Copyright infringement Law
 
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe

Akron, Ohio intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on 17 U.S.C. 101 a copyright infringement theory.

Strike 3 Holdings LLC is a company that produces pornographic films. Their adult films are published under the subscription sites, such as Slayed.

Copyright is a legal right that protects original works of authorship. This includes literary

More...   $0 (11-27-2023 - OH)

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roosters Cocktails, Inc.

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 101.

?Get the best live sports and entertainment for your bar and restaurants today. Broadcast sports and entertainment content from Joe Hand Promotions."

"Copyright infringement law is a complex area of law that protects original works

More...   $1 (11-13-2023 - OK)

Reed Timmer v. Medialinks TV, LLC

Washington, DC intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright violation theory under 17 U.S.C. 501.

CGTN America works in tandem with other CGTN news bureaus located in Nairobi and Beijing. This material is distributed by MediaLinks TV, LLC

"17 U.S.C. § 501, titled "Infringement of copyright," is a section of the United States Copyri

More...   $1 (11-22-2023 - DC)

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe

Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copy right infringement theory.

Strike 3 Holdings is a company that owns the copyright on some pornographic films. They produce adult films under the brand names Slayed,...

"Copyright infringement law is a body of law that protects the original works of authors, including lite

More...   $0 (11-13-2023 - MD)

Allan Tannenbaum v. CityRealty.com, LLC

New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyrights infringement law.

"Copyright infringement law is a body of law that protects the original works of authors, including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, as well as motion pictures, sound recordings, and architectural works. Copyright infringement occurs when a co

More...   $0 (11-09-2023 - Ny)

Christopher Sadowski v. Romanian-American Network, Inc.

Chicago, Illinois intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement law is the body of law that protects the exclusive rights of copyright holders. Copyright holders have the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, and create derivative works of their copyrighted works.

Cop

More...   $0 (10-26-2023 - IL)

Gregory P. Mango v. The Blark Wall Street Times, Inc.

Tulsa, Oklahoma copyright lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

Gregory Mango writes for the See: New York Post

More...   $1 (10-11-2023 - OK)

Gregory P. Mango v. Newsmax Media, Inc.

West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

Gregory P. Mango is a journalist who works for the New York Post.

"Copyright law is a body of law that protects the original works of authorship, including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works. Copyright law gives the copyright hold

More...   $0 (10-10-2023 - FL)

Michael Stokes v. Gold Productions, Inc., d/b/a Girls Night Out The Show

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 501.

"Copyright infringement law is the body of law that protects the original works of authorship, including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, such as books, movies, songs, and paintings. Copyright law gives the copyright

More...   $0 (09-29-2023 - OK)

Evofem Biosciences, Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Newark, New Jersey intellectual property litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendants on patent infringement theories.

More...   $1 (09-22-2023 - NJ)

DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie"

Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

DP Creations is a retain apparel and fashion company located in Bountiful, Utah.

Denise Pratt sculpted life-like newborn dolls as a hobby. Eventually her creations became so popular that Ms. Pratt and her husband, Nevin, organized DP Creations LLC (DPC)

More...   $0 (08-18-2023 - UT)

Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc.

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This can include things like copying, distributing, or performing copyrighted works without permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright infringement is a violation of the copy

More...   $0 (08-08-2023 - NY)

Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman

New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This can include things like copying, distributing, or performing copyrighted works without permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright infringement is a violation of the copyright

More...   $0 (08-08-2023 - NY)

James Messerschmidt v. EE Bar, LLC

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff that sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

More...   $0 (08-04-2023 - NY)

Dawn Cutillo, et al. v. David Cutillo, et al.

Allentown, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories.


Plaintiffs Dawn Cutillo and Infinity Health, LLC (“IH”) have alleged federal and state law claims against Defendants David Cutillo, Infinity Health Advisors LLC, (“IHA”), and intervenor IHA Distribution, LLC (“IHAD”). Plaintiffs' claims aris

More...   $0 (07-28-2023 - PA)

Laurie Rubin v. Trendland, L.L.C.

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides:

(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the Unit

More...   $0 (07-21-2023 - NY)

John Kraljevich v. Courser Athletics, Inc.

Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories.

The Complaint alleges that defendants Courser Athletics, Inc., Michael Petry, Gregg Spiro and Laurie Spiro are “willfully infringing Mr. Kraljevich's copyrighted works by manufacturing, importing, distributing and selling high-priced athletic sneakers that co

More...   $0 (07-21-2023 - MA)

Veranique Payton and Felton Payton, Jr. v. National Continental Insurance Company

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant in an auto insurance liability theory.

This case was filed in the Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, 22-05143, C-10, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Plaintiffs challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court to president over the case and sought remand.

More...   $0 (06-05-2023 - LA)

Nathan Hansen v. Windsong Ranch Community Association, Inc. et al.

Sherman, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

The case was filed in the 393rd Judicial District, Denton County, Texas and was removed to federal court by the
Defendants.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court and sought remand.
"Federal courts have jurisdiction over civil cases in a variety of situation

More...   $0 (06-05-2023 - TX)

Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry Internsational Corp. v. Nearmap, U.S., Inc.; Nearmap Austrial Pty, Ltd.; and Nearmap, Ltd.

Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property law lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in patent infringement throries.


In this patent infringement case, Plaintiffs Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. (collectively, “EagleView”) filed a motion to compel Defendant Nearmap US, Inc.[1] to supplement its discovery responses in two areas.[2] First, Eag

More...   $0 (05-18-2023 - UT)

B.E. Technology, LLC v. Twitter, Inc. and Google, LLC

Wilmington, Delaware patent infringement lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants claiming that they were violating "United States Patent Nos, 8,549,410 (“the '410 patent”), 8,549,411 (“the '411 patent”), and 8,769,440 (“the '440 patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents”). D.1.1. All of the /Asserted Patents expired in 2018. D.I. 67 at 2.

The PT AB issued Fi

More...   $0 (05-16-2023 - DE)

Christopher Sadowski v. Impcto Latin New,s Inc., d/b/a Impacto Latino

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

Copyright infringement is the use of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner. Copyright infringement can take many forms, including:

Copying or distributing a copyrighted work without permission.
Performing or di

More...   $0 (05-12-2023 - NY)

Noah Lebowitz v. Harmoney Nutraceuticals, LLC

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, dis

More...   $0 (04-26-2023 - OK)

Kathryn Townsend Griffin, et al. v. Edward Christopher Sheeran a/k/a "Ed Sheeran," et al.

New York, New York civil litigation lawyers represented plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories under 17 U.S.C. 101.

Plaintiff Structured Asset Sales, LLC, as a beneficial owner of the copyright to the 1973 hit song "Let's Get It On," brings this action against Defendants Edward Christopher Sheeran, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BDi Music Ltd., Bucks Music Grou

More...   $0 (05-04-2023 - NY)

Kirk Johnson v. Chad Kroeger, et al.

Austin, Texas intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on a copyright infringement theory.


Plaintiff Kirk Johnston brought this copyright infringement suit against Chad Kroeger, Michael Kroeger, Ryan Peake, Daniel Adair, Roadrunner Records, Inc., and Warner Chappell Music, Inc. Defendants are the individual members of the group Nickelback and the record

More...   $0 (03-16-2023 - TX)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher