United States of America v. Adiangel Paredes |
Wocester, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distibute and to possess with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin, 400 grams or more of fentanyl, 280 grams or more of cocaine base, and 500 grams or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846. $0 (11-01-2023 - MA) |
United States of America v. Fabio Yepes Sanchez |
Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug trafficking, money laundering and extortion conspiracy connected to organized crime in the Republic of Colombia. |
United States of America v. Henry Geoffrey Watson |
San Francisco, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with accepting kickbacks for patient referrals to home health agencies, health care fraud, and false statements relating to a health care matter. |
United States of America v. Omar Arias Casilla |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute narcotics in violation for 21 U.S.C. 846. $0 (11-09-2023 - NY) |
State of Connecticut v. Sean Adams |
New Haven, Connecticut defendant was charged with murder, conspiracy and assault. |
United States of America v. Daniel Bahena Ortiz |
Phoenix, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation 18 U.S.C. 371, which provides: |
United States of America v. Paul Emerson Schofield and Sara Ellen Schofield |
Jefferson City, Missouri criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with video recording their sexual assault of a child victim. |
United States of America v. Samuel Wayne Bolling, Jr. |
Hot Springs, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with kidnapping of a minor female. |
United States of America v. Liem Duy Nguyen |
Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21:841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. $0 (11-06-2023 - MN) |
United States of America v. Amondo Antoine Miller |
Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with mail and wire fraud for their roles in a decades-long telemarketing scam that targeted 150,000 mostly retired magazine subscribers. |
State of Florida v. Charles Adelson |
Tallahassee, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy and solicitation to commit murder. |
United States of America v. Hasna Bashir Iwas. R.Ph. |
Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with filling forged prescriptions for controlled substances over several years in exchange for more than $640,000. |
United States of America v. Dawne Dorsey |
Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with accepting bribes in return for giving out confidential information held by the D.C. Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD). |
United States of America v. Chester Fletcher Wallace |
Greensboro, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking ring based out of a three-bedroom house located in Durham that he rented from July 2021 until late spring of 2022. |
United States of America v. Lawrence A. Walker |
Baltimore, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and fraudulently obtaining more than $262,000 through the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), intended to provide financial assistance to small businesses under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act. |
United States of America v. Brandon Nash |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to make utter and possess forced securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1344, and aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1028A. $0 (11-03-2023 - OK) |
United States of America v. Oscar Rodriguez Reyes |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs i violation of 21 U.S.C. 846. $0 (11-03-2023 - OK) |
United States of America v. Bobby Chris Mayes and Charles Gooch |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud, conspiracy, issuing forged securities, aggravated identity theft, and obstruction of justice. |
United States of America v. Samuel Bankman-Fried |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
United States of America v. Marc Eric Johnson |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with charged with conspiracy to affect commerce by robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846. $0 (11-02-2023 - PA) |
Stacey Gonzalez, et al. v. City of Philadelphia, et al. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories. |
United States of America v. Sunday Daniel Ganyo |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud and transportation of stolen property. |
United States of America v. Erik Eduardo Velazquez Bautista and Jesus Alejandro Rodriguez Velasquez |
Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute fentanyl and methamphetamine in New Jersey and elsewhere. |
United States of America v. Brijesh Goel |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with insider trading and obstruction of justice. |
United States of America v. Dexter Enwerem |
New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud and tax offenses stemming from a scheme that defrauded women approached through their social media accounts. |
Next Page |