Kurt West v. Bell Hilicopter Textron, Inc. |
For thousands of years, |
Arapaho Owners Association, Inc. and Kattalia v. Alpert, et al. |
Initially, this case appeared to require reconciliation of language in a condominium declaration, the Vermont Condominium Ownership Act (VCOA), and the Vermont Common Interest Ownership Act (VCIOA). After untangling the facts and the statutes, however, we resolve the matter in a more straightforward manner. We affirm. |
Carl "Stacey" Neese, individually and a/n/f of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese, et al. v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf, et al. |
Appellants sued appellees on several theories of liability including barratry. The trial court granted a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of appellees. Appellants raise thirteen issues on appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in part, reverse it in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
Sanders v. Yanez |
Mary is the only child of the marriage of Marion C. Sanders and Herbert H. Sanders. Mary’s half brother, George, is Herbert’s son and Marion’s stepson. Respondent Jody Lynn Sanders Yanez is George’s eldest daughter. |
IN RE THE CROW WATER COMPACT |
This case arises from the Crow Compact, an agreement among the United States, |
Landmark American Insurance Company v. VO Remarketing Corp. |
Denver, CO - Tenth Circuit holds that insurance company had no duty to defend of indemnify its insured |
In the Interest of K.D., a Minor Child |
The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (the Department) filed a petition seeking to terminate Mother’s parental rights to her fourteen-year-old daughter, K.D. A trial court “may order termination of the parent-child relationship if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence[] (1) that the parent has . . . executed . . . an . . . irrevocable affidavit of relinquishment of pare... More... $0 (07-29-2015 - TX) |
Stride Staffing v. Antonio Holloway |
In this interlocutory appeal, appellant Stride Staffing appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. |
Gregory N. Jones v. Mackey Price Thompson & Ostler, et al. |
Salt Lake City, UT - Utah Supreme Court reverses district court's denial of claimed right to jury trial |
ALFREDO TIRADO vs. BOARD OF APPEAL ON MOTOR VEHICLE LIABILITY POLICIES AND BONDS |
In these consolidated appeals, we are asked to |
United States of America v. Michael Romano |
Brooklyn, NY - Second Circuit affirms conspiracy convictions of two for mail and wire fraud |
LVNV Funding, LLC v. Trice |
Matthew Trice used a credit card to pay for some plumbing work. He apparently did not pay the credit card company the full amount due on the card. The credit card company sold its interest in the unpaid debt to LVNV. Thereafter, LVNV hired an Illinois attorney and filed a debt collection lawsuit against Trice, who proceeded pro se. On January 15, 2009, the circuit court entered judgment in the law... More... $0 (07-26-2015 - ) |
United States of America v. Manuel Antonio Soto |
This case involves the drug-trafficking, |
Clyde R. Parks v. Scott A. Seybold |
Appellant Clyde R. Parks appeals a judgment granted in favor of appellee Scott A. Seybold to recover a debt owed on a note after suit on the note became barred by limitations. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Seybold based on Parks’s written acknowledgment of the debt. Parks presents five issues on appeal,2 and complains (1) the trial court erred in finding h... More... $0 (07-23-2015 - TX) |
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.; Psychiatric Resource Partners, Inc.; Michael A. Saul; Timothy J. Palus; Peter D. Ulasewicz; Barbara H. Bayma; and John M. Piechocki v. Horizon Health Corporation |
Horizon Health Corporation (Horizon) moved for a rehearing of this panel’s February 26, 2015 memorandum opinion and judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.1. We grant the motion, withdraw our February 26, 2015 memorandum |
Tamco Pork II v. Heatland Co-Op and PRo Build, LLC |
Tamco Pork II, LLC, and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, as |
Rita Marshall v. County of San Diego |
1. J.J. is placed in Marshall's Care |
Seth Baker v. Microsoft Corporation |
Plaintiffs, a putative class of owners of Microsoft |
LEFTWICH V. STATE |
¶1 Deborah Ann Leftwich was tried by bench trial and convicted of Count II, Soliciting and/or Accepting a Bribe from Another for Withdrawal of Candidacy in violation of 26 O.S.2001, § 16-108, in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. CF-2010-8067.1 The Honorable Cindy H. Truong sentenced Leftwich to one (1) year imprisonment, suspended, with the provision that she is prohibited from runni... More... $0 (07-18-2015 - ) |
LESLIE SUN v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, |
On May 28, 2011, Sun went to the emergency room in Marietta, Georgia, seeking treatment for a fractured ankle, which she reported was a result of a domestic altercation. On June 15, 2011, Sun underwent surgery—an “[o]pen reduction, internal fixation” of her left ankle fracture—and a metallic plate and screws were placed along the ankle fracture. Shortly after her surgery, Sun moved to Louisiana.... More... $0 (07-18-2015 - ) |
John Doe I v. City of Paul Bay, Florida |
John Doe I filed a nine-count amended complaint against the City of Palm Bay |
The Branson Label, Inc. v. City of Branson |
The Branson Label, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Florida Branson Label"), |
CITY OF CASPER, and V.H. MCDONALD, CPA v. KIMBERLY HOLLOWAY |
While Appellants present several issues for our review, because this matter is one for declaratory judgment arising from agency interpretation and application of certain statutes, our review calls for us to distill the issues into three controlling questions: |
Marquis COUEY v. Jeanne ATKINS |
We begin with a brief summary of the regulation of the initiative petition signature collection process to provide context for our discussion of the relevant facts. The powers of initiative and referendum reserved by the people in Article IV, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution allow them to enact statutes, adopt or reject bills passed by the legislature, and adopt amendments to the state consti... More... $0 (07-16-2015 - ) |
ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES v. CITY OF PHOENIX |
Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVS) owns, operates, and manages equipment for the transmission of sewage. As a “sanitary authority” organized under ORS chapter 450, RVS is a type of local government entity called a local service district. See ORS 174.116(2)(r) (“[A]s used in the statutes of this state[,] ‘local service district’ [includes a] sanitary authority * * * organized under ORS 450.600 to 45... More... $0 (07-16-2015 - ) |
Next Page |