Amicus Curiae Law
 
Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Inc., Real Party in Interest

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Montrose Chemical Corporation (Montrose) was sued for
causing continuous environmental da... More...
   $0 (04-07-2020 - CA)

City of Redondo Beach v. Alex Padilla, as Secretary of State, etc.

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



In 2015 the California Legislature enacted the California
Voter Participation Rights Act ... More...
   $0 (03-24-2020 - CA)

In Re: The State of Texas

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Quezada has been charged with family-violence assault with one or more prior family
violen... More...
   $0 (03-21-2020 - TX)

Victrola 89, LLC v. Jaman Properties 8, LLC

After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased
a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,
LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman
Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael
Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,
regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in
the Property. Based on the... More...
   $0 (03-12-2020 - CA)

Victrola 89, LLC v. Jaman Properties 8, LLC

After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased
a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,
LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman
Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael
Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,
regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in
the Property. Based on the... More...
   $0 (03-12-2020 - CA)

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al.

Forty years ago, Congress recognized that refugees fleeing imminent persecution do not have the luxury of choosing their escape route into the United States. It mandated equity in its treatment of all refugees, however they arrived.1
This principle is embedded in the Refugee Act of 1980, which established an asylum procedure available to any migrant, “irrespective of such alien’s status,” and ... More...
   $0 (02-29-2020 - CA)

State of New Jersey v. Luis Melendez, a/k/a Arturo Melendez and Pito Melendez


Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining whether a defendant’s answer to a civil forfeiture complaint can be introduced against him in a related criminal trial in New Jersey?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



In this appeal, we consider whether a defendant’s answer to a civil
forfeiture... More...
   $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

State of New Jersey v. Randy K. Manning


Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance law in New Jersey?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



Cell-phone records can reveal intimate details about peoples’ lives and
relationships -- the persons and groups with whom they associate, t... More...
   $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

State of New Jersey v. Donna M. Alessi


Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining whether the police may pull over a driver for questioning in furtherance of an investigation without reasonable suspicion in New Jersey?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



We adduce the following facts from the trial record, suppression hearing,
an... More...
   $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

State of West Virginia vs. Crystal W.


Need help finding a lawyer for representation concerning appealing a child abuse resulting in serious bodily injury charge in West Virginia?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.




Petitioner Crystal W., by counsel Dana F. Eddy, appeals the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County’s September 18, 2017, order sentenci... More...
   $0 (02-02-2020 - WV)

Tamika Schmidt v. Superior Court, County of Ventura

Two court employees alleged a security guard named David
Jacques sexually harassed them with his metal detecting wand
during the courthouse entry screening process. All security
screening was in public and on video. None of the video
supported the allegations. After a lengthy bench trial, the trial
court ruled the plaintiffs had not proved their allegations. The
employees a... More...
   $0 (01-26-2020 - CA)

THE STATE EX REL. NEW WEN, INC., D.B.A. WENDY’S v. MARCHBANKS, DIR., ET AL.


Need help finding a lawyer for representation for seeking a writ of mandamus in Ohio

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.



State Route 16 (“S.R. 16”) generally travels east-west through Licking County, in large part as a four-lane, limited-access, divided highway. Until late 2016, Cherry Valley Road, a.k.a. Coun... More...
   $0 (01-16-2020 - OH)

Dignity Health v. Local Initiative Health Care Authority of Los Angeles County

Plaintiffs and appellants Dignity Health and Northridge
Hospital Medical Center (Northridge Hospital; collectively,
plaintiffs) appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of
defendant and respondent Local Initiative Health Care Authority
of Los Angeles County dba L.A. Care Health Plan (defendant).
Defendant is a managed care health plan that provides health
care cover... More...
   $0 (01-12-2020 - CA)

Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. v. Thomas E. Dobbs, M.P.H., et al.

This case concerns a Mississippi law that prohibits abortions, with limited exceptions, after 15 weeks’ gestational age. The central question before us is whether this law is an unconstitutional ban on pre-viability abortions. In an unbroken line dating to Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court’s abortion cases have established (and affirmed, and re-affirmed) a woman’s right to choose an abortion before v... More...   $0 (12-16-2019 - MS)

Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Jr., Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump, et al. v. Deutsche Bank, AG

This appeal raises an important issue concerning the investigative authority
of two committees of the United States House of Representatives and the
protection of privacy due the President of the United States suing in his individual,
not official, capacity with respect to financial records. The specific issue is the
lawfulness of three subpoenas issued by the House Committee on Fi... More...
   $0 (12-04-2019 - NY)

United States of America v. Roberto Arturo Perez

If this were an Encyclopedia Brown mystery, it might be called The Case of the Polite Bank Robber.1 Without any weapons, Defendant-Appellant Roberto Arturo Perez calmly walked into two different banks. He handed a teller at each bank a note with instructions using words like “please” and “thank you,” made no reference to any type of weapon, bargained pleasantly with one teller for $5,000, and allo... More...   $0 (12-02-2019 - FL)

Sarah Anderson v. City of San Jose

In this appeal we decide whether a California charter city’s policy for the sale of
surplus city-owned land is preempted by the state’s affordable housing law.
The dispute centers on the City of San Jose’s passage of City Policy 7-13 (Policy
7-13), which appellants Sarah Anderson, Joana Cruz, Urban Habitat Program, and
Housing California contend violates the Surplus Land Act (Gov. ... More...
   $0 (11-29-2019 - CA)

Jessica Millan Patterson v. Alex Padilla, as Secretary of State, etc.

We must decide in this case whether portions of the
recently enacted Presidential Tax Transparency and
Accountability Act (Elec. Code, § 6880 et seq.) (the Act) conflict
with article II, section 5, subdivision (c) of the California
Constitution (article II, section 5(c)) and are therefore invalid.
At issue are the Act’s provisions that prohibit the Secretary of
State from p... More...
   $0 (11-24-2019 - CA)

United States of America ex rel. Robert Kraus and Paul Bishop v. State of New York, ex rel. Paul Bishop, et al.

This case arises out of the 2008 financial crisis. This appeal—appellants’
second—asks us to decide whether the False Claims Act (the “Act” or the
“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., applies to persons who defraud the emergency
lending facilities of the Federal Reserve System (the “Fed”).
4
Paul Bishop and Robert Kraus (“relators”) allege that Wells Fargo &
Company and Wells ... More...
   $0 (11-22-2019 - NY)

Jane Doe v. Dallas Independent School District




Appellant Jane Doe appeals the district court’s dismissal of her Title IX complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE the distri... More...
   $0 (10-25-2019 - TX)

Anthony Rudick v. State Board of Optometry

This is an appeal from judgment after the trial court denied the petition for writ of
mandate filed by plaintiffs Anthony Rudick, O.D., and Ridge Eye Care, Inc. (Ridge) and
granted summary judgment in favor of defendant State Board of Optometry (Board) and
against plaintiffs on their related complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. On
appeal, plaintiffs seek reversal of the... More...
   $0 (10-15-2019 - CA)

Blakely Mchugh v. Protective Life Insurance

This appeal raises one fundamental issue: whether Insurance Code sections
10113.71 and 10113.721 ("the statutes"), which came into effect on January 1, 2013,
apply to term life insurance policies issued before the statutes' effective date. In 2005,
Protective Life Insurance Company (Protective Life) issued William Patrick McHugh a
60-year term life policy (the policy) that provided... More...
   $0 (10-13-2019 - CA)

Jessica Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC

Does “regular rate of compensation” for calculating meal
or rest break premium payments mean the same thing as
“regular rate of pay” for calculating overtime premium payments,
and does facially neutral “rounding” of employee work time
systematically undercompensate Jessica Ferra and a class of
employees of Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC (Loews)? We agree
with the trial court th... More...
   $0 (10-10-2019 - CA)

Travelers Property Casualty Company pf America v. Worker's Compensation Appeals Board and California Insurance Guarantee Association

Two employers agreed that the general employer would
obtain workers’ compensation insurance for employees it leased
to the special employer.1
Relying on this agreement, the special
employer obtained workers’ compensation insurance for its own
employees with a “limiting endorsement” excluding coverage for
special employees. These agreements were in place for several
year... More...
   $0 (10-04-2019 - CA)

Gustavo Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.

Named plaintiff and class representative Gustavo Naranjo and a
certified class of former and current employees took their lawsuit
against defendant Spectrum Security Services, Inc. (Spectrum) to trial.
They alleged Labor Code section 226.71 meal break violations and
sought premium wages, derivative remedies pursuant to sections 203
(waiting time penalties) and 226 (itemized wag... More...
   $0 (09-28-2019 - CA)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: