Amicus Curiae Law
 
Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company v. State of California

Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company (Stanford Vina) sued the State Water
Resources Control Board (the Board), among other defendants, challenging the Board’s
issuance of certain temporary emergency regulations in 2014 and 2015, during the height
of one of the most severe droughts in California’s history. The challenged regulations
established minimum flow requirements on three t... More...
   $0 (07-07-2020 - CA)

City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons Interested In The Matter of Proposition C

In California, “[a]ll political power is inherent in the people,” who
retain “the right to alter or reform” government by voter initiative “when the
public good may require.” (Cal. Const., Art. II, § 1.)1 The question in this
case is whether the people of a city or county may exercise this initiative
power to adopt a special tax when a majority of voters concludes it would
serv... More...
   $0 (07-01-2020 - CA)

Abelardo Martinez v. San Diego County Credit Union

Abelardo Martinez, who is blind, brought an action against San Diego County
Credit Union (Credit Union) claiming its website is incompatible with software
permitting him to read website content. He alleged this defect denied him equal access
to, and full enjoyment of, the Credit Union's website and its physical locations. Martinez
asserted a single cause of action under the Unruh C... More...
   $0 (06-20-2020 - CA)

Gerald Lynn Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia


Sometimes small gestures can have unexpected consequences. Major initiatives practically guarantee them. In our time, few pieces of federal legislation rank in significance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There, in Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on thebasis of r... More...
   $0 (06-15-2020 - GA)

Guillermo Hernandez v. Department of Motor Vehicles

BACKGROUND
Individual taxpayers (Plaintiffs) filed a writ petition and complaint for
declaratory and injunctive relief, seeking to compel the DMV to stop
suspending driver’s licenses without notification of a violation of the
Misdemeanor Statute.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. The DMV provides courts
with electronic and paper methods to notify it of a person... More...
   $0 (06-03-2020 - CA)

STATE OF OHIO v. TERRANCE DASHAWN CRAIG

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today


On October 30, 2017 at 7:42 a.m., Sydney Williams called 911 to report that
Dawon Brigham was s... More...
   $0 (05-24-2020 - OH)

Crosno Construction, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America

North Edwards Water District (the District) selected Clark Bros., Inc. (Clark) as its
general or direct contractor on a public works project to build an arsenic removal water
treatment plant. Clark hired subcontractor Crosno Construction (Crosno) to build and
coat two steel reservoir tanks. The subcontract contained a "pay-when-paid" provision
that stated Clark would pay Crosno wit... More...
   $0 (04-18-2020 - CA)

Justin Kim v. Reins International California, Inc.

This case presents an issue of first impression: Do
employees lose standing to pursue a claim under the Labor Code
Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698
et seq.)1
if they settle and dismiss their individual claims for
Labor Code violations? We conclude the answer is no.
Settlement of individual claims does not strip an aggrieved
employee of stan... More...
   $0 (04-13-2020 - CA)

Amgen, Inc. v. Health care Services

Health and Safety Code section 127677, enacted as part of
Senate Bill No. 17 (Stats. 2017, ch. 603, § 4), requires
pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide 60-days’ notice to
public and private registered purchasers, including state entities
and health insurers, before increasing the wholesale acquisition
cost of a drug (we will refer to the notice as a “price increase
notic... More...
   $0 (04-11-2020 - CA)

Amgen, Inc. v. Health care Services

Health and Safety Code section 127677, enacted as part of
Senate Bill No. 17 (Stats. 2017, ch. 603, § 4), requires
pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide 60-days’ notice to
public and private registered purchasers, including state entities
and health insurers, before increasing the wholesale acquisition
cost of a drug (we will refer to the notice as a “price increase
notic... More...
   $0 (04-11-2020 - CA)

Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Inc., Real Party in Interest

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Montrose Chemical Corporation (Montrose) was sued for
causing continuous environmental da... More...
   $0 (04-07-2020 - CA)

City of Redondo Beach v. Alex Padilla, as Secretary of State, etc.

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



In 2015 the California Legislature enacted the California
Voter Participation Rights Act ... More...
   $0 (03-24-2020 - CA)

In Re: The State of Texas

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Quezada has been charged with family-violence assault with one or more prior family
violen... More...
   $0 (03-21-2020 - TX)

Victrola 89, LLC v. Jaman Properties 8, LLC

After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased
a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,
LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman
Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael
Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,
regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in
the Property. Based on the... More...
   $0 (03-12-2020 - CA)

Victrola 89, LLC v. Jaman Properties 8, LLC

After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased
a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,
LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman
Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael
Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,
regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in
the Property. Based on the... More...
   $0 (03-12-2020 - CA)

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al.

Forty years ago, Congress recognized that refugees fleeing imminent persecution do not have the luxury of choosing their escape route into the United States. It mandated equity in its treatment of all refugees, however they arrived.1
This principle is embedded in the Refugee Act of 1980, which established an asylum procedure available to any migrant, “irrespective of such alien’s status,” and ... More...
   $0 (02-29-2020 - CA)

State of New Jersey v. Luis Melendez, a/k/a Arturo Melendez and Pito Melendez


Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining whether a defendant’s answer to a civil forfeiture complaint can be introduced against him in a related criminal trial in New Jersey?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



In this appeal, we consider whether a defendant’s answer to a civil
forfeiture... More...
   $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

State of New Jersey v. Randy K. Manning


Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance law in New Jersey?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



Cell-phone records can reveal intimate details about peoples’ lives and
relationships -- the persons and groups with whom they associate, t... More...
   $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

State of New Jersey v. Donna M. Alessi


Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining whether the police may pull over a driver for questioning in furtherance of an investigation without reasonable suspicion in New Jersey?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



We adduce the following facts from the trial record, suppression hearing,
an... More...
   $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

State of West Virginia vs. Crystal W.


Need help finding a lawyer for representation concerning appealing a child abuse resulting in serious bodily injury charge in West Virginia?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.




Petitioner Crystal W., by counsel Dana F. Eddy, appeals the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County’s September 18, 2017, order sentenci... More...
   $0 (02-02-2020 - WV)

Tamika Schmidt v. Superior Court, County of Ventura

Two court employees alleged a security guard named David
Jacques sexually harassed them with his metal detecting wand
during the courthouse entry screening process. All security
screening was in public and on video. None of the video
supported the allegations. After a lengthy bench trial, the trial
court ruled the plaintiffs had not proved their allegations. The
employees a... More...
   $0 (01-26-2020 - CA)

THE STATE EX REL. NEW WEN, INC., D.B.A. WENDY’S v. MARCHBANKS, DIR., ET AL.


Need help finding a lawyer for representation for seeking a writ of mandamus in Ohio

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



State Route 16 (“S.R. 16”) generally travels east-west through Licking County, in large part as a four-lane, limited-access, divided highway. Until late 2016, Cherry Valley Road, a.k.a. Coun... More...
   $0 (01-16-2020 - OH)

Dignity Health v. Local Initiative Health Care Authority of Los Angeles County

Plaintiffs and appellants Dignity Health and Northridge
Hospital Medical Center (Northridge Hospital; collectively,
plaintiffs) appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of
defendant and respondent Local Initiative Health Care Authority
of Los Angeles County dba L.A. Care Health Plan (defendant).
Defendant is a managed care health plan that provides health
care cover... More...
   $0 (01-12-2020 - CA)

Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. v. Thomas E. Dobbs, M.P.H., et al.

This case concerns a Mississippi law that prohibits abortions, with limited exceptions, after 15 weeks’ gestational age. The central question before us is whether this law is an unconstitutional ban on pre-viability abortions. In an unbroken line dating to Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court’s abortion cases have established (and affirmed, and re-affirmed) a woman’s right to choose an abortion before v... More...   $0 (12-16-2019 - MS)

Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Jr., Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump, et al. v. Deutsche Bank, AG

This appeal raises an important issue concerning the investigative authority
of two committees of the United States House of Representatives and the
protection of privacy due the President of the United States suing in his individual,
not official, capacity with respect to financial records. The specific issue is the
lawfulness of three subpoenas issued by the House Committee on Fi... More...
   $0 (12-04-2019 - NY)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: