magazines. Following the 8 entry of summary judgment in favor of... More... $0 (10-19-2015 - NY) |
Microsoft Corporation v. Patent Revue Partners, et al. |
Plaintiff, Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), is a Washington corporation with |
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple, Inc. |
Madison, WI - Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation awarded $234 million against Apple for patent infringement |
Sprengel v. Zbylut |
In 2008, Jean Sprengel, a licensed anesthesiologist, wrote and published a guidebook for treating the side effects of chemotherapy. In March of 2008, Lanette Mohr and Sprengel agreed to form a business to market the guidebook. They retained Kenneth Stream to assist them in forming “Purposeful Press,” a limited liability corporation that would develop and distribute Sprengel’s work. Stream prepa... More... $0 (10-14-2015 - CA) |
Bikram's Yoga College of India, LP v. Evolation Yoga, LLC |
Court decides whether a sequence of twenty-six yoga poses and two breathing exercises developed by Bikram Choudhury and described in his 1979 book, Bikram’s Beginning Yoga Class, is entitled to copyright protection. |
David Herr v. U.S. Forest Service |
David and Pamela Herr bought waterfront property on Crooked Lake in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and planned to use their gas-powered motorboat on it. That plan was dashed when the U.S. Forest Service threatened to enforce a regulation that bans non-electric motorboats from the ninety-five percent of the lake that falls within a National Wilderness Area. The Herrs responded with this lawsuit,... More... $0 (10-11-2015 - MI) |
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Jenner & Block LLP |
On August 27, 2015, we withdrew our opinion and vacated our judgment in this case. |
Lucent Technologies v. State Bd. Equalization |
The telephone and data network in the United States is both terrestrial (land-based) and wireless, and is seamlessly interconnected through equipment called switches that are housed in so-called central offices scattered around the country. A single switch is comprised of “numerous computer processors, frames (sometimes called cabinets), shelves, drawers, circuit packs, cables, trunks and many ot... More... $0 (10-09-2015 - CA) |
Gloria Coots Baldwin v. EMI Feist Catalog, Inc. |
19 This appeal involves a dispute over the copyright in the musical |
DC Comics v. MARK TOWLE, an individual, DBA Garage Gotham |
SUMMARY** |
Eitan Konstantino v. AngioScore, Inc., et al. |
Plaintiff Dr. Eitan Konstantino was one of the founders of Angioscore. |
Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, aka, The NCAA |
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, 15 U.S.C. |
Jean Best v. Brianna Best |
This case concerns a dispute regarding who is entitled to the proceeds of a retirement annuity contract. Kevin Best, the father of Brianna Best and ex-husband of Jean Best,1 made contributions to employer-sponsored retirement accounts administered by the Variable Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“VALIC”). Approximately three years after Kevin executed the beneficiary designation on his retir... More... $0 (09-30-2015 - WY) |
In re the Detention of Anthony Rushton |
In 1989, at age fifteen, Anthony Rushton molested twin nine-year-old boys. As a |
Knife Rights, Inc. v. Vance |
Under New York law, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth |
Gricius et al v. Cox |
This matter is before the court on a petition for extraordinary relief filed by Stephanie Gricius, Kamme Edsberg, Melissa Bradley, and Colby Curtis. Previously, a similar petition was filed by Fred C. Cox,1 but we determined he lacked standing because he had not identified himself as one of the prospective sponsors of the proposed referendum petition described by his petition. ¶2 This petition ha... More... $0 (09-26-2015 - UT) |
Knife Rights, Inc. v. Cyrus Vance, Jr. |
In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiffs John |
American Tradition Inst. v. Rector and Visitors |
In this appeal, we consider whether the Circuit Court of Prince William County ("trial court") erred by denying a request for disclosure of certain documents under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act ("VFOIA"), Code § 2.2-3700 et seq., and whether a public body may impose charges for the cost of reviewing documents under the statutory exclusion. |
Next Page |