ADEA Law
 
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.

The underlying dispute in this case concerns where housing for low-income persons should be constructed in Dallas, Texas—that is, whether the housing should be built in the inner city or in the suburbs. This dispute comes to the Court on a disparate-impact theory of liability. In contrast to a disparate-treatment case, where a “plaintiff must establish that the defendant had a discriminatory i... More...   $0 (06-25-2015 - TX)

Sabreen Gad v. Kansas State University

Sabreen Gad filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission against Kansas State University, alleging that she was discriminated
against in her effort to obtain a promotion to a tenure-track faculty position.
Although the EEOC sent her a formal charge document to sign and verify, as both
Title VII and EEOC regulations require, she never did so. Nevertheless, afte... More...
   $0 (05-27-2015 - KS)

Dallas National Insurance Company v. Calitex Corp., Elshir Enterprises, L.P. and Thomas, L.P.

This is an insurance coverage case. Appellees Calitex Corporation; Elshir Enterprises, L.P.; and Thomas, L.P. (collectively, “Calitex”) filed this lawsuit against appellant Dallas National Insurance Company (“DNIC”) seeking, in part, a declaration that DNIC owes a duty to indemnify Calitex respecting a judgment Calitex obtained (the “underlying judgment”) in a separate underlying lawsu... More...   $0 (03-03-2015 - TX)

William Douglas Fulghum, et al. v. Embarq Corporation

Plaintiffs-appellants represent a class of retirees (collectively “Plaintiffs”)
formerly employed by Sprint-Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”), Embarq Corporation
(“Embarq”), or a predecessor and/or subsidiary company of either Embarq or
- 3 -
Sprint (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiffs brought this suit after Defendants
altered or eliminated health and life insur... More...
   $0 (02-25-2015 - )

Michael Anderson v. Ben Perrine

Plaintiff, Michael Anderson, hereby files this Petition against Defendant Ben Perrine and for his Petition, states and alleges as follows:
PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Plaintiff is an individual and citizen of the State of Oklahoma residing in Rogers County.
2. Defendant Ben Perrine is an individual and citizen of the State of Oklahoma residing in Tulsa County. Ben Perrine is a l... More...
   $1 (01-22-2015 - OK)

Deborah Malin v. Hospira, Inc.

Plaintiff Deborah Malin appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer on her retaliation claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and in favor of the employer and several managers on her retalia-tion claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. We reverse and remand for trial.
2 No. 13... More...
   $0 (08-07-2014 - IL)

Maria Rebolledo v. Tilly's Inc.

Tilly’s Inc. and World of Jeans & Tops, Inc. (hereafter collectively referred to in the singular as Employer) appeal from the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration of Maria Rebolledo’s putative class action regarding statutory wage claims. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion the parties’ arbitration agreement expressly excluded statutory wage claims from the... More...   $0 (08-06-2014 - CA)

Michael Dunn v. Trustees of Boston College

Michael Dunn appeals the entry
of summary judgment against him on his claim that his former
employer, Boston University ("BU"), discharged him because of his
age in violation of the Massachusetts Fair Employment Practices
Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, § 4.1B. The district court ruled
that Dunn had failed to make out a prima facie case of age
discrimination. Without ruling... More...
   $0 (07-30-2014 - MA)

Sebastian Lombardo v. Shouvik Bhattacharyya

In this interlocutory appeal, Sebastian Lombardo appeals the trial court’s order denying his special appearance, concluding the trial court had specific jurisdiction over Lombardo, in an action brought by Shouvik Bhattacharyya, alleging Lombardo is liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, and negligent misrepresentation. In five issues, L... More...   $0 (07-30-2014 - TX)

Anthony Hildebrand v. Allegheny County

This appeal presents three issues on which we have not previously ruled in a precedential opinion. First, whether an employee terminated from a local government position may maintain an action for age discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Second, whether the pleading of exhaustion of administrative remedies, a prerequisite to bringing a lawsuit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“... More...   $0 (06-27-2014 - PA)

Arshavir Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC

In this case, we again address whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts a state law rule that restricts enforcement of terms in arbitration agreements. Here, an employee seeks to bring a class action lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated employees for his employer‘s alleged failure to compensate its employees for, among other things, overtime and meal and rest periods. Th... More...   $0 (06-23-2014 - CA)

Wanda Rogers v. Bromac Title Services, L.L.C., et

Wanda Rogers appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Bromac Title Services, and its owner, Title Resource Group, LLC (collectively, “Bromac” or “appellees”), dismissing her claims under the Jury System Improvement Act (“JSIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1875. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

From April 29, 20... More...
   $0 (06-18-2014 - OK)

Ruth Rosenfeld v. Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School, Inc.

In this age discrimination case, plaintiff and appellant Ruth Rosenfeld (Rosenfeld) appeals a judgment following a defense verdict in favor of her former employer, defendant and respondent Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School, Inc. (Heschel). Rosenfeld alleged Heschel repeatedly reduced her teaching hours “in an effort to force her out of her position because of her age.” Heschel attributed the r... More...   $0 (05-28-2014 - CA)

James Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.

Appellants James Kumar, Ranveer Singh,
Asegedew Gefe, and Abbas Kosymov brought a class action lawsuit against their
employer, Gate Gourmet Inc., alleging two common law torts and two violations of
Washington's Law Against Discrimination (the WLAD), chapter 49.60 RCW. The
lawsuit stems from Gate Gourmet's employee meal policy, which bars employees
from bringing in their own foo... More...
   $0 (05-22-2014 - WA)

Armand Santoro v. Accenture Federal Services, LLC

Dr. Armand Santoro appeals the district court’s order granting the motion by Accenture Federal Services, LLC (Accenture) to compel arbitration. Because we agree with the district court that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) does not invalidate the arbitration agreement between Accenture and Santoro, we affirm.

I.

Santoro began hi... More...
   $0 (05-05-2014 - VA)

Georgie Brewer v. New Era, Inc.

Plaintiffs Georgie Brewer, 77 years old, and Barbara Greene, 70 years old, are sisters of African-American descent, who are appealing the district court’s order granting Defendant, New Era, Inc., summary judgment on one claim of age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and one claim of race discrimination under Title VII of ... More...   $0 (04-29-2014 - TN)

City of Austin v. Raymond E. Chandler, et al.

The Appellees—a group of public safety officers over the age of 40 who worked for appellant the City of Austin’s now defunct Public Safety Emergency Management Department (PSEM)—sued the City for age-based employment discrimination. The Appellees asserted that the

1 For convenience, we refer to the Appellees collectively. City’s method of consolidating the PSEM into the Austin Polic... More...
   $0 (04-17-2014 - TX)

Tracy Bartlett v. Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service)

Tracy Bartlett filed a one-count complaint against her former employer, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), in which she alleged that she had been constructively discharged in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The IRS moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that Ms. Bartlett had... More...   $0 (04-08-2014 - MA)

Tim Lors v. Jim Dean

Tim Lors sued his employer, the South Dakota Bureau of Information and Technology (BIT), and various state employees (collectively, "defendants"), alleging retaliation in response to a prior discrimination suit that he filed against the same defendants. Lors's complaint asserted jurisdiction under various federal statutes, including Titles I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (AD... More...   $0 (03-13-2014 - SD)

Robert Deleon v. Kalamazoo County Road Commission

Robert Deleon (“Deleon”) appeals the dismissal of certain of his claims from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Defendants’ favor. The district court granted Defendants’ motion on the basis that Deleon did not suffer an “adverse employment action.” Deleon was laterally transferred from one department to another, which he alleges constituted an action giving rise to sus... More...   $0 (01-14-2014 - MI)

Harriet Walczak v. Chicago Board of Education

Harriet Walczak was in her fourth decade of teaching in the Chicago Public School system when her school’s new principal placed her in a performanceremediation program during the 2007–2008 academic year. By the end of that school year, she was facing discharge proceedings. Walczak thought that the principal had it in for

2 No. 12-2808

her based on her age (she was in her late... More...
   $0 (01-10-2014 - IL)

Paul Chamblee v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation

Paul Chamblee appeals the district court’s grant of Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation (“Farm Bureau”), Randy Knight and David Waide’s (collectively, the “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment concerning Chamblee’s Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) claim and various state-law claims. Because Chamblee did not demonstrate that the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.... More...
   $0 (01-06-2014 - MS)

Benjamin Joffe v. Google, Inc.

In the course of capturing its Street View photographs, Google collected data from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks. Google publicly apologized, but plaintiffs brought suit under federal and state law, including the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Google argues that its data collection did not violate

JOFFE V. GOOGLE, INC. 5

the Act because data transmitted over a Wi-Fi network is an “el... More...
   $0 (12-27-2013 - CA)

Carman Llerena Diaz v. Jiten Hotel Management, Inc.

Before us now for the third time, this case focuses our attention on whether the mandate we issued last time the case was before us foreclosed an otherwise unchallenged use of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) to modify the judgment on remand. We are also asked to determine whether an award of $104,626.34 in attorney's fees and costs, for a suit obtaining a damages award of $7,650, is so dispr... More...   $0 (12-18-2013 - OK)

James Reynolds v. Daniel M. Tangherlini

James Reynolds was 62 years old when his employer, the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”), passed him over for a promotion in favor of a 32-year-old employee. Reynolds sued the GSA Administrator alleging that the agency discriminated against him on the basis of age in violation of the “federal sector” provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. ... More...   $0 (12-12-2013 - IL)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: