Cheap-O-Rooter, Inc. v. Marmalade Square Condominium Homeowners Association, et al. |
¶1 Defendants Marmalade Square Condominium Homeowners Association, Bruce Manka, and Frank Guyman (collectively Marmalade) appeal the district court's decision to set aside a default judgment entered against Plaintiff Cheap-O-Rooter, Inc. after Cheap-O-Rooter failed to appear at a hearing. In moving to have the default judgment set aside, Cheap-O-Rooter submitted a motion with no accompanying memo... More... $0 (11-13-2009 - UT) |
Lynne Bloch v. Edward Frischholz |
In this case, we consider whether condominium owners can sue their condo association under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq., for alleged religious and racial discrimination that took place after the owners bought their condo unit. We highlight the word “after” because based on a prior opinion from this court, Halprin v. Prairie Single Family Homes of Dearborn Park Ass’... More... $0 (11-13-2009 - IL) |
Susan Cohn v. The Grand Condominium Association, Inc.; PH Hotel, Inc.; and PH Retail, Inc. |
This is an appeal of a summary judgment which found subsection 718.404(2), Florida Statutes (2007), unconstitutional as applied to The Grand Condominium. We affirm. |
Ghassan Saleh v. Ribeiro Trucking, LLC, et al. |
The plaintiff, Ghassan Saleh, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, which set aside the jury verdict and ordered a new trial on the issue of damages after he refused to accept a court-ordered remittitur. The plaintiff’s sole claim on appeal is that the court improperly ordered the remittitur in the absence of any reason to determine that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence... More... $0 (11-09-2009 - CT) |
Moss Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Ted L. Bissette, et al. |
Ted and Mary Bissette (the “Bissettes”) appeal from orders: (1) granting plaintiffs’ and third-party defendants’ summary judgment motion, (2) dismissing their claim for breach of fiduciary duty, and (3) awarding attorneys’ fees for contempt and enforcement of subdivision restrictions. We affirm in part and reverse in part. |
Warwick Towers Council of Co-Owners v. Park Warwick, L.P., Park Warwick Investments, L.L.C., and Park Hotel Investments, L.L.C. |
Warwick Towers Council of Co-Owners (the ACouncil@) (SIC - The Fourteenth District publishes its reports online with letters substituted for certain characters.), acting by and through St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Park Warwick L.P., Park Warwick Investments, L.L.C., and Park Hotel Investments, L.L.C (collectively, the AHotel Appellee... More... $0 (10-08-2009 - TX) |
David D. Beal, et al. v. David A. McGuire, et al. |
Six members of a joint venture sued two other members, primarily claiming breaches of fiduciary duties. The joint venture, most of whose members were Anchorage physicians, owned a medical services condominium on Laurel Street and leased it out for use as an ambulatory surgical center. The plaintiffs claimed in part that the joint venturer defendants and others were liable for moving the surgical c... More... $0 (10-08-2009 - AK) |
Alan Stein v. Paradigm Mirasol, LLC |
In a market-based economy the price of housing, like other goods, is subject to swings. There was a sharp upward swing in housing prices between late 2000 and the end of 2005, and the resulting bubble was bigger in Florida than it was in most other states. Home prices there rose eighty-two percent in absolute terms during that short period, outstripping the fifty-one percent national increase. See... More... $0 (09-30-2009 - FL) |
Alonzo Mansfield, Jr. v. A & M Automotive |
The plaintiff, Alonzo Mansfield, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, A & M Automotive. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant did not violate General Statutes § 14-145a, (2) failed to find that the defendant was liable for conversion and (3) failed to find that the defendant’s actions constituted a violat... More... $0 (09-29-2009 - CT) |
World Species List - Natural Features Registry Institute v. Richard David Reading & another |
A judge of the Land Court entered a summary judgment declaring that easement language was in essence a view easement that permits the defendants to cut vegetation in order to maintain their view. The plaintiff appeals. We affirm. |
Daniel Guggenhein v. City of Goleta |
Daniel Guggenheim and others bring a facial challenge to the City of Goleta’s mobile home rent control ordinance. |
Home Devco / Tivoli Isles, LLC v. Donna Silver |
The developer appeals from a final judgment, asserting that it was exempt from provisions of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA), 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., because it was obligated to complete construction of the residence within two years of the real estate sales contract. Because the two-year completion provision in the contract was illusory, the developer was not exempt from t... More... $0 (09-23-2009 - FL) |
Bill Mitchell v. The Beach Club of Hallandale Condominium Association, Inc. |
The trial court dismissed appellant’s complaint for an injunction to prevent the levy of a condominium special assessment, without prejudice to refile a complaint which met the “jurisdictional limits” of the court. Because the complaint sought an injunction for which the circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction, we reverse the order of dismissal as well as the order granting prevailing ... More... $0 (09-23-2009 - FL) |
Evan Carolyn v. Orange Park Community Association |
Defendant Orange Park Community Association (OPCA)1 maintains and exercises control over a series of recreational trails on portions of the association “common area” (Civ. Code, § 1351, subd. (b)). The trails border Broadmoor Park homes and Saddlehill development, OPCA residential developments in Orange Park Acres. The OPCA trails connect to a larger system of trails maintained by other assoc... More... $0 (09-22-2009 - CA) |
Dennis Tulley & a. v. William Sheldon & a. |
The plaintiffs, Dennis and Patricia Tulley, appeal the order of the Derry District Court (Stephen, J.) as it pertains to the denial of expert witness costs, attorney’s fees, and prejudgment interest arising out of an action against the defendants, William and Deanna Sheldon. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. |
Dennis Tulley & a. v. William Sheldon & a. |
The plaintiffs, Dennis and Patricia Tulley, appeal the order of the Derry District Court (Stephen, J.) as it pertains to the denial of expert witness costs, attorney’s fees, and prejudgment interest arising out of an action against the defendants, William and Deanna Sheldon. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. |
John Delois v. Barrett Block Partners, et al. |
In 2006, a dispute arose between plaintiff Delois, then a tenant of defendants in a “live/work” space on Harrison Street in San Francisco, and defendants. The dispute, described in more detail below, was purportedly resolved by a written agreement between the parties. But various and sundry factors led to alleged breaches of that agreement; in any event, plaintiff did not vacate the premises o... More... $0 (09-18-2009 - CA) |
Auto Owners Insurance Company, Inc. v. Virginia T. Newman and Trinity Construction, Inc. |
The issuer of a homebuilder’s commercial general liability policy sought a declaratory judgment to determine whether the policy covered a homeowner’s claim for damages caused by the negligence of a construction subcontractor. The trial court determined that the homeowner’s claim fell within the policy’s coverage and this appeal followed. We certified the case pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCA... More... $0 (09-08-2009 - SC) |
Dennis W. Byars v. Staven G. Berg, et al. |
The plaintiff,1 Dennis W. Byars, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Connecticut Condo Connection and Cathy Luciano.2 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that his claims are precluded under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Creekridge Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. v. C. Scott Whitten, Inc. |
This is a construction defect case involving a reroofing of 11 buildings that house 61 units in a townhome community. The trial court granted summary judgment to the roofing defendants. The trial court found that the plaintiff townhome association did not meet the statute of limitations because the association had notice of a water moisture problem inside the window of one unit as a result of the ... More... $0 (09-02-2009 - CA) |
FWT, Inc. v. Haskin Wallace Mason Property Management, LLP |
Texas law is clear that a right of first refusal empowers its holder with a preferential right to purchase the subject property on the same terms offered by or to a bona fide purchaser. Tenneco Inc. v. Enter. Prods. Co., 925 S.W.2d 640, 644 (Tex. 1996). What is less clear is whether the holder of a preferential right who desires to exercise that right can be required under certain circumstances ... More... $0 (08-28-2009 - TX) |
Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company v. Dyna Ten Corporation |
Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Dyna Ten Corporation. We reverse and remand. |
Comcast of Florida, L.P. v. L'Ambiance Beach Condominium Association, Inc. |
A conflict between a cable television provider and a condominium association forms the basis for this appeal. Comcast appeals an order upholding the condominium association’s terminatio n of a cable television agreement, pursuant to section 718.302, Fla. Stat. (2002).1 It raises numerous issues concerning the validity of the termination. We find no error and affirm, but write to address the appl... More... $0 (08-26-2009 - FL) |
Lisa K. Massad v. Sarah J. Greaves |
If a lawsuit has been improperly removed from a state court to a federal court, federal law requires the federal court to order a remand and authorizes the federal court to make an award of costs and attorney’s fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c).1 In the present case, the federal court made an award of attorney’s fees and costs but directed that the supporting documentation justifying the amount ... More... $0 (08-25-2009 - CT) |
Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association v. Restoration Development Corproation |
Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association (Association) appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County (trial court) granting the summary judgment motion of Restoration Development Corporation (Restoration), affirming Restoration’s title to a disputed two-acre parcel of property, and Restoration’s right of access to that two-acre parcel across a portion of the Association’... More... $0 (08-20-2009 - PA) |
Next Page |