| HOCHSTETLER et al v. USA |
|
Section 1247(d) of the Trails Act prompts certain federal agencies to encourage the conversion of unused railroad rights-of-way into recreational trails by state and local governments or private entities. See 16 U.S.C. § 1247 (2012). One of these federal agencies, the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), is tasked with regulating the construction, operation, and abandonment of railroad lines in t $0 (03-13-2016 - DC) |
| LAKE HENDRICKS IMPROVEMENT ASSOC. v. BROOKINGS CTY. PLANNING & ZONING COMM’N |
|
Developers desire to build a dairy on Owner’s property in Brookings |
| American Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 7 |
|
As we explained in ASE I, the structural steel industry |
| Plains Pipeline, L.P. v. thomas Joseph Montgomery, Roberta Ann Montgomery, Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County and Jim Reynolds, Cleveland County Treasurer |
|
Norman, OK - Plains Pipeline, L.P. sued Thomas Joseph Montgomery, Roberta Ann Montgomery, Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County and Jim Reynolds, Cleveland County Treasurer on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the Defendants by condemnation for the construction of a private pipeline. |
| State of Nebraska v. Detron L. Perry |
|
On September 5, 2012, law enforcement officers Chris Brown and Mike Sundermeier of the Omaha Police Department were on patrol in the area of 35th and Hamilton Streets in Omaha, Nebraska. They observed a vehicle traveling eastbound on Hamilton Street. It turned northbound onto 35th Street without using a turn signal, and when the brakes were applied, the officers noticed the vehicle’s left tailligh $0 (02-13-2016 - NE) |
| SHARRON JENKINS v. CHICAGO PACIFIC CORPORATION, et al |
|
Sharron and Gerald Jenkins received, by quitclaim deed, property that had previously been used by the Chicago, Kansas and Nebraska Railway Company, the predecessor of Chicago Pacific Corporation, (Chicago Pacific) as a railroad track |
| State of Vermont v. Peter A. Goewey |
|
Defendant and the State entered a plea agreement, in exchange for which the |
| Hoffer Properties, LLC v. State of Wisconsin |
|
This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming a grant |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Whataburger Real Estates, L.P. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Whataburger Real Estates, L.P. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire certain rights title and interest in real property owned by Defendant for public purposes. |
| CLAUDE SEARS, et al. v. UNITED STATES |
|
Before the court in this rails-to-trails takings case are the government’s motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 56(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Both motions pertain to the interest rate that should be applied beyond February 3, 2016 as part of the just compensation that has otherwise been $0 (01-29-2016 - DC) |
| Rosalie Simon v. Republic of Hungary |
|
This case arises out of one of humanity’s darkest hours. In the summer of 1944, upon the arrival of German troops in Nazi-allied Hungary, the Hungarian government implemented an accelerated campaign to deport Hungarian Jews to Nazi death camps for extermination before the War’s end. At the outset of the War, the Jewish population in Hungary numbered more than 800,000. By the end of the War, mo $0 (01-29-2016 - DC) |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Lamar Central Outdoor, L.L.C. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Lamara for public use. |
| Authors Guild Inc., et al. v. Google, Inc. |
|
The United States of America, by and through counsel, submits this statement of its views |
| U.S. v. Apple, Inc., et al. |
|
In 2010, in conjunction with the launch of its iPad tablet computer, petitioner became a retailer of electronic books (ebooks). In order to enter that market on its preferred terms, petitioner orchestrated a conspiracy with five major publishers to eliminate retail price competition and raise ebook prices. a. In 2009, the “Big Six” publishers—Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin, Random H $0 (01-25-2016 - DC) |
| State Of New Jersey v. Robert Goodwin |
|
A jury found defendant Robert Goodwin guilty of second |
| City of Tulsa v. Square 1 Real Estate, L.L.C. |
|
Tulsa, OK - The City of Tulsa sued Square 1 Real Estate, L.L.C. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendant to use for public purposes. |
| State Of New Jersey v. Robert Goodwin |
|
A jury found defendant Robert Goodwin guilty of second |
| State Of Kansas v. Reed |
|
On February 1, 2013, Reed, a first time offender with no criminal history, pleaded no contest to one count of attempted aggravated indecent liberties with a child (crime occurred between June and October 2009), a sexually violent crime pursuant to K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 22-3717(d)(2)(C) and (K), subject to mandatory lifetime postrelease supervision pursuant to K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 22-3717(d)(1)(G). At his $0 (01-12-2016 - KS) |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Stantan B. Noble a/k/a Stan B. Noble |
|
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued Stantan B. Noble a/k/a Stan B. Noble on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendant for public highway purposes. |
| State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Transportation v. Kenneth E. Brashear, et al. |
|
Claremore, OK - The State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Transportation sued Kenneth E. Brashear, et al. on eminent domain theories seeking to condemn certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by the Defendants for public use. |
| Shelby County v. James Crews, et al. |
|
This case involves competing claims over a small parcel of real property located near Shelby Farms in Shelby County, Tennessee. The property was formerly the site of an old railroad depot, and the County had possession of the property for many years preceding the commencement of this litigation. The County used the land as a parking lot for the nearby Shelby County Penal Farm. The AppelleesR $0 (12-17-2015 - TN) |
| State of Oklahoma ex rel, Department of Transportation v. Independent School District #1 of Rogers County Oklahoma |
|
Claremore, OK - State of Oklahoma ex rel, Department of Transportation v. Independent School District #1 of Rogers County Oklahoma on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in land owned by the Defendant. |
| Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000) v. State of Mississippi Ex Rel. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics |
|
On January 22, 2012, John Norman Cole was arrested after he failed to stop at a driver’s license checkpoint that was being conducted by law enforcement officers at the intersection of Highway 84 and Clem Road in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi. After a short police pursuit, Cole crashed his Toyota Camry into the rear of a trailer approximately five miles from the checkpoint. Cole fled the acci $0 (12-12-2015 - MS) |
| Cameo Bobo v. City of Jackson, Tennessee |
|
This case stems from the demolition of a home formerly located at 425 North Hays Street in Jackson, Tennessee. The home at issue was previously owned by Appellant‟s grandmother, Dorothy Lipson (“Ms. Lipson”). While Ms. Lipson owned the home, its condition deteriorated, and proceedings were initiated in the Environmental Court of the City of Jackson to address the state of the property. On $0 (12-12-2015 - TN) |
| Western Farmers Electric Cooperative of Anadarko, Oklahoma v. Henry Ndekwe and Patience E. Okon Ndekwe |
|
Lawton, OK - The Western Farmers Electric Cooperative of Anadarko, Oklahoma sued Henry Ndekwe and Patience E. Okon Ndekwe on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests for public use. |
|
Next Page |