John Fielding v. The University of Chicago |
Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright infringement theory. |
Seffrey B. Sedlik v. Katherine Von Drachenberg, a/k/a Kat Von D |
Los Angeles, California intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendants in a copyright infringement dispute. |
Scott Hargis, D/B/A Scott Hargis Photo v. Pacifica Senior Living Management LLC, et al. |
Los Angeles, California intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides: |
United States of America v. Benjamin Adu Acheampong |
Cincinnati, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with romance-fraud conspiracy and making false statements on a COVID‑relief application. |
United States of America v. Jon Q. Wright v. Cornhole Stop, LLC and Shirley Kowtko |
Detroit, Michigan intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on copyright infringement theories.... More... $1 (12-06-2023 - MI) |
Mark Post v. MT Dank Tank LLC, et al. |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a copyright |
Daniel William McKnight v. LawNewz, Inc. |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe |
Akron, Ohio intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on 17 U.S.C. 101 a copyright infringement theory. |
Reed Timmer v. Medialinks TV, LLC |
Washington, DC intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright violation theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roosters Cocktails, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 101. |
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe |
Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copy right infringement theory. |
Allan Tannenbaum v. CityRealty.com, LLC |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyrights infringement law. |
Christopher Sadowski v. Romanian-American Network, Inc. |
Chicago, Illinois intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Gregory P. Mango v. The Blark Wall Street Times, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma copyright lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Gregory P. Mango v. Newsmax Media, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Michael Stokes v. Gold Productions, Inc., d/b/a Girls Night Out The Show |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie" |
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc. |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
James Messerschmidt v. EE Bar, LLC |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff that sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.... More... $0 (08-04-2023 - NY) |
Dawn Cutillo, et al. v. David Cutillo, et al. |
Allentown, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories. |
Laurie Rubin v. Trendland, L.L.C. |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides: |
John Kraljevich v. Courser Athletics, Inc. |
Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories. |
Christopher Sadowski v. Impcto Latin New,s Inc., d/b/a Impacto Latino |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Kathryn Townsend Griffin, et al. v. Edward Christopher Sheeran a/k/a "Ed Sheeran," et al. |
New York, New York civil litigation lawyers represented plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories under 17 U.S.C. 101. |
Next Page |