M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Adoption Law
 
C.A. v. C.P.

This case involves a little girl bonded to and loved by each of her three parents.
The wife in a married couple (defendants C.P. and J.P., wife and husband)
conceived the child with a coworker (plaintiff C.A.), but hid that fact from wife’s
2
employer and--initially--from husband. The marriage remains intact and wife and
husband parent the child. For the first three years of th... More...
   $0 (11-14-2018 - CA)

STATE OF OHIO -vs- ERIC R. ATKINSON





Atkinson was indicted on Count One, Felonious Assault, in violation of R.C.
2903.11(A)(1), a felony of the second degree; Count Two, Domestic Violence (Prior
Offense), in violation of 2919.25(A), a felony of the fourth degree; Cou... More...
   $0 (11-09-2018 - OH)

STATE OF OHIO vs. ANTHONY D. CARTER





Appellant, Anthony Carter, was indicted on multiple felony
counts as part of a multi-count indictment naming eleven defendants. While
the indictment included seventy-seven counts, only counts one through six,
eleven throug... More...
   $0 (11-09-2018 - OH)

Citizens For Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona

In June 1993, appellant City of Pomona (Pomona) entered
into an agreement with non-party Regency Outdoor Advertising,
Inc. (Regency). Pursuant to that agreement, Regency erected
advertising billboards alongside several Pomona freeways.
Shortly thereafter, in November 1993, the citizens of Pomona
passed a ballot initiative, Proposition L (Prop. L), which
prohibited the const... More...
   $0 (11-09-2018 - CA)

Tynisa Williams v. City of Cleveland




MoreLaw Helps Lawyers Make Money




In 2009, Tynisa Williams brought suit against the City of
Cleveland (“the City”), on behalf o... More...
   $0 (11-06-2018 - OH)

Worldcall Interconnect, Inc., a/ka/ Evolve Broadband v. FCC

Worldcall Interconnect, Inc., petitions this court for review of the FCC’s order denying its application for review. Worldcall filed a complaint with the FCC after it and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C., were unsuccessful in negotiating
terms for a roaming agreement. In its complaint, Worldcall alleged that AT&T
had proposed terms that violated the FCC’s roaming rules and refused to
accept terms... More...
   $0 (11-05-2018 - TX)

Jason Wayne Charley v. The State of Texas





Angleton Police Department (“APD”) Officer Roxanne Raper, in uniform and in a marked police vehicle, responded to a 911 call reporting a disturbance at a home in Angleton, Texas. When she arrived, sh... More...
   $0 (11-04-2018 - TX)

United States of America v. Jesse Swayer






Jesse Sawyer, having pled guilty to sexual exploitation of children and
receipt of child pornography, was originally sentenced primarily to 30 years in
prison and a lifetime of supervised release. We ruled that that sentence was
shockingly high given Sawye... More...
   $0 (11-01-2018 - NY)

In the Interests of C.D., A.D., J.D., S.D., and B.D., Minor Children



Morelaw Internet Marketing
National Find A Lawyer Directory




Mother is the biological mother of C.D., B.D. A.D., J.D., and S.D. The family was referred to KVC... More...
   $0 (10-28-2018 - KS)

TOD A. PABST v. STATE OF KANSAS













In affirming the denial of Pabst's prior K.S.A. 60-1507 motion, the Kansas Supreme Court summarized the und... More...
   $0 (10-28-2018 - KS)

STATE OF KANSAS v. CHRISTOPHER GEORGE SOTO





On February 8, 2016, Salina Police Officers Matthew Halton and Steven Ediger randomly ran the license plate number of a vehicle while on patrol. Both Salina's local
2

files and the National Crime Information Center (N... More...   $0 (10-27-2018 - KS)

Domenico Taglieri v. Michelle Monasky




Domenico Taglieri and Michelle Monasky were married.

When the union fell apart, Monasky took A.M.T., their two-month-old daughter, from Italy to
the United States. Taglieri filed a petition under the Hague Convention to return A.M.T. to Italy.
The district court granted the... More...
   $0 (10-26-2018 - OH)

Jerry Watson v. Applebee's Franchisor, LLC

Danville, VA - Jerry Watson sued Applebee's Franchisor, LLC, AIG Virginia, LLC and Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. on personal injury negligence theories.

04/04/2018 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Halifax County Circuit Court, case number CL18000178-00. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400.00; pay.gov receipt number 0423-2869820), filed by Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: C... More...
   $0 (10-24-2018 - VA)

John Brotherston v. Putnam Investments, LLC

Plaintiffs John Brotherston and
Joan Glancy are two former employees of Putnam Investments, LLC
who participated in Putnam's defined-contribution 401(k)
retirement plan (the "Plan"). They brought this lawsuit on behalf
of a now-certified class of other participants in the Plan, and on
behalf of the Plan itself pursuant to the civil enforcement
provision of the Employee Reti... More...
   $0 (10-22-2018 - MA)

State of Tennessee v. Stephen Berline Orrick





On October 2, 2015, the Defendant was indicted on four counts of rape of a child and fo... More...
   $0 (10-15-2018 - TN)

NICOLE BRAND v. PHARMACARE MANAGEMENT, INC.



Morelaw Internet Marketing
National Find A Lawyer Directory




On June 11, 2012, Brand, a licensed pharmacist, obtained employment with Pharmacare. Pharmacare, which... More...
   $0 (10-14-2018 - KS)

In re A.S. Persons coming under the Juvenile Court Law, San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, v. C.S

This appeal arises from the juvenile court's selection of a tribal customary
adoption as the permanent plan for minors A.S. and E.S. and the corresponding award of
full faith and credit to the tribal customary adoption order. C.S. (Father) and T.F.
(Mother) appeal the court's orders, contending that their due process rights were violated
by the failure of the tribe to consider evid... More...
   $0 (10-14-2018 - CA)

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.




This appeal was brought to contest the approval of a class-action settlement. Dr. David Muransky filed a class action against Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. for violating the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). Appe... More...
   $0 (10-11-2018 - )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ASHLEY LYNN GRAY

MORELAW Legal Services Marketing


Your Source For Marketing Your Firm Nationwide . Completely Free Marketing If It Does Not Work.



Gray’s supervised release term commenced on July 26, 2016. In November 2017, Gray’... More...
   $0 (10-08-2018 - MT)

United States of America v. Adam Brake



Morelaw Internet Marketing
National Find A Lawyer Directory




We briefly summarize the essential facts of the case.
"Because this appeal follows a guilty... More...
   $0 (10-08-2018 - ME)

STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARIELLE LYDE






The mother and daughter reside together. The mother owns a Kia Sorento, and the daughter owns a Kia Soul. State Farm issued an insurance policy for the mother's vehicle that lists the mother as the only named insured on the declarations page an... More...
   $0 (10-07-2018 - FL)

Peter Humphrey v. Glaxosmithkline, PLC




Section 1964(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–
1968, creates a private right of action for a plaintiff that “is
injured in his [or her] business or property” as a result ... More...
   $0 (10-03-2018 - PA)

Kristen Giovanni v. United States Department of the Navy





The Giovanni family and the Palmer family live in neighborhoods close to contaminated federal facilities that were owned and operated for decades by the United States Navy. The families filed separate suits in state court under the P... More...
   $0 (10-03-2018 - PA)

Richard L. Fowler v. Caliber Homes Loans, Inc.





When an individual takes out a mortgage, he or she secures the loan with real property. To protect its security interest, lenders usually require borrowers to maintain hazard insurance in an amount that is at least equal to the loan’s unpaid principal balance. Should a ... More...
   $0 (10-02-2018 - FL)

In The Matter of J.L.O.

¶1 The questions presented to this Court are whether 1) the district court abused its discretion by denying Mother's motion to continue and allowing her waiver of jury trial; 2) a witness testifying telephonically violated Mother's right to procedural due process; 3) the State presented clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of parental rights; and 4) Mother's trial counsel provi... More...   $0 (09-25-2018 - OK)

Next Page

 
 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2018 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.