Auto Negligence Law
 
Larry Dean v. United States of America

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

... More...
   $0 (03-29-2024 - NM)

Victor Cardenas v. Ever Fresh Farms Transportation, Inc., et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court, Creek County, Oklahoma, CJ-23-0001, and was removed to federal court by Ever Fresh Farms Transportation, Inc., et al.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim... More...
   $0 (03-29-2024 - OK)

Paul Torrez v. Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Boulder County District Court, 2023CV30424, and was removed to federal court by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers which which operates grocery stores in Colorado.

Premises liability is a unique form of a negligence action that holds owners of land r... More...
   $1 (03-29-2024 - CO)

Jose Rodriguez-Rohena and Cassy Quiroa v. Damian Garza, et al.

Denver, Colorado personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic... More...
   $0 (03-29-2024 - CO)

State of Colorado v. Jesus Puebla

Greeley, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with vehicular homicide, carless driving, reckless driving, vehicular assault, a commercial vehicle violation, and driving without a CDL.

The State accused the Defendant of driving a 1999 Kenworth T800 Truck as an excessive speeding and running to a vehicle driven by Aaron Godienz, Halie Everts, Tessleigh and Aaro... More...
   $0 (03-29-2024 - CO)

United States of America v. Evan Brown Bull

Sioux Falls, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession of Ammunition by a Prohibited Person.


Kyle Man Sentenced to Federal Prison



United States Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell announced today that U.S. D... More...   $0 (03-29-2024 - SD)

Carolyn Enzor, et al. v. The Kroger Co.

Savannah, Georgia personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory seeking compensation for the death of the father of K.E., a minor.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV22-00211, and was removed to federal court by The Kroger Co.

The state of Georgia defines wrongful death as being the death of a person c... More...
   $0 (03-28-2024 - GA)

Yolanda Tart v. Union Public Schools, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent herself on an a bullying theory.

GREENOUGH, KELLY M: CASE COMES ON FOR NON-JURY TRIAL. WINSTON BROWN, COURT REPORTER. YOLANDA TART PLAINTIFF PRESENT APPEARS AS PRO SE. DEFENDANT EMILY BABB PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY PRESTON BENNETT.
COURT HEARD PLAINTIFFS-COUNTER DEFENDANT CASE IN CHIEF, SIX (6) WITNESSES SWORN AND TESTIMONY TAKEN. ... More...
   $0 (03-28-2024 - ok)

Mee Lee, et al. v. Jonathan D. Hughes, et al.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

Oklahoma's comparative negligence statute includes a so-called “50-percent rule.” In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident.

... More...
   $0 (03-28-2024 - OK)

Joseph Dory and Gregory Jones v. United States of America

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.... More...
   $1 (03-27-2024 - ID)

William Peek v. 3M Company, et al.

Pensacola, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on a product liability theory.

More than a century ago, 3M started as a small-scale mining venture in Northern Minnesota, then named Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Now a global powerhouse, our products improve the daily lives of people around the world.

Product liability focuses on the produ... More...
   $1 (03-27-2024 - FL)

John Crum and Sondra Crum v. R.J. Corman Railroad Construction, LLC, et al.

Jacksonville, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County, 2021-CA-001769, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.


Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percent... More...
   $1 (03-27-2024 - FL)

Geoffrey Paul Arce v. Christopher Desh Lachman and Enterprise Holdings Inc., d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-CAR

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced... More...
   $0 (03-27-2024 - OK)

Silva Guerrero-Ramirez v. 99 Cent Only Stores, LLC

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-22-857398-C, and was removed to federal court by 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC.

The civil law of negligence is based upon the concept that a reasonably prudent person should act in a certain way. Negligence... More...
   $0 (03-27-2024 - NV)

Glen Ralph Bertrand v. Colette Renee Bertrand and Shannon Gartner d/b/a Bear Creek Trucking

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.

This case was filed... More...
   $0 (03-27-2024 - MT)

Joseph Dory and Gregory Jones v. United States of America

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories.

Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more responsible for the accident, they cannot recover ... More...
   $1 (03-27-2024 - ID)

United States of America v. Adam Reed; William Dodd

Indianapolis, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with .



Adam Reed and William Dodd have both been sentenced for their roles in a string of armed robberies across Indianapolis in the summer of 2020.

Adam Re... More...   $0 (03-27-2024 - IN)

Clifford Devine v. United States of America

Augusta, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eleventh Circuit, 20-13864-E, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employee... More...
   $1 (03-26-2024 - GA)

Britta Franck v. Skylar Thurmond and Waterfall Group, LLC

Wichita, Kansas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Formed in 1995, The Waterfall Group, LLC has advised commercial real estate clients locally and nationally to maximize value and increase return on investment.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to ... More...
   $1 (03-26-2024 - KS)

Luis Dvid Ruiz v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., et al.

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 8th Judicial District Court, A-22-853257-C, and was removed to federal court by Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al.

Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a victim is... More...
   $1 (03-26-2024 - NV)

Devin Whittier v. Seattle Tunnel Partners, et al.

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 17-00002-04219-6, and was removed by Seattle Tunnel Partners, et al.

If a person acts carelessly and injures someone as a direct result of that carelessness, the careless party must pay compensation to the injured party. “... More...
   $0 (03-26-2024 - WA)

Irene Macias v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County, C22-02469, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability laws in California are based on negligence, which is represented under Civil Code §1714(a). I... More...
   $1 (03-26-2024 - CA)

Hugo Hernandez v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Wichita, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

... More...
   $1 (03-25-2024 - KS)

Estate of Clayton D. Elston, et al. v. Drisco, LLC, et al.

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence and wrongful death theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

Drisco L.L.C. is a pri... More...
   $1 (03-25-2024 - KS)

Debra Brittenham v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Kern County Superior Court, BCV-22-102269 DZ, and was removed to federal court by Home Depot.

Premises liability laws in California are based on negligence, which is represented under Civil Code §1714(a). In a premises liability c... More...
   $0 (03-25-2024 - CA)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: